Life cycle assessment of bananas, melons, and watermelons from Costa Rica

Nydia Suppen-Reynaga , Ana Belén Guerrero , Elena Rosa Dominguez , Edgar Sacayón , Andrea Solano
{"title":"Life cycle assessment of bananas, melons, and watermelons from Costa Rica","authors":"Nydia Suppen-Reynaga ,&nbsp;Ana Belén Guerrero ,&nbsp;Elena Rosa Dominguez ,&nbsp;Edgar Sacayón ,&nbsp;Andrea Solano","doi":"10.1016/j.clcb.2024.100120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Banana and watermelon are the two most important fruit crops in the world, and Costa Rica is one of the leading producers worldwide. Even though the importance of banana, melon, and watermelon crops, few life cycle assessments have been done and published. This study aims to provide information on the environmental performance of the banana, melon, and watermelon sectors in Costa Rica to determine the most significant parameters in the life cycle of these fruits. The supply chain of the fruit crops was analyzed as follows: farm production, post-harvest treatment and packaging, distribution and retail, household consumption, and end of life. It means that the study was developed with a cradle-to-grave approach. The functional unit was 1 kg of fresh fruit delivered in a country of the European Union. Mainly, primary data were used from farms with a conventional farming system. The fruit production process was modeled in SimaPro 9.0. ReCiPe midpoint (H) was used for the impact assessment, where 11 impact categories were evaluated, including the categories required in the product category rules for fruits and nuts. In all three fruit crops studied, the most impact stages are farm production, distribution and retail (international transport), and the end-of-life stage. In this study, waste management is relatively high due to the high amount of the non-edible part of the fruit (38.6 % for bananas and 42 % for melon and watermelon). It has a significant influence on the toxicity impact categories. The carbon footprint for the banana supply chain was estimated at 0.805 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/kg of bananas produced in Costa Rica and consumed in Europe, and for melon and watermelon was 0.822 kg of CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/kg. Since there are no life cycle assessments of banana fruit with a cradle-to-grave approach, and only studies focused on carbon footprint or with a cradle-to-gate approach are available, more studies and collection of information in situ are necessary.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100250,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772801324000484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Banana and watermelon are the two most important fruit crops in the world, and Costa Rica is one of the leading producers worldwide. Even though the importance of banana, melon, and watermelon crops, few life cycle assessments have been done and published. This study aims to provide information on the environmental performance of the banana, melon, and watermelon sectors in Costa Rica to determine the most significant parameters in the life cycle of these fruits. The supply chain of the fruit crops was analyzed as follows: farm production, post-harvest treatment and packaging, distribution and retail, household consumption, and end of life. It means that the study was developed with a cradle-to-grave approach. The functional unit was 1 kg of fresh fruit delivered in a country of the European Union. Mainly, primary data were used from farms with a conventional farming system. The fruit production process was modeled in SimaPro 9.0. ReCiPe midpoint (H) was used for the impact assessment, where 11 impact categories were evaluated, including the categories required in the product category rules for fruits and nuts. In all three fruit crops studied, the most impact stages are farm production, distribution and retail (international transport), and the end-of-life stage. In this study, waste management is relatively high due to the high amount of the non-edible part of the fruit (38.6 % for bananas and 42 % for melon and watermelon). It has a significant influence on the toxicity impact categories. The carbon footprint for the banana supply chain was estimated at 0.805 kg CO2-eq/kg of bananas produced in Costa Rica and consumed in Europe, and for melon and watermelon was 0.822 kg of CO2-eq/kg. Since there are no life cycle assessments of banana fruit with a cradle-to-grave approach, and only studies focused on carbon footprint or with a cradle-to-gate approach are available, more studies and collection of information in situ are necessary.
哥斯达黎加香蕉、甜瓜和西瓜的生命周期评估
香蕉和西瓜是世界上最重要的两种水果作物,哥斯达黎加是世界上主要的生产国之一。尽管香蕉、甜瓜和西瓜作物非常重要,但很少有人做过生命周期评估,也很少有人发表过评估结果。本研究旨在提供哥斯达黎加香蕉、甜瓜和西瓜行业的环境绩效信息,以确定这些水果生命周期中最重要的参数。对水果作物供应链的分析如下:农场生产、收获后处理和包装、分销和零售、家庭消费和生命终结。这意味着研究采用了 "从摇篮到坟墓 "的方法。功能单位是欧盟国家配送的 1 公斤新鲜水果。主要使用了传统农业系统农场的原始数据。水果生产过程在 SimaPro 9.0 中建模。使用 ReCiPe 中点(H)进行影响评估,评估了 11 个影响类别,包括水果和坚果产品类别规则中要求的类别。在所研究的三种水果作物中,影响最大的阶段是农场生产、分销和零售(国际运输)以及生命终结阶段。在这项研究中,由于水果的非食用部分较多(香蕉为 38.6%,甜瓜和西瓜为 42%),因此废物管理的影响相对较大。这对毒性影响类别有重大影响。据估计,香蕉供应链的碳足迹为 0.805 千克二氧化碳当量/千克,香蕉产自哥斯达黎加,在欧洲消费,甜瓜和西瓜的碳足迹为 0.822 千克二氧化碳当量/千克。由于目前还没有采用 "从摇篮到坟墓 "的方法对香蕉果实进行生命周期评估,只有侧重于碳足迹或采用 "从摇篮到入口 "方法的研究,因此有必要进行更多的研究和实地信息收集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信