How do trade-offs between ecological construction and urbanization affect regional carbon balance? A case study from China’s Yellow River Basin

IF 5.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Wenle Yang, Jinghu Pan
{"title":"How do trade-offs between ecological construction and urbanization affect regional carbon balance? A case study from China’s Yellow River Basin","authors":"Wenle Yang,&nbsp;Jinghu Pan","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2024.108534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anthropogenic activities, including trade-offs between ecological construction and urbanization, alter land use by either adding or subtracting from the carbon balance. Therefore, it is unknown how the trade-offs between ecological construction and urbanization impact the regional carbon balance. We selected the Yellow River Basin for this study to shed light on how human activity affects the carbon balance and promote the advancement of the objective of becoming carbon–neutral. Using panel data, soil respiration data, and GEM-CO<sub>2</sub> models, carbon emissions and sinks in multiple fields were quantified on a raster scale based on multi-source remote sensing data. The trade-offs between urbanization and ecological construction were then spatially illustrated through changes in ground cover. Finally, a raster-scale study was conducted to investigate the ways in which trade-offs between urbanization and ecological construction impact the regional carbon balance. The basin was able to maintain a carbon balance in 2001; however, by 2019, it experienced a severe carbon imbalance. The primary causes of this were rapid growth in energy consumption and direct household waste incineration. By 2019, 84.79% of rasters had a trade-off connection, indicating an increasing trend in the degree of trade-off between ecological construction and urbanization. This affected the pattern of land use in the basin, which in turn affected the carbon balance. Rapid urbanization has exacerbated the carbon imbalance, but ecological construction can reverse this trend. The carbon balance was negatively correlated with the trade-off between ecological construction and urbanization, and the conversion of natural resources by human activity hastened the spread of regional carbon imbalances.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 108534"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816224007318","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anthropogenic activities, including trade-offs between ecological construction and urbanization, alter land use by either adding or subtracting from the carbon balance. Therefore, it is unknown how the trade-offs between ecological construction and urbanization impact the regional carbon balance. We selected the Yellow River Basin for this study to shed light on how human activity affects the carbon balance and promote the advancement of the objective of becoming carbon–neutral. Using panel data, soil respiration data, and GEM-CO2 models, carbon emissions and sinks in multiple fields were quantified on a raster scale based on multi-source remote sensing data. The trade-offs between urbanization and ecological construction were then spatially illustrated through changes in ground cover. Finally, a raster-scale study was conducted to investigate the ways in which trade-offs between urbanization and ecological construction impact the regional carbon balance. The basin was able to maintain a carbon balance in 2001; however, by 2019, it experienced a severe carbon imbalance. The primary causes of this were rapid growth in energy consumption and direct household waste incineration. By 2019, 84.79% of rasters had a trade-off connection, indicating an increasing trend in the degree of trade-off between ecological construction and urbanization. This affected the pattern of land use in the basin, which in turn affected the carbon balance. Rapid urbanization has exacerbated the carbon imbalance, but ecological construction can reverse this trend. The carbon balance was negatively correlated with the trade-off between ecological construction and urbanization, and the conversion of natural resources by human activity hastened the spread of regional carbon imbalances.

Abstract Image

生态建设与城市化之间的权衡如何影响区域碳平衡?中国黄河流域案例研究
人为活动,包括生态建设与城市化之间的权衡,通过增加或减少碳平衡来改变土地利用。因此,生态建设与城市化之间的权衡如何影响区域碳平衡尚不得而知。我们选择黄河流域作为研究对象,旨在揭示人类活动如何影响碳平衡,推动实现碳中和目标。利用面板数据、土壤呼吸数据和 GEM-CO2 模型,基于多源遥感数据,在栅格尺度上量化了多个领域的碳排放量和碳汇。然后,通过地面植被的变化,从空间上说明了城市化与生态建设之间的权衡。最后,进行了一项栅格尺度研究,探讨城市化与生态建设之间的权衡如何影响区域碳平衡。该流域在 2001 年还能保持碳平衡,但到 2019 年,却出现了严重的碳失衡。造成这种情况的主要原因是能源消耗和生活垃圾直接焚烧的快速增长。到 2019 年,84.79% 的栅格具有权衡联系,表明生态建设与城市化之间的权衡程度呈上升趋势。这影响了流域的土地利用模式,进而影响了碳平衡。快速城市化加剧了碳失衡,但生态建设可以扭转这一趋势。碳平衡与生态建设和城市化之间的权衡呈负相关,人类活动对自然资源的转化加速了区域碳失衡的蔓延。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信