Kareem Khalaf, Katarzyna M Pawlak, Douglas G Adler, Asma A Alkandari, Alan N Barkun, Todd H Baron, Robert Bechara, Tyler M Berzin, Cecilia Binda, Ming-Yan Cai, Silvia Carrara, Yen-I Chen, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura, Nauzer Forbes, Alessandro Fugazza, Cesare Hassan, Paul D James, Michel Kahaleh, Harry Martin, Roberta Maselli, Gary R May, Jeffrey D Mosko, Ganiyat Kikelomo Oyeleke, Bret T Petersen, Alessandro Repici, Payal Saxena, Amrita Sethi, Reem Z Sharaiha, Marco Spadaccini, Raymond Shing-Yan Tang, Christopher W Teshima, Mariano Villarroel, Jeanin E van Hooft, Rogier P Voermans, Daniel von Renteln, Catharine M Walsh, Tricia Aberin, Dawn Banavage, Jowell A Chen, James Clancy, Heather Drake, Melanie Im, Chooi Peng Low, Alexandra Myszko, Krista Navarro, Jessica Redman, Wayne Reyes, Faina Weinstein, Sunil Gupta, Ahmed H Mokhtar, Caleb Na, Daniel Tham, Yusuke Fujiyoshi, Tony He, Sharan B Malipatil, Reza Gholami, Nikko Gimpaya, Arjun Kundra, Samir C Grover, Natalia S Causada Calo
{"title":"Defining standards for fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy using Delphi methodology.","authors":"Kareem Khalaf, Katarzyna M Pawlak, Douglas G Adler, Asma A Alkandari, Alan N Barkun, Todd H Baron, Robert Bechara, Tyler M Berzin, Cecilia Binda, Ming-Yan Cai, Silvia Carrara, Yen-I Chen, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura, Nauzer Forbes, Alessandro Fugazza, Cesare Hassan, Paul D James, Michel Kahaleh, Harry Martin, Roberta Maselli, Gary R May, Jeffrey D Mosko, Ganiyat Kikelomo Oyeleke, Bret T Petersen, Alessandro Repici, Payal Saxena, Amrita Sethi, Reem Z Sharaiha, Marco Spadaccini, Raymond Shing-Yan Tang, Christopher W Teshima, Mariano Villarroel, Jeanin E van Hooft, Rogier P Voermans, Daniel von Renteln, Catharine M Walsh, Tricia Aberin, Dawn Banavage, Jowell A Chen, James Clancy, Heather Drake, Melanie Im, Chooi Peng Low, Alexandra Myszko, Krista Navarro, Jessica Redman, Wayne Reyes, Faina Weinstein, Sunil Gupta, Ahmed H Mokhtar, Caleb Na, Daniel Tham, Yusuke Fujiyoshi, Tony He, Sharan B Malipatil, Reza Gholami, Nikko Gimpaya, Arjun Kundra, Samir C Grover, Natalia S Causada Calo","doi":"10.1055/a-2427-3893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Use of fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy is an essential aid in advanced endoscopic interventions. However, it also raises concerns about radiation exposure. This study aimed to develop consensus-based statements for safe and effective use of fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy, prioritizing the safety and well-being of healthcare workers and patients. <b>Methods</b> A modified Delphi approach was employed to achieve consensus over three rounds of surveys. Proposed statements were generated in Round 1. In the second round, panelists rated potential statements on a 5-point scale, with consensus defined as ≥80% agreement. Statements were subsequently prioritized in Round 3, using a 1 (lowest priority) to 10 (highest priority) scale. <b>Results</b> Forty-six experts participated, consisting of 34 therapeutic endoscopists and 12 endoscopy nurses from six continents, with an overall 45.6% female representation (n = 21). Forty-three item statements were generated in the first round. Of these, 31 statements achieved consensus after the second round. These statements were categorized into General Considerations (n = 6), Education (n = 10), Pregnancy (n = 4), Family Planning (n = 2), Patient Safety (n = 4), and Staff Safety (n = 5). In the third round, accepted statements received mean priority scores ranging from 7.28 to 9.36, with 87.2% of statements rated as very high priority (mean score ≥ 9). <b>Conclusions</b> This study presents consensus-based statements for safe and effective use of fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy, addressing the well-being of healthcare workers and patients. These consensus-based statements aim to mitigate risks associated with radiation exposure while maintaining benefits of fluoroscopy, ultimately promoting a culture of safety in healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 11","pages":"E1315-E1325"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2427-3893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and study aims Use of fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy is an essential aid in advanced endoscopic interventions. However, it also raises concerns about radiation exposure. This study aimed to develop consensus-based statements for safe and effective use of fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy, prioritizing the safety and well-being of healthcare workers and patients. Methods A modified Delphi approach was employed to achieve consensus over three rounds of surveys. Proposed statements were generated in Round 1. In the second round, panelists rated potential statements on a 5-point scale, with consensus defined as ≥80% agreement. Statements were subsequently prioritized in Round 3, using a 1 (lowest priority) to 10 (highest priority) scale. Results Forty-six experts participated, consisting of 34 therapeutic endoscopists and 12 endoscopy nurses from six continents, with an overall 45.6% female representation (n = 21). Forty-three item statements were generated in the first round. Of these, 31 statements achieved consensus after the second round. These statements were categorized into General Considerations (n = 6), Education (n = 10), Pregnancy (n = 4), Family Planning (n = 2), Patient Safety (n = 4), and Staff Safety (n = 5). In the third round, accepted statements received mean priority scores ranging from 7.28 to 9.36, with 87.2% of statements rated as very high priority (mean score ≥ 9). Conclusions This study presents consensus-based statements for safe and effective use of fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy, addressing the well-being of healthcare workers and patients. These consensus-based statements aim to mitigate risks associated with radiation exposure while maintaining benefits of fluoroscopy, ultimately promoting a culture of safety in healthcare settings.