Influence of Ocean Currents on Wave Modeling and Satellite Observations: Insights From the One Ocean Expedition

IF 3.3 2区 地球科学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY
Ourania Altiparmaki, Øyvind Breivik, Lotfi Aouf, Patrik Bohlinger, Johnny A. Johannessen, Fabrice Collard, Craig Donlon, Gaute Hope, Pieter N. A. M. Visser, Marc Naeije
{"title":"Influence of Ocean Currents on Wave Modeling and Satellite Observations: Insights From the One Ocean Expedition","authors":"Ourania Altiparmaki,&nbsp;Øyvind Breivik,&nbsp;Lotfi Aouf,&nbsp;Patrik Bohlinger,&nbsp;Johnny A. Johannessen,&nbsp;Fabrice Collard,&nbsp;Craig Donlon,&nbsp;Gaute Hope,&nbsp;Pieter N. A. M. Visser,&nbsp;Marc Naeije","doi":"10.1029/2024JC021581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the influence of ocean currents on wave modeling and satellite observations using in situ wave measurements from the One Ocean Expedition 2021–2023. In January 2023, six OpenMetBuoy drifters were deployed in the Agulhas Current region. Their high immersion ratio minimized wind effects, allowing them to follow the current and return to the Indian Ocean by the Agulhas retroflection, collecting data for about 2 months. Comparing surface current velocities from both the Mercator model and Globcurrent product with drifter data reveals underestimation for velocities over <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>0.5</mn>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mi>m</mi>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <msup>\n <mi>s</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $0.5\\,\\mathrm{m}\\,{\\mathrm{s}}^{-\\mathrm{1}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> with Mercator showing greater variability. Significant wave height and Stokes drift parameters from MFWAM and ERA5 were also evaluated against drifters. Both models tend to overestimate Stokes drift more noticeable in ERA5, indicating sensitivity to wind seas. For significant wave height, both models agree well with drifter measurements with correlations of 0.90 for MFWAM and 0.83 for ERA5. However, ERA5's lack of surface current data combined with its coarse resolution (0.5<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>°</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${}^{\\circ}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) lead to underestimation of wave heights exceeding 2.5 m. MFWAM products including and excluding currents exhibit root mean square errors of 0.39 and 0.45 m, respectively, when compared to drifter measurements. This confirms that neglecting currents introduces additional errors particularly in areas with sharp current gradients. Analyzing MFWAM wave spectra, including and excluding currents, reveals wave energy transfer attributed to wave-current interactions. The spatial extent of these interactions is captured by satellite altimeters, revealing wave modulations with considerable wave height variations when waves cross eddies and the current core.</p>","PeriodicalId":54340,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans","volume":"129 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JC021581","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JC021581","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of ocean currents on wave modeling and satellite observations using in situ wave measurements from the One Ocean Expedition 2021–2023. In January 2023, six OpenMetBuoy drifters were deployed in the Agulhas Current region. Their high immersion ratio minimized wind effects, allowing them to follow the current and return to the Indian Ocean by the Agulhas retroflection, collecting data for about 2 months. Comparing surface current velocities from both the Mercator model and Globcurrent product with drifter data reveals underestimation for velocities over 0.5 m s 1 $0.5\,\mathrm{m}\,{\mathrm{s}}^{-\mathrm{1}}$ with Mercator showing greater variability. Significant wave height and Stokes drift parameters from MFWAM and ERA5 were also evaluated against drifters. Both models tend to overestimate Stokes drift more noticeable in ERA5, indicating sensitivity to wind seas. For significant wave height, both models agree well with drifter measurements with correlations of 0.90 for MFWAM and 0.83 for ERA5. However, ERA5's lack of surface current data combined with its coarse resolution (0.5 ° ${}^{\circ}$ ) lead to underestimation of wave heights exceeding 2.5 m. MFWAM products including and excluding currents exhibit root mean square errors of 0.39 and 0.45 m, respectively, when compared to drifter measurements. This confirms that neglecting currents introduces additional errors particularly in areas with sharp current gradients. Analyzing MFWAM wave spectra, including and excluding currents, reveals wave energy transfer attributed to wave-current interactions. The spatial extent of these interactions is captured by satellite altimeters, revealing wave modulations with considerable wave height variations when waves cross eddies and the current core.

Abstract Image

洋流对波浪建模和卫星观测的影响:一个海洋探险队的启示
本研究利用 2021-2023 年 "大洋一号 "考察队的现场波浪测量数据,研究洋流对波浪建模和卫星观测的影响。2023 年 1 月,在阿古哈斯洋流区域部署了六个 OpenMetBuoy 浮标。它们的高浸入比最大限度地减少了风的影响,使其能够跟随洋流并通过阿古哈斯倒转返回印度洋,收集了约 2 个月的数据。将墨卡托模式和 Globcurrent 产品的表层流速与漂流器数据进行比较,发现对 0.5 m s - 1 $0.5\,\mathrm{m}\,{\mathrm{s}^{-\mathrm{1}}$ 以上的流速估计不足,墨卡托模式的变化更大。还根据漂流器对 MFWAM 和 ERA5 的显著波高和斯托克斯漂流参数进行了评估。两个模式都倾向于高估斯托克斯漂移,ERA5 模式更为明显,这表明模式对风海的敏感性。就显波高度而言,两个模式与漂流器测量结果的相关性都很好,MFWAM 为 0.90,ERA5 为 0.83。然而,ERA5 缺乏表层海流数据,加之分辨率较低(0.5 ° ${}^{\circ}$ ),导致对超过 2.5 米的波高估计不足。这证明,忽略海流会带来额外的误差,尤其是在海流梯度较大的地区。分析包括和不包括海流在内的 MFWAM 波谱,可以发现波流相互作用引起的波能转移。卫星测高仪捕捉到了这些相互作用的空间范围,揭示了波浪穿过漩涡和海流核心时波浪高度变化相当大的波浪调制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans
Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans Earth and Planetary Sciences-Oceanography
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
429
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信