Transferable performance of machine learning potentials across graphene-water systems of different sizes: Insights from numerical metrics and physical characteristics.

IF 3.1 2区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Dongfei Liu, Jianzhong Wu, Diannan Lu
{"title":"Transferable performance of machine learning potentials across graphene-water systems of different sizes: Insights from numerical metrics and physical characteristics.","authors":"Dongfei Liu, Jianzhong Wu, Diannan Lu","doi":"10.1063/5.0233395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Machine learning potentials (MLPs) are promising for various chemical systems, but their complexity and lack of physical interpretability challenge their broad applicability. This study evaluates the transferability of the deep potential (DP) and neural equivariant interatomic potential (NequIP) models for graphene-water systems using numerical metrics and physical characteristics. We found that the data quality from density functional theory calculations significantly influences MLP predictive accuracy. Prediction errors in transferring systems reveal the particularities of quantum chemical calculations on the heterogeneous graphene-water systems. Even for supercells with non-planar graphene carbon atoms, k-point mesh is necessary to obtain accurate results. In contrast, gamma-point calculations are sufficiently accurate for water molecules. In addition, we performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations using these two models and compared the physical features such as atomic density profiles, radial distribution functions, and self-diffusion coefficients. It was found that although the NequIP model has higher accuracy than the DP model, the differences in the above physical features between them were not significant. Considering the stochasticity and complexity inherent in simulations, as well as the statistical averaging of physical characteristics, this motivates us to explore the meaning of accurately predicting atomic force in aligning the physical characteristics evolved by MD simulations with the actual physical features.</p>","PeriodicalId":15313,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Physics","volume":"161 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0233395","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Machine learning potentials (MLPs) are promising for various chemical systems, but their complexity and lack of physical interpretability challenge their broad applicability. This study evaluates the transferability of the deep potential (DP) and neural equivariant interatomic potential (NequIP) models for graphene-water systems using numerical metrics and physical characteristics. We found that the data quality from density functional theory calculations significantly influences MLP predictive accuracy. Prediction errors in transferring systems reveal the particularities of quantum chemical calculations on the heterogeneous graphene-water systems. Even for supercells with non-planar graphene carbon atoms, k-point mesh is necessary to obtain accurate results. In contrast, gamma-point calculations are sufficiently accurate for water molecules. In addition, we performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations using these two models and compared the physical features such as atomic density profiles, radial distribution functions, and self-diffusion coefficients. It was found that although the NequIP model has higher accuracy than the DP model, the differences in the above physical features between them were not significant. Considering the stochasticity and complexity inherent in simulations, as well as the statistical averaging of physical characteristics, this motivates us to explore the meaning of accurately predicting atomic force in aligning the physical characteristics evolved by MD simulations with the actual physical features.

机器学习潜力在不同尺寸的石墨烯-水系统中的可迁移性能:从数值指标和物理特性中窥见一斑。
机器学习电位(MLP)在各种化学系统中大有可为,但其复杂性和缺乏物理可解释性对其广泛适用性提出了挑战。本研究利用数值指标和物理特性,评估了石墨烯-水系统的深度电位(DP)和神经等变原子间电位(NequIP)模型的可移植性。我们发现,密度泛函理论计算的数据质量会显著影响 MLP 的预测精度。传输系统中的预测误差揭示了异质石墨烯-水系统量子化学计算的特殊性。即使是具有非平面石墨烯碳原子的超级电池,也必须使用 k 点网格才能获得准确的结果。相比之下,伽马点计算对水分子来说足够精确。此外,我们还利用这两种模型进行了分子动力学(MD)模拟,并比较了原子密度曲线、径向分布函数和自扩散系数等物理特征。结果发现,虽然 NequIP 模型的精度高于 DP 模型,但两者在上述物理特征方面的差异并不显著。考虑到模拟本身的随机性和复杂性,以及物理特征的统计平均性,这促使我们探索准确预测原子力在使 MD 模拟演化的物理特征与实际物理特征相一致方面的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Physics
Journal of Chemical Physics 物理-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
15.90%
发文量
1615
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Physics publishes quantitative and rigorous science of long-lasting value in methods and applications of chemical physics. The Journal also publishes brief Communications of significant new findings, Perspectives on the latest advances in the field, and Special Topic issues. The Journal focuses on innovative research in experimental and theoretical areas of chemical physics, including spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, and quantum mechanics. In addition, topical areas such as polymers, soft matter, materials, surfaces/interfaces, and systems of biological relevance are of increasing importance. Topical coverage includes: Theoretical Methods and Algorithms Advanced Experimental Techniques Atoms, Molecules, and Clusters Liquids, Glasses, and Crystals Surfaces, Interfaces, and Materials Polymers and Soft Matter Biological Molecules and Networks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信