A global comparative analysis of local recreation behaviors and values in peri-urban forests

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Marc Djahangard , Sophie Buckwitz , Chika Hioki , Jingyu He , Zhenbang Zhou , Han Zhang , Rasoul Yousefpour
{"title":"A global comparative analysis of local recreation behaviors and values in peri-urban forests","authors":"Marc Djahangard ,&nbsp;Sophie Buckwitz ,&nbsp;Chika Hioki ,&nbsp;Jingyu He ,&nbsp;Zhenbang Zhou ,&nbsp;Han Zhang ,&nbsp;Rasoul Yousefpour","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2024.100525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recreation is an essential ecosystem service (ES) provided by urban and peri-urban forests. In the context of adapting forest management to social demands, it is important to understand recreation behavior and the value that people place on their recreation. This study presents a comparison of recreation behavior and willingness to pay (WTP) across four peri-urban forests located in Freiburg (Germany), Oakville (Canada), Xi'an (China) and Zomba (Malawi). WTP was asked under two contingent valuation scenarios, one to improve the forest management according to the respondents' preferences for forest characteristics and the other to sustain the forest under climate change impacts. We conducted on-site surveys, focusing on the inhabitants of the associated cities. While the recreationists were generally satisfied with the forest infrastructure (e.g., paths), they were rather dissatisfied with the facilities (e.g., sanitation and drinking water). The mean annual WTP (adjusted by purchasing-power-parity, PPP) to improve the forest management was 21.07US$ PPP in Freiburg, 18.53US$ PPP in Oakville, 8.32US$ PPP in Xi'an, and 3.52US$ PPP in Zomba. Under climate change impacts, the mean annual WTP was 27.96US$ PPP in Freiburg, 19.29US$ PPP in Oakville, 7.52US$ PPP in Xi'an, and 3.53US$ PPP in Zomba. The statistical analysis revealed a positive effect of income on WTP in Freiburg, Oakville, and Xi'an. In addition, in Freiburg, education increased WTP, while in Xi'an, younger participants were more likely to pay. In Freiburg and Zomba, belief in climate change was found to increase the probability of WTP under the climate change scenario. Regarding the payment vehicle, a local tax and a voluntary donation were preferred in Freiburg and Oakville, an entry fee in Xi'an, and there was no preference in Zomba.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100525"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724001934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recreation is an essential ecosystem service (ES) provided by urban and peri-urban forests. In the context of adapting forest management to social demands, it is important to understand recreation behavior and the value that people place on their recreation. This study presents a comparison of recreation behavior and willingness to pay (WTP) across four peri-urban forests located in Freiburg (Germany), Oakville (Canada), Xi'an (China) and Zomba (Malawi). WTP was asked under two contingent valuation scenarios, one to improve the forest management according to the respondents' preferences for forest characteristics and the other to sustain the forest under climate change impacts. We conducted on-site surveys, focusing on the inhabitants of the associated cities. While the recreationists were generally satisfied with the forest infrastructure (e.g., paths), they were rather dissatisfied with the facilities (e.g., sanitation and drinking water). The mean annual WTP (adjusted by purchasing-power-parity, PPP) to improve the forest management was 21.07US$ PPP in Freiburg, 18.53US$ PPP in Oakville, 8.32US$ PPP in Xi'an, and 3.52US$ PPP in Zomba. Under climate change impacts, the mean annual WTP was 27.96US$ PPP in Freiburg, 19.29US$ PPP in Oakville, 7.52US$ PPP in Xi'an, and 3.53US$ PPP in Zomba. The statistical analysis revealed a positive effect of income on WTP in Freiburg, Oakville, and Xi'an. In addition, in Freiburg, education increased WTP, while in Xi'an, younger participants were more likely to pay. In Freiburg and Zomba, belief in climate change was found to increase the probability of WTP under the climate change scenario. Regarding the payment vehicle, a local tax and a voluntary donation were preferred in Freiburg and Oakville, an entry fee in Xi'an, and there was no preference in Zomba.
城郊森林当地娱乐行为和价值的全球比较分析
娱乐是城市和城郊森林提供的一项重要生态系统服务 (ES)。在使森林管理适应社会需求的背景下,了解人们的娱乐行为和娱乐价值非常重要。本研究比较了位于弗莱堡(德国)、奥克维尔(加拿大)、西安(中国)和松巴(马拉维)的四座城郊森林的娱乐行为和支付意愿(WTP)。在两种或然估价情景下询问了 WTP,一种是根据受访者对森林特征的偏好改善森林管理,另一种是在气候变化影响下维持森林。我们进行了现场调查,重点是相关城市的居民。虽然休闲者普遍对森林基础设施(如道路)感到满意,但他们对设施(如卫生设施和饮用水)却相当不满意。改善森林管理的年平均 WTP(按购买力平价调整)在弗莱堡为 21.07 美元(购买力平价),在奥克维尔为 18.53 美元(购买力平价),在西安为 8.32 美元(购买力平价),在松巴为 3.52 美元(购买力平价)。在气候变化影响下,弗赖堡的年平均 WTP 为 27.96 美元购买力平价,奥克维尔为 19.29 美元购买力平价,西安为 7.52 美元购买力平价,松巴为 3.53 美元购买力平价。统计分析显示,在弗莱堡、奥克维尔和西安,收入对 WTP 有正向影响。此外,在弗赖堡,受教育程度增加了 WTP,而在西安,年轻的参与者更有可能支付。在弗莱堡和松巴,人们发现在气候变化情景下,对气候变化的信念会增加WTP的可能性。关于支付工具,弗赖堡和奥克维尔的参与者更倾向于地方税和自愿捐款,西安的参与者更倾向于入门费,而松巴的参与者则没有偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信