Can mild alkaline pretreatment simultaneously enhance the antioxidant capacity of Beta-carotene extracts and biomethane yields in a sustainable Dunaliella salina biorefinery?
Pilar Águila-Carricondo , Raquel García-García , Juan Pablo de la Roche , Pedro Luis Galán , Luis Fernando Bautista , Gemma Vicente
{"title":"Can mild alkaline pretreatment simultaneously enhance the antioxidant capacity of Beta-carotene extracts and biomethane yields in a sustainable Dunaliella salina biorefinery?","authors":"Pilar Águila-Carricondo , Raquel García-García , Juan Pablo de la Roche , Pedro Luis Galán , Luis Fernando Bautista , Gemma Vicente","doi":"10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research aims to assess the effect of alkaline pretreatments on the antioxidant potential of β-carotene-rich extracts from the microalga <em>Dunaliella salina</em> and the cumulative biomethane production from its spent biomass, within the framework of a circular economy approach using four biorefineries. A solvent screening was performed, with ethyl acetate achieving the maximum β-carotene extraction yield (5.3% ± 0.03%). Alkaline pretreatments were applied to the initial biomass (direct) and extracts after a extraction with ethyl acetate (indirect), using two matrices: water (W) and a mixture water:ethanol (WE). Direct alkaline pretreatments (D) offered extracts with higher potential than indirect pretreatments (I) in terms of: i) antioxidant capacity, as measured by ABTS<sup>•+</sup> assay (0.69±0.1 and 0.61±0.1 mmolTE/gDW for W-D and WE-D, respectively, and 0.55±0.1 and 0.53±0.1 mmolTE/gDW for W-I and WE-I, respectively) and •OH scavenging activity (1.89±0.2 and 2.05±0.5 mmolTE/gDW for W-D and WE-D, respectively, and 0.48±0 and 1.2±0.3 mmolTE/gDW for W-I and WE-I, respectively), ii) biomethane production from their spent biomass (301±14 mLCH<sub>4</sub>/gVS and 289±9.0 mLCH<sub>4</sub>/gVS for W-D and WE-D, respectively, compared to 235±57 mLCH<sub>4</sub>/gVS without alkaline pretreatment), and iii) sustainability analysis, which includes the assessment of the biomass exploitation for β-carotene extraction and biomethane production. The most sustainable biorefinery was W-D as it achieved the highest biomass exploitation (33.8%), compared to WE-D (29.1%), W-I (33.1%) or WE-I (32.8%). This underscores the novelty and effectiveness of direct alkaline pretreatments for enhancing both antioxidant potential and energy recovery from <em>D. salina</em> biomass in a biorefinery context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":253,"journal":{"name":"Biomass & Bioenergy","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 107474"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass & Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953424004276","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research aims to assess the effect of alkaline pretreatments on the antioxidant potential of β-carotene-rich extracts from the microalga Dunaliella salina and the cumulative biomethane production from its spent biomass, within the framework of a circular economy approach using four biorefineries. A solvent screening was performed, with ethyl acetate achieving the maximum β-carotene extraction yield (5.3% ± 0.03%). Alkaline pretreatments were applied to the initial biomass (direct) and extracts after a extraction with ethyl acetate (indirect), using two matrices: water (W) and a mixture water:ethanol (WE). Direct alkaline pretreatments (D) offered extracts with higher potential than indirect pretreatments (I) in terms of: i) antioxidant capacity, as measured by ABTS•+ assay (0.69±0.1 and 0.61±0.1 mmolTE/gDW for W-D and WE-D, respectively, and 0.55±0.1 and 0.53±0.1 mmolTE/gDW for W-I and WE-I, respectively) and •OH scavenging activity (1.89±0.2 and 2.05±0.5 mmolTE/gDW for W-D and WE-D, respectively, and 0.48±0 and 1.2±0.3 mmolTE/gDW for W-I and WE-I, respectively), ii) biomethane production from their spent biomass (301±14 mLCH4/gVS and 289±9.0 mLCH4/gVS for W-D and WE-D, respectively, compared to 235±57 mLCH4/gVS without alkaline pretreatment), and iii) sustainability analysis, which includes the assessment of the biomass exploitation for β-carotene extraction and biomethane production. The most sustainable biorefinery was W-D as it achieved the highest biomass exploitation (33.8%), compared to WE-D (29.1%), W-I (33.1%) or WE-I (32.8%). This underscores the novelty and effectiveness of direct alkaline pretreatments for enhancing both antioxidant potential and energy recovery from D. salina biomass in a biorefinery context.
期刊介绍:
Biomass & Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers and short communications, review articles and case studies on biological resources, chemical and biological processes, and biomass products for new renewable sources of energy and materials.
The scope of the journal extends to the environmental, management and economic aspects of biomass and bioenergy.
Key areas covered by the journal:
• Biomass: sources, energy crop production processes, genetic improvements, composition. Please note that research on these biomass subjects must be linked directly to bioenergy generation.
• Biological Residues: residues/rests from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (palm, sugar etc), processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Papers on the use of biomass residues through innovative processes/technological novelty and/or consideration of feedstock/system sustainability (or unsustainability) are welcomed. However waste treatment processes and pollution control or mitigation which are only tangentially related to bioenergy are not in the scope of the journal, as they are more suited to publications in the environmental arena. Papers that describe conventional waste streams (ie well described in existing literature) that do not empirically address ''new'' added value from the process are not suitable for submission to the journal.
• Bioenergy Processes: fermentations, thermochemical conversions, liquid and gaseous fuels, and petrochemical substitutes
• Bioenergy Utilization: direct combustion, gasification, electricity production, chemical processes, and by-product remediation
• Biomass and the Environment: carbon cycle, the net energy efficiency of bioenergy systems, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.