Yaomin Gao , Gelong Xu , Jiwei Cai , Qing Tian , Ruixue Liu , Jiaqi Zhang , Zixuan Du
{"title":"Comparison of waste glass and fly ash as silica sources for autoclaved materials","authors":"Yaomin Gao , Gelong Xu , Jiwei Cai , Qing Tian , Ruixue Liu , Jiaqi Zhang , Zixuan Du","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The effect of fly ash (FA) and glass powder (GP) as siliceous materials on the strength, hydration products and microstructure of autoclaved materials are investigated. The results indicated that GP is more beneficial to the growth of compressive strength than FA. At the Ca/Si ratio of 0.7, the compressive strength of the GP mixture is 95.7 % higher than that of the FA mixture, and the compressive strength presents a monotonously increasing trend with the increase of the GP replacement ratio for FA. The silica in GP has a higher reactivity than FA to form more hydration products. The main hydration product in the GP mixture is mainly the amorphous C-S-H with a lower Ca/Si ratio, which is difficult to crystalize and transform into tobermorite. FA facilitates the formation of tobermorite, and with the substitution of GP for FA, the fibrous tobermorite is displaced by sheet-like tobermorite and even the foil-like phases at a high GP substitution ratio. Furthermore, the hydration products in the GP mixture have a lower density than that in the FA mixture, but it is conducive to reducing the porosity of the autoclaved material. The low porosity is an important reason that GP as siliceous raw material is eligible for preparing high-strength autoclaved material.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"455 ","pages":"Article 139154"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095006182404296X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The effect of fly ash (FA) and glass powder (GP) as siliceous materials on the strength, hydration products and microstructure of autoclaved materials are investigated. The results indicated that GP is more beneficial to the growth of compressive strength than FA. At the Ca/Si ratio of 0.7, the compressive strength of the GP mixture is 95.7 % higher than that of the FA mixture, and the compressive strength presents a monotonously increasing trend with the increase of the GP replacement ratio for FA. The silica in GP has a higher reactivity than FA to form more hydration products. The main hydration product in the GP mixture is mainly the amorphous C-S-H with a lower Ca/Si ratio, which is difficult to crystalize and transform into tobermorite. FA facilitates the formation of tobermorite, and with the substitution of GP for FA, the fibrous tobermorite is displaced by sheet-like tobermorite and even the foil-like phases at a high GP substitution ratio. Furthermore, the hydration products in the GP mixture have a lower density than that in the FA mixture, but it is conducive to reducing the porosity of the autoclaved material. The low porosity is an important reason that GP as siliceous raw material is eligible for preparing high-strength autoclaved material.
研究了粉煤灰(FA)和玻璃粉(GP)作为硅质材料对蒸压材料强度、水化产物和微观结构的影响。结果表明,GP 比 FA 更有利于抗压强度的增长。在 Ca/Si 比为 0.7 时,GP 混合物的抗压强度比 FA 混合物高 95.7%,并且抗压强度随着 GP 替代 FA 比例的增加呈单调上升趋势。GP 中的二氧化硅比 FA 具有更高的反应活性,能形成更多的水化产物。GP 混合物中的主要水化产物主要是 Ca/Si 比值较低的无定形 C-S-H,它很难结晶并转化成托勃莫来石。FA 有利于托勃莫来石的形成,随着 GP 取代 FA,纤维状托勃莫来石被片状托勃莫来石取代,甚至在 GP 取代率较高时,箔状相也会被取代。此外,GP 混合物中的水合产物密度低于 FA 混合物,但有利于降低蒸压材料的孔隙率。低孔隙率是 GP 作为硅质原料可用于制备高强度蒸压材料的重要原因。
期刊介绍:
Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged.
Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.