Linking leaf dark respiration to leaf traits and reflectance spectroscopy across diverse forest types.

IF 9.4 1区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
New Phytologist Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1111/nph.20267
Fengqi Wu, Shuwen Liu, Julien Lamour, Owen K Atkin, Nan Yang, Tingting Dong, Weiying Xu, Nicholas G Smith, Zhihui Wang, Han Wang, Yanjun Su, Xiaojuan Liu, Yue Shi, Aijun Xing, Guanhua Dai, Jinlong Dong, Nathan G Swenson, Jens Kattge, Peter B Reich, Shawn P Serbin, Alistair Rogers, Jin Wu, Zhengbing Yan
{"title":"Linking leaf dark respiration to leaf traits and reflectance spectroscopy across diverse forest types.","authors":"Fengqi Wu, Shuwen Liu, Julien Lamour, Owen K Atkin, Nan Yang, Tingting Dong, Weiying Xu, Nicholas G Smith, Zhihui Wang, Han Wang, Yanjun Su, Xiaojuan Liu, Yue Shi, Aijun Xing, Guanhua Dai, Jinlong Dong, Nathan G Swenson, Jens Kattge, Peter B Reich, Shawn P Serbin, Alistair Rogers, Jin Wu, Zhengbing Yan","doi":"10.1111/nph.20267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Leaf dark respiration (R<sub>dark</sub>), an important yet rarely quantified component of carbon cycling in forest ecosystems, is often simulated from leaf traits such as the maximum carboxylation capacity (V<sub>cmax</sub>), leaf mass per area (LMA), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations, in terrestrial biosphere models. However, the validity of these relationships across forest types remains to be thoroughly assessed. Here, we analyzed R<sub>dark</sub> variability and its associations with V<sub>cmax</sub> and other leaf traits across three temperate, subtropical and tropical forests in China, evaluating the effectiveness of leaf spectroscopy as a superior monitoring alternative. We found that leaf magnesium and calcium concentrations were more significant in explaining cross-site R<sub>dark</sub> than commonly used traits like LMA, N and P concentrations, but univariate trait-R<sub>dark</sub> relationships were always weak (r<sup>2</sup> ≤ 0.15) and forest-specific. Although multivariate relationships of leaf traits improved the model performance, leaf spectroscopy outperformed trait-R<sub>dark</sub> relationships, accurately predicted cross-site R<sub>dark</sub> (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.65) and pinpointed the factors contributing to R<sub>dark</sub> variability. Our findings reveal a few novel traits with greater cross-site scalability regarding R<sub>dark</sub>, challenging the use of empirical trait-R<sub>dark</sub> relationships in process models and emphasize the potential of leaf spectroscopy as a promising alternative for estimating R<sub>dark</sub>, which could ultimately improve process modeling of terrestrial plant respiration.</p>","PeriodicalId":48887,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20267","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Leaf dark respiration (Rdark), an important yet rarely quantified component of carbon cycling in forest ecosystems, is often simulated from leaf traits such as the maximum carboxylation capacity (Vcmax), leaf mass per area (LMA), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations, in terrestrial biosphere models. However, the validity of these relationships across forest types remains to be thoroughly assessed. Here, we analyzed Rdark variability and its associations with Vcmax and other leaf traits across three temperate, subtropical and tropical forests in China, evaluating the effectiveness of leaf spectroscopy as a superior monitoring alternative. We found that leaf magnesium and calcium concentrations were more significant in explaining cross-site Rdark than commonly used traits like LMA, N and P concentrations, but univariate trait-Rdark relationships were always weak (r2 ≤ 0.15) and forest-specific. Although multivariate relationships of leaf traits improved the model performance, leaf spectroscopy outperformed trait-Rdark relationships, accurately predicted cross-site Rdark (r2 = 0.65) and pinpointed the factors contributing to Rdark variability. Our findings reveal a few novel traits with greater cross-site scalability regarding Rdark, challenging the use of empirical trait-Rdark relationships in process models and emphasize the potential of leaf spectroscopy as a promising alternative for estimating Rdark, which could ultimately improve process modeling of terrestrial plant respiration.

将不同森林类型的叶片暗呼吸与叶片特征和反射光谱学联系起来。
叶片暗呼吸(Rdark)是森林生态系统中碳循环的一个重要组成部分,但却很少被量化。在陆地生物圈模型中,叶片暗呼吸通常是通过叶片的特征(如最大羧化能力(Vcmax)、叶片单位面积质量(LMA)、氮(N)和磷(P)浓度)来模拟的。然而,这些关系在不同森林类型中的有效性仍有待全面评估。在这里,我们分析了 Rdark 变异性及其与 Vcmax 和其他叶片特征的关系,涉及中国的三类温带、亚热带和热带森林,评估了叶片光谱作为一种优质监测替代方法的有效性。我们发现,叶片镁和钙的浓度比 LMA、氮和磷的浓度等常用性状在解释跨地点 Rdark 方面更为显著,但是单变量性状与 Rdark 的关系总是很弱(r2 ≤ 0.15),而且具有森林特异性。虽然叶片性状的多变量关系提高了模型的性能,但叶片光谱学优于性状-Rdark 关系,能准确预测跨地点 Rdark(r2 = 0.65),并能精确定位导致 Rdark 变异的因素。我们的研究结果揭示了一些新的性状,这些性状在Rdark方面具有更大的跨位点可扩展性,这对在过程模型中使用经验性性状-Rdark关系提出了挑战,并强调了叶光谱作为估算Rdark的一种有前途的替代方法的潜力,最终可改进陆生植物呼吸过程模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New Phytologist
New Phytologist PLANT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
728
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: New Phytologist is a leading publication that showcases exceptional and groundbreaking research in plant science and its practical applications. With a focus on five distinct sections - Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology - the journal covers a wide array of topics ranging from cellular processes to the impact of global environmental changes. We encourage the use of interdisciplinary approaches, and our content is structured to reflect this. Our journal acknowledges the diverse techniques employed in plant science, including molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches, across various subfields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信