Interstitial Lung Abnormalities on Unselected Abdominal and Thoracoabdominal CT Scans in 21 118 Patients.

IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Radiology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1148/radiol.233374
Nicola Sverzellati, Gianluca Milanese, Christopher J Ryerson, Hiroto Hatabu, Simon L F Walsh, Vito Roberto Papapietro, Silvia Eleonora Gazzani, Emanuele Bacchini, Francesco Specchia, Cristina Marrocchio, Francesca Milone, Roberta Eufrasia Ledda, Mario Silva, Elisa Iezzi
{"title":"Interstitial Lung Abnormalities on Unselected Abdominal and Thoracoabdominal CT Scans in 21 118 Patients.","authors":"Nicola Sverzellati, Gianluca Milanese, Christopher J Ryerson, Hiroto Hatabu, Simon L F Walsh, Vito Roberto Papapietro, Silvia Eleonora Gazzani, Emanuele Bacchini, Francesco Specchia, Cristina Marrocchio, Francesca Milone, Roberta Eufrasia Ledda, Mario Silva, Elisa Iezzi","doi":"10.1148/radiol.233374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are incidental CT findings suggesting early interstitial lung disease. However ILA prevalence data are scarce in an unselected routine clinical setting. Purpose To evaluate the prevalence, underreporting rate, and potential clinical impact of ILAs recognizable on either abdominal CT scans or thoracoabdominal CT scans in a routine clinical setting of unselected patients. Materials and Methods Consecutive abdominal or thoracoabdominal CT scans from unselected inpatients and outpatients (age, ≥50 years; without any available prior chest CT and no clinical history of disease against the diagnosis of ILA) from a single-center tertiary hospital between January 2008 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of ILAs and compared with the original clinical reports from the CT scans. Radiologic progression of ILA was evaluated by comparing consecutive CT points. Multivariable models adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, oncologic disease, and cardiovascular disease were used to assess factors associated with odds of ILAs progression and all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Results Among 21 118 patients (median age, 72 years [IQR, 64-80 years]; 11 028 [52.2%] female patients), ILAs were observed in 362 (1.7%) patients, notably in 222 (1.0%) patients who had fibrotic features at CT. ILAs were recognized in 122 of 9415 (1.3%) and 240 of 11 703 (2.1%) of abdominal and thoracoabdominal CT scans, respectively. Of available original reports for 360 patients, 158 (43.9%) of all ILAs were not originally reported. Traction bronchiectasis index was the CT factor associated with higher odds of ILA progression (odds ratio, 3.47; 95% CI: 1.83, 6.58; <i>P</i> < .001). Fibrotic ILAs had a fourfold higher risk of respiratory-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 4.01; 95% CI: 2.02, 7.92; <i>P</i> < .001) compared with patients without ILAs. Conclusion The prevalence of ILAs was 1.7% in a large, unselected sample of patients who underwent either abdominal or thoracoabdominal CT for various clinical indications. Despite their prognostic significance, 43.9% of ILAs were unreported. © RSNA, 2024 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Hata in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"313 2","pages":"e233374"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.233374","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are incidental CT findings suggesting early interstitial lung disease. However ILA prevalence data are scarce in an unselected routine clinical setting. Purpose To evaluate the prevalence, underreporting rate, and potential clinical impact of ILAs recognizable on either abdominal CT scans or thoracoabdominal CT scans in a routine clinical setting of unselected patients. Materials and Methods Consecutive abdominal or thoracoabdominal CT scans from unselected inpatients and outpatients (age, ≥50 years; without any available prior chest CT and no clinical history of disease against the diagnosis of ILA) from a single-center tertiary hospital between January 2008 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of ILAs and compared with the original clinical reports from the CT scans. Radiologic progression of ILA was evaluated by comparing consecutive CT points. Multivariable models adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, oncologic disease, and cardiovascular disease were used to assess factors associated with odds of ILAs progression and all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Results Among 21 118 patients (median age, 72 years [IQR, 64-80 years]; 11 028 [52.2%] female patients), ILAs were observed in 362 (1.7%) patients, notably in 222 (1.0%) patients who had fibrotic features at CT. ILAs were recognized in 122 of 9415 (1.3%) and 240 of 11 703 (2.1%) of abdominal and thoracoabdominal CT scans, respectively. Of available original reports for 360 patients, 158 (43.9%) of all ILAs were not originally reported. Traction bronchiectasis index was the CT factor associated with higher odds of ILA progression (odds ratio, 3.47; 95% CI: 1.83, 6.58; P < .001). Fibrotic ILAs had a fourfold higher risk of respiratory-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 4.01; 95% CI: 2.02, 7.92; P < .001) compared with patients without ILAs. Conclusion The prevalence of ILAs was 1.7% in a large, unselected sample of patients who underwent either abdominal or thoracoabdominal CT for various clinical indications. Despite their prognostic significance, 43.9% of ILAs were unreported. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Hata in this issue.

21 118 名患者未选择的腹部和胸腹部 CT 扫描显示间质性肺异常。
背景间质性肺异常(ILAs)是提示早期间质性肺疾病的偶然 CT 发现。然而,在未经选择的常规临床环境中,ILA 的发病率数据很少。目的 评估在未经选择的常规临床环境中,腹部 CT 扫描或胸腹部 CT 扫描可识别的 ILA 的患病率、漏报率和潜在的临床影响。材料和方法 对一家单中心三甲医院在 2008 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月间连续进行的腹部或胸腹部 CT 扫描进行回顾性审查,以确定是否存在 ILA,并将其与 CT 扫描的原始临床报告进行比较。通过比较连续的CT点来评估ILA的放射学进展。使用调整了年龄、性别、种族/民族、肿瘤疾病和心血管疾病的多变量模型来评估与 ILAs 进展几率以及全因和特定原因死亡率相关的因素。结果 在 21 118 例患者(中位年龄 72 岁 [IQR,64-80 岁];女性患者 11 028 例 [52.2%])中,362 例(1.7%)患者观察到 ILAs,尤其是 222 例(1.0%)患者在 CT 检查中出现纤维化特征。在9415例(1.3%)和11703例(2.1%)腹部和胸腹部CT扫描中,分别有122例和240例发现了ILA。在 360 例患者的原始报告中,有 158 例(43.9%)的 ILA 最初未被报告。牵引性支气管扩张指数是与ILA进展几率较高相关的CT因素(几率比为3.47;95% CI:1.83,6.58;P < .001)。与无 ILA 的患者相比,纤维化 ILA 患者因呼吸系统原因死亡的风险高出四倍(危险比为 4.01;95% CI:2.02, 7.92;P < .001)。结论 在大量未经选择的样本中,因各种临床适应症接受腹部或胸腹部 CT 检查的患者中,ILA 的发病率为 1.7%。尽管 ILA 对预后具有重要意义,但仍有 43.9% 的 ILA 未被报告。©RSNA,2024 这篇文章有补充材料。另请参阅本期 Hata 的社论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiology
Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
35.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
596
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: Published regularly since 1923 by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), Radiology has long been recognized as the authoritative reference for the most current, clinically relevant and highest quality research in the field of radiology. Each month the journal publishes approximately 240 pages of peer-reviewed original research, authoritative reviews, well-balanced commentary on significant articles, and expert opinion on new techniques and technologies. Radiology publishes cutting edge and impactful imaging research articles in radiology and medical imaging in order to help improve human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信