Impact of anti-VEGF treatment-free interval during the first year on 5-year outcomes in eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Katherine Du, Natasha Mayer, Catalina Feistritzer, Elise Barberis, Ilkay Kilic Muftuoglu, Jay Chhablani
{"title":"Impact of anti-VEGF treatment-free interval during the first year on 5-year outcomes in eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion.","authors":"Katherine Du, Natasha Mayer, Catalina Feistritzer, Elise Barberis, Ilkay Kilic Muftuoglu, Jay Chhablani","doi":"10.1177/11206721241299855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to analyze the impact of longest treatment-free interval (TFI) between anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections during the first year of treatment on 5-year best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and recurrence of macular edema (ME) in eyes with ME secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study including eyes with BRVO, minimum of 5-year follow-up, and available optical coherence topography (OCT) scans. Eyes underwent anti-VEGF loading dose therapy and were treated and monitored with an OCT-guided PRN regimen. Those with a history of ocular comorbidities were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total of 60 patient eyes, with 40 females and average age of 71.75 ± 11.07 years. TFI among eyes was 1 month (20%); > 1-2 months (23%); > 2-3 months (18%); > 3-4 months (17%), and >4 months (22%). Forty-three (72%) eyes experienced ME recurrence during the five-year period. Multivariate linear regression shows that TFI (-0.02 [-0.03-0.00], <i>p</i> = 0.021) and baseline BCVA (0.37 [0.08-0.66], <i>p</i> = 0.014) are significant predictors of 5-year BCVA. TFI (Cox Proportional Hazard Ratio 1.34 [1.04-1.72], <i>p</i> = 0.023) and number of injections in the first year (Cox Proportional Hazard Ratio 1.76 [1.01-3.06], <i>p</i> = 0.045) were significant predictors of ME recurrence. Gender, age, type of injection, BCVA, and CMT did not influence recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For eyes receiving anti-VEGF injections to treat ME secondary to BRVO, TFI is a significant predictor of 5-year BCVA and ME recurrence according to regression models. This study suggests more ME recurrence may be due to increased TFI or indicate more injections needed to treat severe BRVO.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"11206721241299855"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721241299855","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to analyze the impact of longest treatment-free interval (TFI) between anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections during the first year of treatment on 5-year best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and recurrence of macular edema (ME) in eyes with ME secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

Methods: A retrospective study including eyes with BRVO, minimum of 5-year follow-up, and available optical coherence topography (OCT) scans. Eyes underwent anti-VEGF loading dose therapy and were treated and monitored with an OCT-guided PRN regimen. Those with a history of ocular comorbidities were excluded.

Results: Total of 60 patient eyes, with 40 females and average age of 71.75 ± 11.07 years. TFI among eyes was 1 month (20%); > 1-2 months (23%); > 2-3 months (18%); > 3-4 months (17%), and >4 months (22%). Forty-three (72%) eyes experienced ME recurrence during the five-year period. Multivariate linear regression shows that TFI (-0.02 [-0.03-0.00], p = 0.021) and baseline BCVA (0.37 [0.08-0.66], p = 0.014) are significant predictors of 5-year BCVA. TFI (Cox Proportional Hazard Ratio 1.34 [1.04-1.72], p = 0.023) and number of injections in the first year (Cox Proportional Hazard Ratio 1.76 [1.01-3.06], p = 0.045) were significant predictors of ME recurrence. Gender, age, type of injection, BCVA, and CMT did not influence recurrence.

Conclusion: For eyes receiving anti-VEGF injections to treat ME secondary to BRVO, TFI is a significant predictor of 5-year BCVA and ME recurrence according to regression models. This study suggests more ME recurrence may be due to increased TFI or indicate more injections needed to treat severe BRVO.

视网膜分支静脉闭塞患者第一年无抗血管内皮生长因子治疗间隔对五年预后的影响。
研究目的本研究旨在分析视网膜分支静脉闭塞(BRVO)继发性黄斑水肿(ME)患者在治疗第一年注射抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)的最长无治疗间隔期(TFI)对5年最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和黄斑水肿(ME)复发的影响:方法:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象包括视网膜分支静脉阻塞(BRVO)患者,随访至少 5 年,并提供光学相干地形图(OCT)扫描结果。患者接受抗血管内皮生长因子负荷剂量治疗,并在 OCT 引导下接受 PRN 方案治疗和监测。有眼部合并症病史的患者被排除在外:共有 60 名患者,其中女性 40 名,平均年龄(71.75 ± 11.07)岁。TFI为1个月(20%);>1-2个月(23%);>2-3个月(18%);>3-4个月(17%)和>4个月(22%)。在这五年期间,有43只眼睛(72%)的ME复发。多变量线性回归显示,TFI(-0.02 [-0.03-0.00],p = 0.021)和基线 BCVA(0.37 [0.08-0.66],p = 0.014)是 5 年 BCVA 的重要预测因素。TFI(考克斯比例危险比 1.34 [1.04-1.72],p = 0.023)和第一年的注射次数(考克斯比例危险比 1.76 [1.01-3.06],p = 0.045)是 ME 复发的重要预测因素。性别、年龄、注射类型、BCVA和CMT对复发没有影响:结论:对于接受抗血管内皮生长因子注射治疗继发于BRVO的ME的眼睛,根据回归模型,TFI是5年BCVA和ME复发的重要预测因素。这项研究表明,TFI升高可能导致更多的ME复发,也可能表明治疗严重BRVO需要更多的注射。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
372
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信