Capacity Limitations and Work Ability in Patients With Neurological Conditions With and Without Work Phobic Anxiety

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anne Henning, Beate Muschalla
{"title":"Capacity Limitations and Work Ability in Patients With Neurological Conditions With and Without Work Phobic Anxiety","authors":"Anne Henning,&nbsp;Beate Muschalla","doi":"10.1155/2024/6674418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Objective:</b> Work phobic anxiety can occur as an additional problem in any somatic illness and is often associated with work capacity limitations and sick leave. This study investigates work-related capacity limitations in patients with and without work phobic anxiety who are undergoing neurological rehabilitation. It was conducted in the rehabilitation facility Brandenburgklinik Berlin-Brandenburg in Germany.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Work phobic anxiety was assessed with the Workplace Phobia Scale (WPS). The response rate was 69.51%. Capacity limitations (Mini-ICF-APP) were compared between 19 patients with neurological conditions and work phobic anxiety and 209 patients with neurological conditions without work phobic anxiety. Work participation restrictions were examined and compared using the self- and observer rated Index for Measuring Participation (IMET, IMEP-O). The work ability assessments regarding the patients’ last occupation as well as the general labor market were conducted by the treating physicians as part of their medical reports and compared between the subgroups. The work ability was rated as less than 3 h, 3 to less than 6 h, or 6 h or more a day for more than 6 months, with the latter being an indication for prognostic work ability and potential reintegration into the labor market. This is a common classification in sociomedical assessments in Germany.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Independent <i>t</i>-tests showed that patients with work phobic anxiety were significantly more limited in their planning and structuring of tasks (<i>t</i>[20.104] = 2.310, <i>p</i> = 0.032, <i>d</i> = 0.68), flexibility (<i>t</i>[217] = 3.586, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.86), assertiveness (<i>t</i>[19.613] = 2.151, <i>p</i> = 0.044, <i>d</i> = 0.70), group integration (<i>t</i>[19.534] = 2.274, <i>p</i> = 0.034, <i>d</i> = 0.76), and mobility capacities (<i>t</i>[16.616] = 2.198, <i>p</i> = 0.042, <i>d</i> = 0.76) and significantly more restricted in participating in work compared to patients without work phobic anxiety (IMEP-O: <i>t</i>[23.549] = 2.298, <i>p</i> = 0.031, <i>d</i> = 0.40; IMET: <i>t</i>[27.191] = 4.581, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.78). Chi-squared tests revealed no significant differences in the physicians’ work ability assessments between patients with and without work phobic anxiety.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> While work phobic anxiety seems to not be decisive concerning early retirement assessments, it is associated with greater capacity limitations and work participation restrictions. The results highlight the need for identifying work phobic anxiety and associated capacity limitations in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":6939,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/6674418","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/6674418","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Work phobic anxiety can occur as an additional problem in any somatic illness and is often associated with work capacity limitations and sick leave. This study investigates work-related capacity limitations in patients with and without work phobic anxiety who are undergoing neurological rehabilitation. It was conducted in the rehabilitation facility Brandenburgklinik Berlin-Brandenburg in Germany.

Methods: Work phobic anxiety was assessed with the Workplace Phobia Scale (WPS). The response rate was 69.51%. Capacity limitations (Mini-ICF-APP) were compared between 19 patients with neurological conditions and work phobic anxiety and 209 patients with neurological conditions without work phobic anxiety. Work participation restrictions were examined and compared using the self- and observer rated Index for Measuring Participation (IMET, IMEP-O). The work ability assessments regarding the patients’ last occupation as well as the general labor market were conducted by the treating physicians as part of their medical reports and compared between the subgroups. The work ability was rated as less than 3 h, 3 to less than 6 h, or 6 h or more a day for more than 6 months, with the latter being an indication for prognostic work ability and potential reintegration into the labor market. This is a common classification in sociomedical assessments in Germany.

