Has population mental health returned to pre-pandemic levels, among and between racialized groups and by immigration status?

IF 4.1 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Caitlin Patler, Paola D. Langer
{"title":"Has population mental health returned to pre-pandemic levels, among and between racialized groups and by immigration status?","authors":"Caitlin Patler,&nbsp;Paola D. Langer","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly impacted population health, including mental health, in ways that were patterned unevenly by pre-existing systemic inequalities such as structural gendered racism and xenophobia. However, it remains unclear whether pandemic-related mental health deterioration has persisted over time. Drawing on theories of disruptive events and structural racism, we conceptualize the pandemic as a <em>prolonged macro-level disruptive event</em> with unequal ramifications for different racialized groups and by immigration status. We use six waves (2017–2022) of repeated cross-sectional data from the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS; N = 121,063) from men and women from nine racialized and immigration status groups (US-born citizens, naturalized citizens, and noncitizens of White, Latina/o, and Asian racialized groups, respectively). We use multivariable regression to examine changes in psychological distress within each group, and then assess patterns of racialized health disparities between Latina/o and Asian groups, respectively, compared to White US-born citizens, who occupy the most structurally privileged social status. Our analyses reveal several key findings. First, we observed persistent increases in psychological distress from 2020 through 2022, relative to the pre-pandemic period (2017–2019), for all racialized and immigration status groups, among men and women. Second, few groups had returned to pre-pandemic distress levels as of 2022. Third, there was a consistent health advantage for White US-born citizens across the pre-pandemic and pandemic years, whose highest post-pandemic distress measure was lower or equivalent to the pre-pandemic distress of US-born Latina/o and Asian groups. Fourth, the psychological distress gap between the White US-born population and US-born Latina/o and Asian groups, respectively, grew or held steady through 2022. Finally, the 2020–2022 period was associated with a reduction in pre-pandemic health advantages among Asian immigrant groups, relative to US-born White citizens, especially among men. Our findings provide strong evidence that population mental health has not recovered from the pandemic period.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74861,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Mental health","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100362"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560324000677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly impacted population health, including mental health, in ways that were patterned unevenly by pre-existing systemic inequalities such as structural gendered racism and xenophobia. However, it remains unclear whether pandemic-related mental health deterioration has persisted over time. Drawing on theories of disruptive events and structural racism, we conceptualize the pandemic as a prolonged macro-level disruptive event with unequal ramifications for different racialized groups and by immigration status. We use six waves (2017–2022) of repeated cross-sectional data from the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS; N = 121,063) from men and women from nine racialized and immigration status groups (US-born citizens, naturalized citizens, and noncitizens of White, Latina/o, and Asian racialized groups, respectively). We use multivariable regression to examine changes in psychological distress within each group, and then assess patterns of racialized health disparities between Latina/o and Asian groups, respectively, compared to White US-born citizens, who occupy the most structurally privileged social status. Our analyses reveal several key findings. First, we observed persistent increases in psychological distress from 2020 through 2022, relative to the pre-pandemic period (2017–2019), for all racialized and immigration status groups, among men and women. Second, few groups had returned to pre-pandemic distress levels as of 2022. Third, there was a consistent health advantage for White US-born citizens across the pre-pandemic and pandemic years, whose highest post-pandemic distress measure was lower or equivalent to the pre-pandemic distress of US-born Latina/o and Asian groups. Fourth, the psychological distress gap between the White US-born population and US-born Latina/o and Asian groups, respectively, grew or held steady through 2022. Finally, the 2020–2022 period was associated with a reduction in pre-pandemic health advantages among Asian immigrant groups, relative to US-born White citizens, especially among men. Our findings provide strong evidence that population mental health has not recovered from the pandemic period.
在不同种族群体之间以及不同移民身份的群体之间,人口心理健康是否已恢复到大流行前的水平?
COVID-19 大流行对包括心理健康在内的人口健康产生了深远的影响,这种影响的方式与之前存在的系统性不平等(如结构性性别种族主义和仇外心理)形成了不均衡的模式。然而,与大流行相关的心理健康恶化是否会随着时间的推移而持续,目前仍不清楚。借鉴破坏性事件和结构性种族主义理论,我们将大流行病概念化为一个长期的宏观破坏性事件,对不同种族群体和移民身份造成了不平等的影响。我们使用了来自加州健康访谈调查(CHIS;N = 121,063 )的六波(2017-2022 年)重复横截面数据,这些数据来自九个种族化群体和移民身份群体(分别为美国出生的公民、归化公民以及白人、拉丁/裔和亚裔种族化群体的非公民)的男性和女性。我们使用多元回归法来研究每个群体中心理困扰的变化,然后分别评估拉丁裔和亚裔群体与美国出生的白人公民之间的种族化健康差异模式,因为美国出生的白人公民在结构上享有最优越的社会地位。我们的分析揭示了几个重要发现。首先,我们观察到,与疫情流行前(2017-2019 年)相比,所有种族和移民身份群体的男性和女性在 2020 年至 2022 年期间的心理压力持续增加。其次,截至 2022 年,很少有群体恢复到大流行前的心理困扰水平。第三,在大流行前和大流行期间,在美国出生的白人公民在健康方面始终保持优势,他们在大流行后的最高痛苦指数低于或相当于在美国出生的拉丁/裔和亚裔群体在大流行前的痛苦指数。第四,美国出生的白人群体与美国出生的拉丁裔/有色人种群体和亚裔群体之间的心理困扰差距在 2022 年之前分别有所扩大或保持稳定。最后,2020-2022 年期间,相对于美国出生的白人公民,亚裔移民群体在大流行前的健康优势有所下降,尤其是男性。我们的研究结果有力地证明,人口的心理健康尚未从大流行时期恢复过来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SSM. Mental health
SSM. Mental health Social Psychology, Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
118 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信