Shixu Guo , Xiang He , Fei Liu , Jianchao Yang , Shanchuan Sun
{"title":"Fragmentation behavior and velocity formula for secondary fragments from RC slabs during contact explosions","authors":"Shixu Guo , Xiang He , Fei Liu , Jianchao Yang , Shanchuan Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.109047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The failure process of reinforced concrete (RC) slabs under contact explosion is dominated by localized damages, accompanied by numerous flying fragments. These concrete fragments pose a significant threat to personnel and equipment, as well as causing dynamic deformation and failure of the retrofitting materials used to restrain the fragments. The behavior of concrete fragmentation during explosions has been seldom studied experimentally, and few fragment velocity formulas exist that incorporate multiple factors. In this paper, the fragmentation process is recorded using two high-speed cameras, revealing that concrete fragmentation during explosions exhibits notable zoning characteristics, with the maximum velocity observed at the center of the fragment cloud’s front. To predict this maximum velocity, a model is derived from dimensional analysis. Utilizing this model, velocity prediction formulas are proposed and validated by 29 contact explosion tests. The formulas consider the explosive-rebar position, slab thickness, explosive mass and explosive shape, and are further improved by considering the concrete cover. The results indicate that, when the slab is not breached, the deceleration of rebar on fragments is weak. However, once the slab is breached, this deceleration becomes increasingly significant as the defined scaled thickness (<em>T</em><sub>S</sub>) decreases. In the limiting case, the fragment velocity when the charge is located above the rebar is 0.636 times that of when the charge avoids the rebar. Fragments when the charge avoids the rebar, should be regarded as the most unfavorable case in secondary fragment hazards assessment and structural design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11677,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Failure Analysis","volume":"167 ","pages":"Article 109047"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Failure Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350630724010938","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The failure process of reinforced concrete (RC) slabs under contact explosion is dominated by localized damages, accompanied by numerous flying fragments. These concrete fragments pose a significant threat to personnel and equipment, as well as causing dynamic deformation and failure of the retrofitting materials used to restrain the fragments. The behavior of concrete fragmentation during explosions has been seldom studied experimentally, and few fragment velocity formulas exist that incorporate multiple factors. In this paper, the fragmentation process is recorded using two high-speed cameras, revealing that concrete fragmentation during explosions exhibits notable zoning characteristics, with the maximum velocity observed at the center of the fragment cloud’s front. To predict this maximum velocity, a model is derived from dimensional analysis. Utilizing this model, velocity prediction formulas are proposed and validated by 29 contact explosion tests. The formulas consider the explosive-rebar position, slab thickness, explosive mass and explosive shape, and are further improved by considering the concrete cover. The results indicate that, when the slab is not breached, the deceleration of rebar on fragments is weak. However, once the slab is breached, this deceleration becomes increasingly significant as the defined scaled thickness (TS) decreases. In the limiting case, the fragment velocity when the charge is located above the rebar is 0.636 times that of when the charge avoids the rebar. Fragments when the charge avoids the rebar, should be regarded as the most unfavorable case in secondary fragment hazards assessment and structural design.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Failure Analysis publishes research papers describing the analysis of engineering failures and related studies.
Papers relating to the structure, properties and behaviour of engineering materials are encouraged, particularly those which also involve the detailed application of materials parameters to problems in engineering structures, components and design. In addition to the area of materials engineering, the interacting fields of mechanical, manufacturing, aeronautical, civil, chemical, corrosion and design engineering are considered relevant. Activity should be directed at analysing engineering failures and carrying out research to help reduce the incidences of failures and to extend the operating horizons of engineering materials.
Emphasis is placed on the mechanical properties of materials and their behaviour when influenced by structure, process and environment. Metallic, polymeric, ceramic and natural materials are all included and the application of these materials to real engineering situations should be emphasised. The use of a case-study based approach is also encouraged.
Engineering Failure Analysis provides essential reference material and critical feedback into the design process thereby contributing to the prevention of engineering failures in the future. All submissions will be subject to peer review from leading experts in the field.