MRI-Based Structural Failure Comparison between Chinese and American White Women With Prolapse: A Case-Control Study.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Bing Xie, Lahari Nandikanti, Carolyn W Swenson, Jing Wu, Tianhang Liu, Xin Yang, Yi Li, Xiuli Sun, John O DeLancey, Luyun Chen, Jianliu Wang
{"title":"MRI-Based Structural Failure Comparison between Chinese and American White Women With Prolapse: A Case-Control Study.","authors":"Bing Xie, Lahari Nandikanti, Carolyn W Swenson, Jing Wu, Tianhang Liu, Xin Yang, Yi Li, Xiuli Sun, John O DeLancey, Luyun Chen, Jianliu Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00192-024-05945-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Although some evidence suggests that Chinese and white women might have different pelvic floor anatomy such as levator complex and connective tissue support for pelvic organs, it is unknown if these differences affect the mechanisms of pelvic organ prolapse. We sought to determine whether differences exist in MRI-based structural failure patterns between Chinese and American white women with prolapse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a case-control study in different racial cohorts recruited in China and the USA. The Chinese cohort included 19 women with anterior-predominant prolapse and 24 controls with normal pelvic support. The American white cohort included 30 women with anterior-predominant prolapse and 30 controls. Both cohorts underwent the same clinical evaluation and MRI protocol. Three structural support systems were quantified on stress 3D MRI at maximal Valsalva: vaginal factors (length, width); connective tissue attachment (cervix, lateral paravaginal height); and hiatus factors (urogenital hiatus size, major levator ani injury). Abnormal structural support was defined as any measurement outside the normal range defined as the 5th to 95th percentile in controls from the respective cohort. The percentages of the women with abnormal support in the two cohorts were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among those with prolapse, Chinese women were more likely than white women to have abnormally long vaginal length and width (90% vs 40%, p < 0.001; 53% vs 23%, p = 0.031 respectively). The occurrence of abnormal apical location, paravaginal location, and genital hiatus size ranged from 89 to 100% in Chinese women and from 63 to 80% in white women.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prolapse in American white women most commonly involves structural failure of connective tissue attachments and hiatus factors and less frequently involves vaginal wall factors, whereas prolapse in Chinese women frequently involves all support structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05945-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Although some evidence suggests that Chinese and white women might have different pelvic floor anatomy such as levator complex and connective tissue support for pelvic organs, it is unknown if these differences affect the mechanisms of pelvic organ prolapse. We sought to determine whether differences exist in MRI-based structural failure patterns between Chinese and American white women with prolapse.

Methods: This is a case-control study in different racial cohorts recruited in China and the USA. The Chinese cohort included 19 women with anterior-predominant prolapse and 24 controls with normal pelvic support. The American white cohort included 30 women with anterior-predominant prolapse and 30 controls. Both cohorts underwent the same clinical evaluation and MRI protocol. Three structural support systems were quantified on stress 3D MRI at maximal Valsalva: vaginal factors (length, width); connective tissue attachment (cervix, lateral paravaginal height); and hiatus factors (urogenital hiatus size, major levator ani injury). Abnormal structural support was defined as any measurement outside the normal range defined as the 5th to 95th percentile in controls from the respective cohort. The percentages of the women with abnormal support in the two cohorts were compared.

Results: Among those with prolapse, Chinese women were more likely than white women to have abnormally long vaginal length and width (90% vs 40%, p < 0.001; 53% vs 23%, p = 0.031 respectively). The occurrence of abnormal apical location, paravaginal location, and genital hiatus size ranged from 89 to 100% in Chinese women and from 63 to 80% in white women.

Conclusions: Prolapse in American white women most commonly involves structural failure of connective tissue attachments and hiatus factors and less frequently involves vaginal wall factors, whereas prolapse in Chinese women frequently involves all support structures.

基于核磁共振成像的中国和美国白人女性脱垂患者结构失效比较:病例对照研究
引言和假设:尽管有证据表明,中国女性和白人女性的盆底解剖结构(如提肌复合体和盆腔器官的结缔组织支持)可能不同,但这些差异是否会影响盆腔器官脱垂的机制尚不清楚。我们试图确定患有脱垂的中国女性和美国白人女性在基于核磁共振成像的结构失效模式上是否存在差异:这是一项在中国和美国招募的不同种族队列中进行的病例对照研究。中国队列包括 19 名患有前脱垂的妇女和 24 名骨盆支撑正常的对照组。美国白人队列包括 30 名患有前脱垂的妇女和 30 名对照组妇女。两个队列接受了相同的临床评估和磁共振成像方案。在最大 Valsalva 运动时,应力三维核磁共振成像对三种结构支撑系统进行了量化:阴道因素(长度、宽度);结缔组织附着(宫颈、侧阴道旁高度);裂孔因素(尿道裂孔大小、主要提肛肌损伤)。结构支撑力异常是指任何测量值超出了正常范围,正常范围定义为各自队列中对照组的第 5 至第 95 百分位数。比较了两个队列中支撑力异常妇女的百分比:结果:在患有阴道脱垂的妇女中,华裔妇女比白人妇女更容易出现阴道长度和宽度异常的情况(90% 对 40%,P<0.05):美国白人妇女的脱垂最常见的是结缔组织附件和裂孔因素导致的结构性故障,较少涉及阴道壁因素,而中国妇女的脱垂则经常涉及所有支撑结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信