Two plant extracts protect stored maize against infestation of Sitophilus zeamais in Northern Ghana

Abraham Akuoli Issaka Ndebugri , Joseph Xorxe Kugbe , Samuel Adu-Acheampong , Rosina Kyerematen
{"title":"Two plant extracts protect stored maize against infestation of Sitophilus zeamais in Northern Ghana","authors":"Abraham Akuoli Issaka Ndebugri ,&nbsp;Joseph Xorxe Kugbe ,&nbsp;Samuel Adu-Acheampong ,&nbsp;Rosina Kyerematen","doi":"10.1016/j.napere.2024.100102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Botanicals have been encouraged as substitutes for conventional pesticides to reduce the impact of the latter on the environment. In line with that, we studied the effects of two plant extracts in controlling <em>Sitophilus zeamais</em> Motsch (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) attacks on stored maize (<em>Zea mays</em> L. Poales: Poaceae). The experiment was conducted under a normal room temperature of 27⁰C to 30⁰C and relative humidity of 74–76 % in a completely randomized experimental design. We infested the stored maize seeds in glass jars with <em>S. zeamais</em> F<sub>1</sub> under a 12-hour day and 12-hour night within 24 hours period. This was after 50 g of the seeds were mixed with 2 g each of the two botanicals separately in different glass jars. There were 5 treatments and 10 replications in total. The data taken for this study were quantitative. To ascertain the efficacy of the botanicals we compared the number of dead and live weevils, of seeds damage and weight loss caused by weevil attacks under each of the different treatments by determining percentage mortality, percent weight loss, seed damage and progeny production. Our results showed that the different botanical formulations significantly controlled <em>S. zeamais</em> population resulting in reduced damage, better protection and improved storage of maize seeds. However, there were no significant differences in protections offered between shade dried neem seed powder and rice husk powder although the latter was the most efficacious with 85 % mortality compared to the former with 65 % with sundried neem seed powder being the least with a little above 40 % mortality. We concluded from this study that the formulated botanicals were very effective in controlling <em>S. zeamais</em> populations and therefore recommended that it be used as a cost effective and environmentally friendly protection of stored maize against <em>S. zeamais</em> attacks, especially in rural poor areas and places known for continuous seed production and storage, such as the case of the study community.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Pesticide Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Pesticide Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773078624000372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Botanicals have been encouraged as substitutes for conventional pesticides to reduce the impact of the latter on the environment. In line with that, we studied the effects of two plant extracts in controlling Sitophilus zeamais Motsch (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) attacks on stored maize (Zea mays L. Poales: Poaceae). The experiment was conducted under a normal room temperature of 27⁰C to 30⁰C and relative humidity of 74–76 % in a completely randomized experimental design. We infested the stored maize seeds in glass jars with S. zeamais F1 under a 12-hour day and 12-hour night within 24 hours period. This was after 50 g of the seeds were mixed with 2 g each of the two botanicals separately in different glass jars. There were 5 treatments and 10 replications in total. The data taken for this study were quantitative. To ascertain the efficacy of the botanicals we compared the number of dead and live weevils, of seeds damage and weight loss caused by weevil attacks under each of the different treatments by determining percentage mortality, percent weight loss, seed damage and progeny production. Our results showed that the different botanical formulations significantly controlled S. zeamais population resulting in reduced damage, better protection and improved storage of maize seeds. However, there were no significant differences in protections offered between shade dried neem seed powder and rice husk powder although the latter was the most efficacious with 85 % mortality compared to the former with 65 % with sundried neem seed powder being the least with a little above 40 % mortality. We concluded from this study that the formulated botanicals were very effective in controlling S. zeamais populations and therefore recommended that it be used as a cost effective and environmentally friendly protection of stored maize against S. zeamais attacks, especially in rural poor areas and places known for continuous seed production and storage, such as the case of the study community.
两种植物提取物可保护加纳北部储存的玉米免受嗜坐螨的侵扰
人们鼓励用植物药替代传统杀虫剂,以减少后者对环境的影响。有鉴于此,我们研究了两种植物提取物在控制贮藏玉米(Zea mays L. Poales: Poaceae)上的嗜线虫(Sitophilus zeamais Motsch)(鞘翅目:虫科)侵袭方面的效果。实验在正常室温 27⁰C 至 30⁰C 和相对湿度 74-76 % 的条件下进行,采用完全随机实验设计。我们在 24 小时内昼夜各 12 小时的条件下,用玉米螟 S. zeamais F1 侵染玻璃瓶中储存的玉米种子。将 50 克种子分别与两种植物药各 2 克混合后装入不同的玻璃瓶中。总共有 5 个处理和 10 次重复。本研究采用定量数据。为了确定植物药的功效,我们通过测定死亡率百分比、重量损失百分比、种子损坏率和后代产量,比较了不同处理下草履虫的死活数量、种子损坏率和草履虫攻击造成的重量损失。我们的研究结果表明,不同的植物配方能显著控制玉米象鼻虫的数量,从而减少损害,更好地保护玉米种子,并改善玉米种子的储藏。不过,阴干楝种子粉和稻壳粉的保护效果并无明显差异,但后者的死亡率为 85%,前者的死亡率为 65%,后者的死亡率为 65%,而阴干楝种子粉的死亡率最低,略高于 40%。我们从这项研究中得出结论,配制的植物药对控制褐飞虱种群非常有效,因此建议将其作为一种具有成本效益且环保的方法,用于保护储存的玉米免受褐飞虱的侵袭,尤其是在农村贫困地区和以连续生产和储存种子而闻名的地方,如研究社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信