Oral Corticosteroid-Related Healthcare Resource Utilization and Associated Costs in Patients with COPD.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Gary Tse, Cono Ariti, Mona Bafadhel, Alberto Papi, Victoria Carter, Jiandong Zhou, Derek Skinner, Xiao Xu, Hana Müllerová, Benjamin Emmanuel, David Price
{"title":"Oral Corticosteroid-Related Healthcare Resource Utilization and Associated Costs in Patients with COPD.","authors":"Gary Tse, Cono Ariti, Mona Bafadhel, Alberto Papi, Victoria Carter, Jiandong Zhou, Derek Skinner, Xiao Xu, Hana Müllerová, Benjamin Emmanuel, David Price","doi":"10.1007/s12325-024-03024-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are used to manage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations but are associated with adverse outcomes that may increase healthcare resource utilization and costs. We compared attendance/costs associated with OCS-related adverse outcomes in patients who ever used OCS versus those who never used OCS and examined associations between cumulative OCS exposure and attendance/costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This direct matched observational cohort study used the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD database (data range 1987-2019). Patients with a COPD diagnosis on/after April 1, 2003, and Hospital Episode Statistics linkage were included. Emergency room, specialist or primary care outpatient, and inpatient attendance were analyzed. Costs, estimated using Health and Social Care 2019 and National Health Service Reference Costs 2019-2020 reports, were adjusted for sex, age, exacerbation number, and inhaler type used in the 12 months before index date.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The OCS cohort had higher annualized disease-specific (excluding respiratory) total attendance/costs versus the non-OCS cohort (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) ranging from 37% (1.37 [1.31, 1.43]) for emergency room attendances to 149% (2.49 [2.36, 2.63]) for specialist consultations. Disease-specific (excluding respiratory) attendance/costs increased in a positive dose-response relationship for most attendance categories versus the < 0.5 g reference dose. For the 0.5 to < 1.0 g cumulative dose category, the greatest increases in disease-specific (excluding respiratory) attendance/costs occurred for primary care consultations (aIRR [95% CI] 1.38 [1.32, 1.44]). For the ≥ 10 g cumulative dose category, the greatest increases were observed for primary care consultations (aIRR [95% CI] 2.83 [2.66, 3.00]), non-elective long stays (≥ 2 days; 2.54 [2.15, 2.99]), and non-elective short stays (≤ 1 day; 2.51 [2.12, 2.98]). Similar findings were observed for all-cause attendance/costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among patients with COPD, OCS-related adverse outcomes were associated with higher attendance and costs, with a positive dose-response relationship. A graphical abstract is available with this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-024-03024-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are used to manage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations but are associated with adverse outcomes that may increase healthcare resource utilization and costs. We compared attendance/costs associated with OCS-related adverse outcomes in patients who ever used OCS versus those who never used OCS and examined associations between cumulative OCS exposure and attendance/costs.

Methods: This direct matched observational cohort study used the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD database (data range 1987-2019). Patients with a COPD diagnosis on/after April 1, 2003, and Hospital Episode Statistics linkage were included. Emergency room, specialist or primary care outpatient, and inpatient attendance were analyzed. Costs, estimated using Health and Social Care 2019 and National Health Service Reference Costs 2019-2020 reports, were adjusted for sex, age, exacerbation number, and inhaler type used in the 12 months before index date.

Results: The OCS cohort had higher annualized disease-specific (excluding respiratory) total attendance/costs versus the non-OCS cohort (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) ranging from 37% (1.37 [1.31, 1.43]) for emergency room attendances to 149% (2.49 [2.36, 2.63]) for specialist consultations. Disease-specific (excluding respiratory) attendance/costs increased in a positive dose-response relationship for most attendance categories versus the < 0.5 g reference dose. For the 0.5 to < 1.0 g cumulative dose category, the greatest increases in disease-specific (excluding respiratory) attendance/costs occurred for primary care consultations (aIRR [95% CI] 1.38 [1.32, 1.44]). For the ≥ 10 g cumulative dose category, the greatest increases were observed for primary care consultations (aIRR [95% CI] 2.83 [2.66, 3.00]), non-elective long stays (≥ 2 days; 2.54 [2.15, 2.99]), and non-elective short stays (≤ 1 day; 2.51 [2.12, 2.98]). Similar findings were observed for all-cause attendance/costs.

Conclusion: Among patients with COPD, OCS-related adverse outcomes were associated with higher attendance and costs, with a positive dose-response relationship. A graphical abstract is available with this article.

慢性阻塞性肺病患者与口服皮质类固醇相关的医疗资源利用率和相关成本。
导言:口服皮质类固醇(OCS)用于控制慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的恶化,但其不良后果可能会增加医疗资源的利用率和成本。我们比较了曾经使用过口服皮质类固醇与从未使用过口服皮质类固醇的患者中与口服皮质类固醇相关不良后果有关的就诊/费用,并研究了累积口服皮质类固醇暴露与就诊/费用之间的关联:这项直接匹配的观察性队列研究使用了英国临床实践研究数据链 GOLD 数据库(数据范围为 1987-2019)。研究纳入了在 2003 年 4 月 1 日/之后诊断出慢性阻塞性肺病的患者,并与医院病历统计进行了连接。对急诊室、专科或初级保健门诊以及住院病人的就诊情况进行了分析。使用《2019年健康与社会保健》和《2019-2020年国家卫生服务参考成本》报告估算成本,并根据指数日期前12个月中使用的吸入器类型对性别、年龄、加重次数进行调整:与非OCS队列相比,OCS队列的年化特定疾病(不包括呼吸系统)总就诊人次/费用较高(调整后发病率比[aIRR],95%置信区间[CIs]),从急诊就诊人次的37% (1.37 [1.31, 1.43])到专家会诊的149% (2.49 [2.36, 2.63])不等。与结论相比,大多数就诊类别的疾病特异性(不包括呼吸系统)就诊人次/费用呈正剂量反应关系:在慢性阻塞性肺病患者中,OCS相关不良后果与就诊率和费用的增加有关,且呈正剂量反应关系。本文附有图表摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信