{"title":"Intense light pulses in combination with lemongrass essential oil in vapor phase to inactivate Salmonella Typhimurium on sunflower and quinoa seeds","authors":"Fatima Reyes-Jurado , Diana Paulina Sucar-Escamilla , Margarita Etchegaray-Bello , Raul Ávila-Sosa , Aurelio López-Malo , Emma Mani-López , Enrique Palou","doi":"10.1016/j.foodcont.2024.111004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The response of <em>Salmonella</em> Typhimurium to combined treatment involving intense light pulses (ILP) and exposure to different concentrations of lemongrass (<em>Cymbopogon citratus</em>) essential oil (LEO) in vapor phase was assessed on sunflower and quinoa seeds. Microbiological analyses were performed by inoculating sunflower and quinoa seeds with <em>S.</em> Typhimurium (10<sup>6</sup> CFU/g) and counting microbial populations pre- and post-processing. Moisture content, peroxide value, color, and sensory evaluation were performed for the best ILP + LEO treatments in terms of log reductions of inoculated <em>Salmonella</em>. For ILP treatments, <em>S</em>. Typhimurium was significantly (p < 0.05) reduced on both inoculated seeds since 3.0 and 2.3 log-cycle reductions were achieved with 12 s treatment (16.20 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) on sunflower and quinoa, respectively. Subsequently, seeds with the surviving populations of <em>S</em>. Typhimurium were exposed to LEO vapor phase. They were inactivated by ∼3 log with a 360 μl LEO/L<sub>air</sub>. The Weibull model accurately described data from <em>S</em>. Typhimurium inactivation during ILP treatments (R<sup>2</sup> > 0.96, RSME <0.28). Seeds treated with 16.2 J/cm<sup>2</sup> ILP had similar physicochemical and sensory properties to untreated ones; however, ILP + LEO impacted the seeds’ odor. Combining ILP treatment and LEO in the vapor phase resulted in an innovative alternative to increase microbial inactivation in seeds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":319,"journal":{"name":"Food Control","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 111004"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Control","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956713524007217","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The response of Salmonella Typhimurium to combined treatment involving intense light pulses (ILP) and exposure to different concentrations of lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus) essential oil (LEO) in vapor phase was assessed on sunflower and quinoa seeds. Microbiological analyses were performed by inoculating sunflower and quinoa seeds with S. Typhimurium (106 CFU/g) and counting microbial populations pre- and post-processing. Moisture content, peroxide value, color, and sensory evaluation were performed for the best ILP + LEO treatments in terms of log reductions of inoculated Salmonella. For ILP treatments, S. Typhimurium was significantly (p < 0.05) reduced on both inoculated seeds since 3.0 and 2.3 log-cycle reductions were achieved with 12 s treatment (16.20 J/cm2) on sunflower and quinoa, respectively. Subsequently, seeds with the surviving populations of S. Typhimurium were exposed to LEO vapor phase. They were inactivated by ∼3 log with a 360 μl LEO/Lair. The Weibull model accurately described data from S. Typhimurium inactivation during ILP treatments (R2 > 0.96, RSME <0.28). Seeds treated with 16.2 J/cm2 ILP had similar physicochemical and sensory properties to untreated ones; however, ILP + LEO impacted the seeds’ odor. Combining ILP treatment and LEO in the vapor phase resulted in an innovative alternative to increase microbial inactivation in seeds.
期刊介绍:
Food Control is an international journal that provides essential information for those involved in food safety and process control.
Food Control covers the below areas that relate to food process control or to food safety of human foods:
• Microbial food safety and antimicrobial systems
• Mycotoxins
• Hazard analysis, HACCP and food safety objectives
• Risk assessment, including microbial and chemical hazards
• Quality assurance
• Good manufacturing practices
• Food process systems design and control
• Food Packaging technology and materials in contact with foods
• Rapid methods of analysis and detection, including sensor technology
• Codes of practice, legislation and international harmonization
• Consumer issues
• Education, training and research needs.
The scope of Food Control is comprehensive and includes original research papers, authoritative reviews, short communications, comment articles that report on new developments in food control, and position papers.