Application of Intraoperative Ultrasound in Laparoscopic Liver Resection with Pringle Maneuver: A Comparative Study with the Pringle Maneuver.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Gang Xiao, Haijun Tang, Baochun Lu
{"title":"Application of Intraoperative Ultrasound in Laparoscopic Liver Resection with Pringle Maneuver: A Comparative Study with the Pringle Maneuver.","authors":"Gang Xiao, Haijun Tang, Baochun Lu","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Appropriate surgical techniques for controlling bleeding and preserving residual liver function are key to the success of laparoscopic liver resection. This study aims to evaluate the application effect of intraoperative ultrasound in the Pringle maneuver of laparoscopic liver resection. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Between January 2022 and June 2023, 100 patients underwent laparoscopic liver resection and were randomly allocated to receive application of intraoperative ultrasound for Pringle maneuver (intraoperative ultrasound group, <i>n</i> = 50) or conventional Pringle maneuver (conventional group, <i>n</i> = 50). Intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, operation time, hepatic portal block time, complications (bile leakage, hemorrhage, ascites, and posthepatectomy liver failure), and hospital stay were compared between groups, along with the alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and total bilirubin (TB) levels at postoperative days 1, 3, and 7. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The operation time, postoperative ALT, AST, and TB levels on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, complications (bile leakage, hemorrhage, ascites, and posthepatectomy liver failures), and hospital stay were comparable between groups. Compared with the conventional group, the intraoperative ultrasound group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss (<i>P</i> = .015), lower blood transfusion rate (<i>P</i> = .035), and less hepatic portal block time (<i>P</i> = .012). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Applying intraoperative ultrasound in laparoscopic liver resection for hepatic pedicle occlusion is a safe, simple, and effective method.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0153","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Appropriate surgical techniques for controlling bleeding and preserving residual liver function are key to the success of laparoscopic liver resection. This study aims to evaluate the application effect of intraoperative ultrasound in the Pringle maneuver of laparoscopic liver resection. Materials and Methods: Between January 2022 and June 2023, 100 patients underwent laparoscopic liver resection and were randomly allocated to receive application of intraoperative ultrasound for Pringle maneuver (intraoperative ultrasound group, n = 50) or conventional Pringle maneuver (conventional group, n = 50). Intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, operation time, hepatic portal block time, complications (bile leakage, hemorrhage, ascites, and posthepatectomy liver failure), and hospital stay were compared between groups, along with the alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and total bilirubin (TB) levels at postoperative days 1, 3, and 7. Results: The operation time, postoperative ALT, AST, and TB levels on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, complications (bile leakage, hemorrhage, ascites, and posthepatectomy liver failures), and hospital stay were comparable between groups. Compared with the conventional group, the intraoperative ultrasound group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss (P = .015), lower blood transfusion rate (P = .035), and less hepatic portal block time (P = .012). Conclusions: Applying intraoperative ultrasound in laparoscopic liver resection for hepatic pedicle occlusion is a safe, simple, and effective method.

腹腔镜肝切除术中普林格尔手法术中超声的应用:与普林格尔手法的比较研究
背景:控制出血和保留残余肝功能的适当手术技巧是腹腔镜肝切除术成功的关键。本研究旨在评估术中超声在腹腔镜肝切除术 Pringle 操作中的应用效果。材料与方法:2022年1月至2023年6月期间,100名患者接受了腹腔镜肝切除术,随机分配接受术中超声波普林格尔操作(术中超声波组,n = 50)或传统普林格尔操作(传统组,n = 50)。比较两组的术中失血量、输血量、手术时间、肝门阻断时间、并发症(胆汁渗漏、出血、腹水和肝切除术后肝功能衰竭)和住院时间,以及术后第1、3和7天的丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)和总胆红素(TB)水平。结果两组的手术时间、术后第 1、3 和 7 天的谷丙转氨酶、谷草转氨酶和总胆红素水平、并发症(胆汁渗漏、出血、腹水和肝切除术后肝功能衰竭)和住院时间相当。与传统组相比,术中超声组的术中失血量明显更少(P = 0.015),输血率更低(P = 0.035),肝门阻滞时间更短(P = 0.012)。结论在腹腔镜肝切除术中应用术中超声治疗肝门梗阻是一种安全、简单、有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信