Results: Independent t-tests showed that patients with work phobic anxiety were significantly more limited in their planning and structuring of tasks (t[20.104] = 2.310, p = 0.032, d = 0.68), flexibility (t[217] = 3.586, p < 0.001, d = 0.86), assertiveness (t[19.613] = 2.151, p = 0.044, d = 0.70), group integration (t[19.534] = 2.274, p = 0.034, d = 0.76), and mobility capacities (t[16.616] = 2.198, p = 0.042, d = 0.76) and significantly more restricted in participating in work compared to patients without work phobic anxiety (IMEP-O: t[23.549] = 2.298, p = 0.031, d = 0.40; IMET: t[27.191] = 4.581, p < 0.001, d = 0.78). Chi-squared tests revealed no significant differences in the physicians’ work ability assessments between patients with and without work phobic anxiety.

Conclusions: While work phobic anxiety seems to not be decisive concerning early retirement assessments, it is associated with greater capacity limitations and work participation restrictions. The results highlight the need for identifying work phobic anxiety and associated capacity limitations in clinical practice.

有和没有工作恐惧症焦虑症的神经系统疾病患者的能力限制和工作能力
目的:工作恐惧焦虑可作为任何躯体疾病的额外问题出现,通常与工作能力限制和病假有关。本研究调查了患有和未患有工作恐惧症焦虑症的神经康复患者的工作能力限制。研究在德国柏林勃兰登堡康复中心进行:方法:采用工作场所恐惧症量表(WPS)评估工作恐惧症焦虑。应答率为 69.51%。对 19 名患有神经系统疾病并伴有工作恐惧症焦虑症的患者和 209 名患有神经系统疾病但不伴有工作恐惧症焦虑症的患者的能力限制(Mini-ICF-APP)进行了比较。使用自我和观察者评分的参与指数(IMET、IMEP-O)对工作参与限制进行了检查和比较。作为医疗报告的一部分,主治医生对患者最后从事的职业以及一般劳动力市场进行了工作能力评估,并在分组之间进行了比较。工作能力被评为少于 3 小时、3 至少于 6 小时或每天工作 6 小时或 6 个月以上,后者是预后工作能力和重返劳动力市场潜力的指标。这是德国社会医学评估中常用的分类方法:独立 t 检验显示,工作恐惧症患者在计划和安排任务(t[20.104] = 2.310,p = 0.032,d = 0.68)、灵活性(t[217] = 3.586,p < 0.001,d = 0.86)、自信(t[19.613] = 2.151,p = 0.044,d = 0.70)、团体融合(t[19.534] = 2.274,p = 0.034,d = 0.76)、行动能力(t[16.616] = 2.198,p = 0.042,d = 0.IMEP-O:t[23.549] = 2.298,p = 0.031,d = 0.40;IMET:t[27.191] = 4.581,p <0.001,d = 0.78)。卡方检验显示,有工作恐惧症焦虑症和没有工作恐惧症焦虑症的患者在医生的工作能力评估中没有明显差异:结论:虽然工作恐惧焦虑似乎并不是提前退休评估的决定性因素,但它与更大的能力限制和工作参与限制有关。研究结果凸显了在临床实践中识别工作恐惧症焦虑症和相关能力限制的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
161
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Neurologica Scandinavica aims to publish manuscripts of a high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work in neuroscience. The journal''s scope is to act as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science or practice of this subject area. Papers in English will be welcomed, especially those which bring new knowledge and observations from the application of therapies or techniques in the combating of a broad spectrum of neurological disease and neurodegenerative disorders. Relevant articles on the basic neurosciences will be published where they extend present understanding of such disorders. Priority will be given to review of topical subjects. Papers requiring rapid publication because of their significance and timeliness will be included as ''Clinical commentaries'' not exceeding two printed pages, as will ''Clinical commentaries'' of sufficient general interest. Debate within the speciality is encouraged in the form of ''Letters to the editor''. All submitted manuscripts falling within the overall scope of the journal will be assessed by suitably qualified referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信