The Impact of Temperature on the Adiabaticity and Coverage of a Single Shallow Cumulus Cloud

IF 3.8 2区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Kang-En Huang, Minghuai Wang, Daniel Rosenfeld, Yannian Zhu, Xiaoran Ouyang
{"title":"The Impact of Temperature on the Adiabaticity and Coverage of a Single Shallow Cumulus Cloud","authors":"Kang-En Huang,&nbsp;Minghuai Wang,&nbsp;Daniel Rosenfeld,&nbsp;Yannian Zhu,&nbsp;Xiaoran Ouyang","doi":"10.1029/2024JD041585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The uncertainty of climate projection is significantly related to warm cloud feedback, which involves a complex interplay of various mechanisms. However, it is hard to unentangle temperature's impact on a single cloud with experiments, since the cloud dynamics always covary with environmental thermodynamical conditions. In this study, we investigate a simulated single shallow cumulus cloud's response to temperature using two perturbation methods, namely “uniform” and “buoyancy-fixed”, the latter of which keeps the buoyancy profile unchanged in temperature perturbation. High-resolution large eddy simulations show that uniform warming significantly increases cloud buoyancy, reducing cloud adiabaticity. If buoyancy is fixed, warming only reduces cloud area, leaving adiabatic fraction almost unchanged. Such a response can be explained by the Clausius-Clapeyron effect with an idealized 1D diffusion model, showing that warming increases the cloud-environment absolute humidity difference more than the increase in cloud liquid water content, resulting in a faster loss in both cloud coverage and total liquid water solely by lateral mixing. The responses of cloud coverage and total liquid water counteract, making adiabatic fraction insensitive to temperature change. Our work shows that the cloud adiabatic fraction's response to temperature is sensitive to the perturbed structure of the boundary layer, and the cloud coverage reduction by diffusion acts as a positive cloud feedback mechanism in addition to the adjustment processes of the boundary layer.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":"129 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD041585","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The uncertainty of climate projection is significantly related to warm cloud feedback, which involves a complex interplay of various mechanisms. However, it is hard to unentangle temperature's impact on a single cloud with experiments, since the cloud dynamics always covary with environmental thermodynamical conditions. In this study, we investigate a simulated single shallow cumulus cloud's response to temperature using two perturbation methods, namely “uniform” and “buoyancy-fixed”, the latter of which keeps the buoyancy profile unchanged in temperature perturbation. High-resolution large eddy simulations show that uniform warming significantly increases cloud buoyancy, reducing cloud adiabaticity. If buoyancy is fixed, warming only reduces cloud area, leaving adiabatic fraction almost unchanged. Such a response can be explained by the Clausius-Clapeyron effect with an idealized 1D diffusion model, showing that warming increases the cloud-environment absolute humidity difference more than the increase in cloud liquid water content, resulting in a faster loss in both cloud coverage and total liquid water solely by lateral mixing. The responses of cloud coverage and total liquid water counteract, making adiabatic fraction insensitive to temperature change. Our work shows that the cloud adiabatic fraction's response to temperature is sensitive to the perturbed structure of the boundary layer, and the cloud coverage reduction by diffusion acts as a positive cloud feedback mechanism in addition to the adjustment processes of the boundary layer.

温度对单层浅积云绝热性和覆盖范围的影响
气候预测的不确定性与暖云反馈有很大关系,其中涉及各种机制的复杂相互作用。然而,由于云的动力学总是与环境热力学条件共同作用,因此很难通过实验来厘清温度对单一云的影响。在本研究中,我们使用两种扰动方法(即 "均匀 "和 "浮力固定",后者在温度扰动中保持浮力剖面不变)研究了模拟单个浅积云对温度的响应。高分辨率大涡模拟显示,均匀升温会显著增加云的浮力,降低云的绝热性。如果浮力固定不变,变暖只会减少云的面积,使绝热部分几乎保持不变。这种响应可以用理想化的一维扩散模型中的克劳修斯-克拉皮隆效应来解释,表明气候变暖增加的云-环境绝对湿度差比增加的云液态水含量更大,从而导致云覆盖率和总液态水仅通过横向混合而更快地减少。云覆盖率和总液态水的反应相互抵消,使得绝热分数对温度变化不敏感。我们的研究表明,云的绝热分数对温度的响应对边界层的扰动结构很敏感,除了边界层的调整过程外,扩散导致的云覆盖率降低也是一种正的云反馈机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
684
期刊介绍: JGR: Atmospheres publishes articles that advance and improve understanding of atmospheric properties and processes, including the interaction of the atmosphere with other components of the Earth system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信