Bringing together but staying apart: decisive differences in animal and fungal mitochondrial inner membrane fusion.

IF 11 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Hassan Hashimi, Ondřej Gahura, Tomáš Pánek
{"title":"Bringing together but staying apart: decisive differences in animal and fungal mitochondrial inner membrane fusion.","authors":"Hassan Hashimi, Ondřej Gahura, Tomáš Pánek","doi":"10.1111/brv.13168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mitochondria are dynamic and plastic, undergoing continuous fission and fusion and rearrangement of their bioenergetic sub-compartments called cristae. These fascinating processes are best understood in animal and fungal models, which are taxonomically grouped together in the expansive Opisthokonta supergroup. In opisthokonts, crista remodelling and inner membrane fusion are linked by dynamin-related proteins (DRPs). Animal Opa1 (optical atrophy 1) and fungal Mgm1 (mitochondrial genome maintenance 1) are tacitly considered orthologs because their similar mitochondria-shaping roles are mediated by seemingly shared biochemical properties, and due to their presence in the two major opisthokontan subdivisions, Holozoa and Holomycota, respectively. However, molecular phylogenetics challenges this notion, suggesting that Opa1 and Mgm1 likely had separate, albeit convergent, evolutionary paths. Herein, we illuminate disparities in proteolytic processing, structure, and interaction network that may have bestowed on Opa1 and Mgm1 distinct mechanisms of membrane remodelling. A key disparity is that, unlike Mgm1, Opa1 directly recruits the mitochondrial phospholipid cardiolipin to remodel membranes. The differences outlined herein between the two DRPs could have broader impacts on mitochondrial morphogenesis. Outer and inner membrane fusion are autonomous in animals, which may have freed Opa1 to repurpose its intrinsic activity to remodel cristae, thereby regulating the formation of respiratory chain supercomplexes. More significantly, Opa1-mediated crista remodelling has emerged as an integral part of cytochrome c-regulated apoptosis in vertebrates, and perhaps in the cenancestor of animals. By contrast, outer and inner membrane fusion are coupled in budding yeast. Consequently, Mgm1 membrane-fusion activity is inextricable from its role in the biogenesis of fungal lamellar cristae. These disparate mitochondrial DRPs ultimately may have contributed to the different modes of multicellularity that have evolved within Opisthokonta.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.13168","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mitochondria are dynamic and plastic, undergoing continuous fission and fusion and rearrangement of their bioenergetic sub-compartments called cristae. These fascinating processes are best understood in animal and fungal models, which are taxonomically grouped together in the expansive Opisthokonta supergroup. In opisthokonts, crista remodelling and inner membrane fusion are linked by dynamin-related proteins (DRPs). Animal Opa1 (optical atrophy 1) and fungal Mgm1 (mitochondrial genome maintenance 1) are tacitly considered orthologs because their similar mitochondria-shaping roles are mediated by seemingly shared biochemical properties, and due to their presence in the two major opisthokontan subdivisions, Holozoa and Holomycota, respectively. However, molecular phylogenetics challenges this notion, suggesting that Opa1 and Mgm1 likely had separate, albeit convergent, evolutionary paths. Herein, we illuminate disparities in proteolytic processing, structure, and interaction network that may have bestowed on Opa1 and Mgm1 distinct mechanisms of membrane remodelling. A key disparity is that, unlike Mgm1, Opa1 directly recruits the mitochondrial phospholipid cardiolipin to remodel membranes. The differences outlined herein between the two DRPs could have broader impacts on mitochondrial morphogenesis. Outer and inner membrane fusion are autonomous in animals, which may have freed Opa1 to repurpose its intrinsic activity to remodel cristae, thereby regulating the formation of respiratory chain supercomplexes. More significantly, Opa1-mediated crista remodelling has emerged as an integral part of cytochrome c-regulated apoptosis in vertebrates, and perhaps in the cenancestor of animals. By contrast, outer and inner membrane fusion are coupled in budding yeast. Consequently, Mgm1 membrane-fusion activity is inextricable from its role in the biogenesis of fungal lamellar cristae. These disparate mitochondrial DRPs ultimately may have contributed to the different modes of multicellularity that have evolved within Opisthokonta.

聚而不散:动物和真菌线粒体内膜融合的决定性差异。
线粒体充满活力和可塑性,不断发生裂变和融合,并重新排列称为嵴的生物能亚区。这些迷人的过程在动物和真菌模型中得到了最好的理解,它们在分类学上被归入广义的 Opisthokonta 超群。在 Opisthokonts 中,嵴重塑和内膜融合是由动态相关蛋白(DRPs)联系在一起的。动物的 Opa1(光学萎缩 1)和真菌的 Mgm1(线粒体基因组维护 1)被默认为是同源物,因为它们类似的线粒体塑形作用由看似共享的生化特性介导,而且它们分别存在于两个主要的 opisthokontan 分支--全息动物门和全息真菌门。然而,分子系统发育学对这一观点提出了质疑,认为 Opa1 和 Mgm1 很可能有着不同的进化路径,尽管是趋同的。在这里,我们阐明了蛋白水解过程、结构和相互作用网络中的差异,这些差异可能赋予了 Opa1 和 Mgm1 不同的膜重塑机制。一个关键的差异是,与 Mgm1 不同,Opa1 直接招募线粒体磷脂心磷脂来重塑膜。本文概述的两种 DRP 之间的差异可能会对线粒体的形态发生产生更广泛的影响。动物的外膜和内膜融合是自主的,这可能使 Opa1 能够重新利用其内在活性重塑嵴,从而调节呼吸链超级复合物的形成。更重要的是,在脊椎动物中,Opa1 介导的嵴重塑已成为细胞色素 c 调节的细胞凋亡的一个组成部分,或许在动物中也是如此。相比之下,在芽殖酵母中,外膜和内膜的融合是耦合的。因此,Mgm1 的膜融合活性与其在真菌片状嵴的生物形成中的作用密不可分。这些不同的线粒体 DRPs 最终可能导致了 Opisthokonta 演化出不同的多细胞模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Reviews
Biological Reviews 生物-生物学
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly. The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions. The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field. Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信