Mohamed Saad Hellal , Filip Gamon , Grzegorz Cema , Kishore Kumar Kadimpati , Aleksandra Ziembińska-Buczyńska , Joanna Surmacz-Górska
{"title":"Improving in-situ biomethanation of sewage sludge under mesophilic conditions: Performance and microbial community analysis","authors":"Mohamed Saad Hellal , Filip Gamon , Grzegorz Cema , Kishore Kumar Kadimpati , Aleksandra Ziembińska-Buczyńska , Joanna Surmacz-Górska","doi":"10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research investigated the application of in-situ biological hydrogen methanation within a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) system under mesophilic conditions, with sewage sludge used as the substrate. Two CSTRs with an effective capacity of 5 L were installed and loaded with inoculum sludge with a volatile solid (VS) concentration of 1.2–1.5 %. They were fed mixed waste sludge with an organic loading rate (OLR) of 1.5 g VS/L and an average sludge retention time (SRT) of 19 days under mesophilic conditions at 37 °C. One of the reactors operated as a control, while the other was injected with H<sub>2</sub> through a microceramic membrane diffuser with a H<sub>2</sub>:CO<sub>2</sub> ratio of 4:1. The results of this study revealed that the addition of H<sub>2</sub> and the recirculation of residual hydrogen in biogas led to a substantial increase in the production of methane from 157 L/kg VS to 275 L/kg VS. Increasing the methane content in biogas from 52 % to 78 % yielded an impressive 42.8 % higher methane production rate. Metataxonomic analysis of the microbial community via high-throughput sequencing techniques revealed that the dominant acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens were <em>Methanosaeta</em> and <em>Methanoregula</em>, respectively, with greater abundances of both groups in the experimental bioreactor. The dynamics of their activity in both bioreactors were analyzed via qPCR, and the functional genes encoding methyl-coenzyme M reductase (<em>mcrA</em> gene) and hydrogenase Ni-Fe presented comparable changes between RI and RII. By optimizing key operational parameters and closely examining the dynamics of the microbial community, this approach can contribute significantly to sustainable bioenergy solutions while minimizing environmental impact.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":253,"journal":{"name":"Biomass & Bioenergy","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 107487"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass & Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953424004409","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research investigated the application of in-situ biological hydrogen methanation within a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) system under mesophilic conditions, with sewage sludge used as the substrate. Two CSTRs with an effective capacity of 5 L were installed and loaded with inoculum sludge with a volatile solid (VS) concentration of 1.2–1.5 %. They were fed mixed waste sludge with an organic loading rate (OLR) of 1.5 g VS/L and an average sludge retention time (SRT) of 19 days under mesophilic conditions at 37 °C. One of the reactors operated as a control, while the other was injected with H2 through a microceramic membrane diffuser with a H2:CO2 ratio of 4:1. The results of this study revealed that the addition of H2 and the recirculation of residual hydrogen in biogas led to a substantial increase in the production of methane from 157 L/kg VS to 275 L/kg VS. Increasing the methane content in biogas from 52 % to 78 % yielded an impressive 42.8 % higher methane production rate. Metataxonomic analysis of the microbial community via high-throughput sequencing techniques revealed that the dominant acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens were Methanosaeta and Methanoregula, respectively, with greater abundances of both groups in the experimental bioreactor. The dynamics of their activity in both bioreactors were analyzed via qPCR, and the functional genes encoding methyl-coenzyme M reductase (mcrA gene) and hydrogenase Ni-Fe presented comparable changes between RI and RII. By optimizing key operational parameters and closely examining the dynamics of the microbial community, this approach can contribute significantly to sustainable bioenergy solutions while minimizing environmental impact.
期刊介绍:
Biomass & Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers and short communications, review articles and case studies on biological resources, chemical and biological processes, and biomass products for new renewable sources of energy and materials.
The scope of the journal extends to the environmental, management and economic aspects of biomass and bioenergy.
Key areas covered by the journal:
• Biomass: sources, energy crop production processes, genetic improvements, composition. Please note that research on these biomass subjects must be linked directly to bioenergy generation.
• Biological Residues: residues/rests from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (palm, sugar etc), processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Papers on the use of biomass residues through innovative processes/technological novelty and/or consideration of feedstock/system sustainability (or unsustainability) are welcomed. However waste treatment processes and pollution control or mitigation which are only tangentially related to bioenergy are not in the scope of the journal, as they are more suited to publications in the environmental arena. Papers that describe conventional waste streams (ie well described in existing literature) that do not empirically address ''new'' added value from the process are not suitable for submission to the journal.
• Bioenergy Processes: fermentations, thermochemical conversions, liquid and gaseous fuels, and petrochemical substitutes
• Bioenergy Utilization: direct combustion, gasification, electricity production, chemical processes, and by-product remediation
• Biomass and the Environment: carbon cycle, the net energy efficiency of bioenergy systems, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.