Comparative effects of topiramate and naltrexone on neural activity during anticipatory anxiety in individuals with alcohol use disorder.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Gezelle Dali, Warren Logge, Henry R Kranzler, Tristan Hurzeler, Hugh Gallagher, Paul S Haber, Kirsten C Morley
{"title":"Comparative effects of topiramate and naltrexone on neural activity during anticipatory anxiety in individuals with alcohol use disorder.","authors":"Gezelle Dali, Warren Logge, Henry R Kranzler, Tristan Hurzeler, Hugh Gallagher, Paul S Haber, Kirsten C Morley","doi":"10.1093/alcalc/agae078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Topiramate has been found to be effective in reducing alcohol use and may also attenuate anxiety severity in patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD). This study compared the neural response of treatment-seeking patients with AUD on either topiramate or naltrexone during an anticipatory anxiety task. Participants were 42 patients with AUD who were randomized to receive either topiramate (n = 23; titrated dose up to 200 mg/day) or naltrexone (n = 19; 50 mg/day) for 12-weeks as part of a larger randomized controlled trial. Following 6 weeks of treatment, participants completed an anticipatory anxiety task during a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) session. The task presented a series of high-threat and low-threat stimuli followed by an unpleasant or pleasant image, respectively. Primary whole-brain analyses revealed no significant differences in neural activation between the topiramate and naltrexone groups. Deactivation for safe cues relative to threat cues was observed within the precuneus, inferior parietal lobule and the cingulate gyrus. In the precentral and middle frontal gyri, threat cues elicited greater activation. Exploratory analyses revealed an effect of change in anxiety from baseline to week 6, with a greater reduction associated with a reduced response to threat cues relative to safe cues in the cuneus and lingual gyrus. The current study is the first to examine and compare neural activation during anticipatory anxiety in treatment-seeking individuals on topiramate and naltrexone. This preliminary research contributes to our understanding of the therapeutic mechanisms of these alcohol pharmacotherapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7407,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol and alcoholism","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol and alcoholism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agae078","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Topiramate has been found to be effective in reducing alcohol use and may also attenuate anxiety severity in patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD). This study compared the neural response of treatment-seeking patients with AUD on either topiramate or naltrexone during an anticipatory anxiety task. Participants were 42 patients with AUD who were randomized to receive either topiramate (n = 23; titrated dose up to 200 mg/day) or naltrexone (n = 19; 50 mg/day) for 12-weeks as part of a larger randomized controlled trial. Following 6 weeks of treatment, participants completed an anticipatory anxiety task during a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) session. The task presented a series of high-threat and low-threat stimuli followed by an unpleasant or pleasant image, respectively. Primary whole-brain analyses revealed no significant differences in neural activation between the topiramate and naltrexone groups. Deactivation for safe cues relative to threat cues was observed within the precuneus, inferior parietal lobule and the cingulate gyrus. In the precentral and middle frontal gyri, threat cues elicited greater activation. Exploratory analyses revealed an effect of change in anxiety from baseline to week 6, with a greater reduction associated with a reduced response to threat cues relative to safe cues in the cuneus and lingual gyrus. The current study is the first to examine and compare neural activation during anticipatory anxiety in treatment-seeking individuals on topiramate and naltrexone. This preliminary research contributes to our understanding of the therapeutic mechanisms of these alcohol pharmacotherapies.

托吡酯和纳曲酮对酒精使用障碍患者预期焦虑时神经活动的比较效应。
研究发现,托吡酯能有效减少酒精使用,还能减轻酒精使用障碍(AUD)患者的焦虑严重程度。本研究比较了寻求治疗的 AUD 患者在预期焦虑任务中对托吡酯或纳曲酮的神经反应。作为一项大型随机对照试验的一部分,42 名 AUD 患者被随机分配接受为期 12 周的托吡酯(n = 23;剂量滴定至 200 毫克/天)或纳曲酮(n = 19;50 毫克/天)治疗。治疗 6 周后,参与者在功能磁共振成像(fMRI)过程中完成一项预期焦虑任务。该任务呈现了一系列高威胁和低威胁刺激,随后分别是令人不快或令人愉快的图像。初级全脑分析显示,托吡酯组和纳曲酮组的神经激活没有显著差异。在楔前、顶叶下部和扣带回中观察到了安全线索相对于威胁线索的失活现象。在前中央区和额叶中回,威胁线索引起了更大的激活。探索性分析表明,从基线到第 6 周的焦虑变化会产生影响,相对于楔回和舌回中的安全线索,焦虑的减轻与威胁线索反应的减少有关。目前的研究首次对服用托吡酯和纳曲酮的寻求治疗者在预期焦虑过程中的神经激活进行了检查和比较。这项初步研究有助于我们了解这些酒精药物疗法的治疗机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alcohol and alcoholism
Alcohol and alcoholism 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
62
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Alcohol and Alcoholism publishes papers on the biomedical, psychological, and sociological aspects of alcoholism and alcohol research, provided that they make a new and significant contribution to knowledge in the field. Papers include new results obtained experimentally, descriptions of new experimental (including clinical) methods of importance to the field of alcohol research and treatment, or new interpretations of existing results. Theoretical contributions are considered equally with papers dealing with experimental work provided that such theoretical contributions are not of a largely speculative or philosophical nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信