Characterizing the relationship between psychosis and violence in the forensic psychiatric population: a systematic review.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Angad Singh, William Pereira, Sapriya Birk, Mark Mohan Kaggwa, John M W Bradford, Gary Chaimowitz, Andrew Toyin Olagunju
{"title":"Characterizing the relationship between psychosis and violence in the forensic psychiatric population: a systematic review.","authors":"Angad Singh, William Pereira, Sapriya Birk, Mark Mohan Kaggwa, John M W Bradford, Gary Chaimowitz, Andrew Toyin Olagunju","doi":"10.1017/S1092852924000488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The relationship between psychosis and violence is often construed focusing on a narrow panel of factors; however, recent evidence suggests violence might be linked to a complex interplay of biopsychosocial factors among forensic psychiatric patients with psychosis (FPPP). This review describes violence incidents in FPPP, the factors associated with violence, and relevant implications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was conducted following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guideline. Databases, including CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline/PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science, were searched for eligible studies that examined violence among adult FPPP. Screening of reports and data extraction were completed by at least two independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the 29 included studies, violence was consistently related to prior contact with psychiatric services, active psychotic symptoms, impulsivity, adverse experiences, and low social support. However, FPPP who reported violence varied in most other biopsychosocial domains, suggesting the underlying combinatorial effects of multiple risk factors for violence rather than individual factors. Variability in violence was addressed by stratifying FPPP into subgroups using composite/aggregate of identifiable factors (including gender, onset/course of illness, system-related, and other biopsychosocial factors) to identify FPPP with similar risk profiles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are multiple explanatory pathways to violence in FPPP. Recent studies identify subgroups with underlying similarities or risk profiles for violence. There is a need for future prospective studies to replicate the clinical utility of stratifying FPPP into subgroups and integrate emerging evidence using recent advancements in technology and data mining to improve risk assessment, prediction, and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10505,"journal":{"name":"CNS Spectrums","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS Spectrums","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852924000488","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The relationship between psychosis and violence is often construed focusing on a narrow panel of factors; however, recent evidence suggests violence might be linked to a complex interplay of biopsychosocial factors among forensic psychiatric patients with psychosis (FPPP). This review describes violence incidents in FPPP, the factors associated with violence, and relevant implications.

Methods: This review was conducted following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guideline. Databases, including CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline/PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science, were searched for eligible studies that examined violence among adult FPPP. Screening of reports and data extraction were completed by at least two independent reviewers.

Results: Across the 29 included studies, violence was consistently related to prior contact with psychiatric services, active psychotic symptoms, impulsivity, adverse experiences, and low social support. However, FPPP who reported violence varied in most other biopsychosocial domains, suggesting the underlying combinatorial effects of multiple risk factors for violence rather than individual factors. Variability in violence was addressed by stratifying FPPP into subgroups using composite/aggregate of identifiable factors (including gender, onset/course of illness, system-related, and other biopsychosocial factors) to identify FPPP with similar risk profiles.

Conclusions: There are multiple explanatory pathways to violence in FPPP. Recent studies identify subgroups with underlying similarities or risk profiles for violence. There is a need for future prospective studies to replicate the clinical utility of stratifying FPPP into subgroups and integrate emerging evidence using recent advancements in technology and data mining to improve risk assessment, prediction, and management.

描述法医精神病人群中精神病与暴力之间的关系:系统性综述。
目的:精神病与暴力之间的关系往往集中在一系列狭隘的因素上;然而,最近的证据表明,在患有精神病的法医精神病患者(FPPP)中,暴力可能与复杂的生物-心理-社会因素相互作用有关。本综述描述了精神病法医患者中的暴力事件、与暴力有关的因素以及相关影响:本综述按照系统综述和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行。我们在 CINAHL、EMBASE、Medline/PubMed、PsycINFO 和 Web of Science 等数据库中检索了符合条件的研究,这些研究对成年 FPPP 中的暴力行为进行了调查。报告筛选和数据提取至少由两名独立审稿人完成:结果:在纳入的 29 项研究中,暴力行为始终与之前接触过精神科服务、活跃的精神病症状、冲动、不良经历和社会支持度低等因素相关。然而,报告暴力事件的 FPPP 在大多数其他生物-心理-社会领域存在差异,这表明暴力事件的多种风险因素具有潜在的组合效应,而非个别因素。为了解决暴力的差异性问题,研究人员利用可识别因素(包括性别、发病/病程、与系统相关的因素以及其他生物心理社会因素)的综合/总和,将FPPP分为不同的亚组,以确定具有相似风险特征的FPPP:结论:FPPP 中的暴力行为有多种解释途径。最近的研究确定了具有潜在相似性或暴力风险特征的亚组。未来有必要开展前瞻性研究,以复制将 FPPP 分层为亚组的临床实用性,并利用最新的技术进步和数据挖掘来整合新出现的证据,以改进风险评估、预测和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CNS Spectrums
CNS Spectrums 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
239
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CNS Spectrums covers all aspects of the clinical neurosciences, neurotherapeutics, and neuropsychopharmacology, particularly those pertinent to the clinician and clinical investigator. The journal features focused, in-depth reviews, perspectives, and original research articles. New therapeutics of all types in psychiatry, mental health, and neurology are emphasized, especially first in man studies, proof of concept studies, and translational basic neuroscience studies. Subject coverage spans the full spectrum of neuropsychiatry, focusing on those crossing traditional boundaries between neurology and psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信