Brain injury in premature infants may be related to abnormal colonization of early gut microbiome.

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Li Hou, Jing Zhao, Linlin Yin, Lu Dai, Hong Deng, Lin Jiang
{"title":"Brain injury in premature infants may be related to abnormal colonization of early gut microbiome.","authors":"Li Hou, Jing Zhao, Linlin Yin, Lu Dai, Hong Deng, Lin Jiang","doi":"10.1186/s12866-024-03643-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Premature infants are more prone to brain injuries owing to incomplete nervous system development and poor adaptation outside the mother's body. Without timely intervention, premature infants with brain injuries often develop intellectual disabilities, causing significant burdens on families and the society. Multiple studies have shown that gut dysbiosis can affect the nervous system, and vice versa. This study aimed to explore the changes in gut microbiota of typical premature infants and those with brain injuries on the third and seventh days after birth using 16 S rRNA technology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fecal samples from typical premature infants (non-brain injury group, n = 17) and those with brain injuries (brain injury group, n = 21) were collected on days 1, 3, and 7 after birth for 16 S rRNA sequencing. Alpha diversity analysis was used to evaluate the diversity of gut microbiome. LEfSe and DESeq2 were used to analyze of the microorganisms' characteristics and differentiate the microorganisms between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the phylum level, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria were the dominant flora in both groups. At the genus level, the proportion of Enterococcus in fecal samples of the brain injury group was higher than that of the non-brain injury group on day three after birth; however, the opposite was observed on day seven. Rothia and Lactobacillales were characteristic bacteria of the non-brain injury group on days three and seven after birth, whereas Enterococcus and Bifidobacteria were characteristic bacteria of the brain injury group on days three and seven after birth, respectively. Three days after birth, the Shannon and Simpson indices of the non-brain injury group were significantly higher than those of the brain injury group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Premature infants with brain injuries have a unique gut microbiota that is different from that of typical premature infants, indicating correlation between brain injuries and gut microbiota.</p>","PeriodicalId":9233,"journal":{"name":"BMC Microbiology","volume":"24 1","pages":"483"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575211/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-024-03643-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Premature infants are more prone to brain injuries owing to incomplete nervous system development and poor adaptation outside the mother's body. Without timely intervention, premature infants with brain injuries often develop intellectual disabilities, causing significant burdens on families and the society. Multiple studies have shown that gut dysbiosis can affect the nervous system, and vice versa. This study aimed to explore the changes in gut microbiota of typical premature infants and those with brain injuries on the third and seventh days after birth using 16 S rRNA technology.

Methods: Fecal samples from typical premature infants (non-brain injury group, n = 17) and those with brain injuries (brain injury group, n = 21) were collected on days 1, 3, and 7 after birth for 16 S rRNA sequencing. Alpha diversity analysis was used to evaluate the diversity of gut microbiome. LEfSe and DESeq2 were used to analyze of the microorganisms' characteristics and differentiate the microorganisms between the two groups.

Results: At the phylum level, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria were the dominant flora in both groups. At the genus level, the proportion of Enterococcus in fecal samples of the brain injury group was higher than that of the non-brain injury group on day three after birth; however, the opposite was observed on day seven. Rothia and Lactobacillales were characteristic bacteria of the non-brain injury group on days three and seven after birth, whereas Enterococcus and Bifidobacteria were characteristic bacteria of the brain injury group on days three and seven after birth, respectively. Three days after birth, the Shannon and Simpson indices of the non-brain injury group were significantly higher than those of the brain injury group.

Conclusion: Premature infants with brain injuries have a unique gut microbiota that is different from that of typical premature infants, indicating correlation between brain injuries and gut microbiota.

早产儿脑损伤可能与早期肠道微生物组定植异常有关。
背景:早产儿由于神经系统发育不完全,对母体外的适应能力较差,容易发生脑损伤。如果不及时干预,脑损伤早产儿往往会发展成智障,给家庭和社会带来沉重负担。多项研究表明,肠道菌群失调会影响神经系统,反之亦然。本研究旨在利用 16 S rRNA 技术探讨典型早产儿和脑损伤患儿出生后第三天和第七天肠道微生物群的变化:方法:收集典型早产儿(非脑损伤组,n = 17)和脑损伤早产儿(脑损伤组,n = 21)出生后第 1、3 和 7 天的粪便样本,进行 16 S rRNA 测序。阿尔法多样性分析用于评估肠道微生物组的多样性。使用 LEfSe 和 DESeq2 分析微生物的特征,并区分两组之间的微生物:结果:在门的水平上,固缩菌、蛋白菌和放线菌是两组的优势菌群。在属一级,脑损伤组在出生后第三天粪便样本中的肠球菌比例高于非脑损伤组,但在第七天则相反。罗氏菌和乳酸杆菌是非脑损伤组在出生后第三天和第七天的特征细菌,而肠球菌和双歧杆菌则分别是脑损伤组在出生后第三天和第七天的特征细菌。出生后三天,非脑损伤组的香农指数和辛普森指数明显高于脑损伤组:结论:脑损伤早产儿的肠道微生物群与一般早产儿不同,表明脑损伤与肠道微生物群之间存在相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Microbiology
BMC Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Microbiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on analytical and functional studies of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and small parasites, as well as host and therapeutic responses to them and their interaction with the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信