Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for focal liver lesions can be safely performed in patients with ascites.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2024-11-18 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2427-2427
Yuichi Takano, Naoki Tamai, Masataka Yamawaki, Jun Noda, Tetsushi Azami, Fumitaka Niiya, Fumiya Nishimoto, Naotaka Maruoka, Tatsuya Yamagami, Masatsugu Nagahama
{"title":"Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for focal liver lesions can be safely performed in patients with ascites.","authors":"Yuichi Takano, Naoki Tamai, Masataka Yamawaki, Jun Noda, Tetsushi Azami, Fumitaka Niiya, Fumiya Nishimoto, Naotaka Maruoka, Tatsuya Yamagami, Masatsugu Nagahama","doi":"10.1055/a-2427-2427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> In patients with ascites, percutaneous liver biopsy is generally contraindicated. Because endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) allows tissue sample obtention from the digestive tract lumen, a biopsy without the intervention of ascites may prevent adverse events (AEs). This study aimed to evaluate the safety of EUS-TA for focal liver lesions in the presence of ascites. <b>Patients and methods</b> A retrospective study was conducted using medical records of cases in which EUS-TA was performed on focal liver lesions between 2016 and 2022. Study participants were classified into two groups: those with ascites and those without it, and the outcomes were compared. The primary outcome was AEs. <b>Results</b> We included 109 cases of EUS-TA for focal liver lesions. Ascites was present in 20.1% of cases (22/109) and absent in 79.8% of cases (87/109). There were no significant differences between the two groups in clinical backgrounds and EUS-TA procedure, although fine-needle biopsy needles were significantly more frequently used in patients without ascites. In the ascites group, puncture without intervening ascites was successful in 90.9% of cases (20/22). The incidence of AEs was 4.5% (1/22) in the ascites group and 1.1% (1/87) in the non-ascites group, showing no significant difference. The two AEs were mild self-limiting abdominal pain. <b>Conclusions</b> In focal liver lesions with ascites, EUS-TA allows biopsy without the intervention of ascites in most cases. The incidence of AEs did not differ significantly between patients with and without ascites.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 11","pages":"E1309-E1314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2427-2427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims In patients with ascites, percutaneous liver biopsy is generally contraindicated. Because endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) allows tissue sample obtention from the digestive tract lumen, a biopsy without the intervention of ascites may prevent adverse events (AEs). This study aimed to evaluate the safety of EUS-TA for focal liver lesions in the presence of ascites. Patients and methods A retrospective study was conducted using medical records of cases in which EUS-TA was performed on focal liver lesions between 2016 and 2022. Study participants were classified into two groups: those with ascites and those without it, and the outcomes were compared. The primary outcome was AEs. Results We included 109 cases of EUS-TA for focal liver lesions. Ascites was present in 20.1% of cases (22/109) and absent in 79.8% of cases (87/109). There were no significant differences between the two groups in clinical backgrounds and EUS-TA procedure, although fine-needle biopsy needles were significantly more frequently used in patients without ascites. In the ascites group, puncture without intervening ascites was successful in 90.9% of cases (20/22). The incidence of AEs was 4.5% (1/22) in the ascites group and 1.1% (1/87) in the non-ascites group, showing no significant difference. The two AEs were mild self-limiting abdominal pain. Conclusions In focal liver lesions with ascites, EUS-TA allows biopsy without the intervention of ascites in most cases. The incidence of AEs did not differ significantly between patients with and without ascites.

腹水患者可以在内窥镜超声引导下安全地进行肝脏病灶组织采集。
背景和研究目的 在腹水患者中,经皮肝活检通常是禁忌症。由于内镜超声引导下组织采集(EUS-TA)可以从消化道腔内获取组织样本,因此在没有腹水干预的情况下进行活检可以避免不良事件(AEs)的发生。本研究旨在评估在有腹水的情况下使用 EUS-TA 检查肝脏病灶的安全性。患者和方法 采用2016年至2022年间对肝脏局灶性病变进行EUS-TA的病例的医疗记录进行了一项回顾性研究。研究参与者分为两组:有腹水和无腹水,并对结果进行比较。主要结果为 AEs。结果 我们纳入了109例EUS-TA治疗肝脏病灶的病例。20.1%的病例(22/109)有腹水,79.8%的病例(87/109)无腹水。两组患者的临床背景和 EUS-TA 过程无明显差异,但无腹水患者使用细针活检针的频率明显更高。在腹水组中,90.9% 的病例(20/22)在无腹水介入的情况下穿刺成功。腹水组的 AE 发生率为 4.5%(1/22),无腹水组为 1.1%(1/87),无明显差异。两例 AE 为轻度自限性腹痛。结论 对于伴有腹水的局灶性肝脏病变,EUS-TA 可在大多数情况下进行活检,而无需对腹水进行干预。有腹水和无腹水患者的 AE 发生率无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信