Xingji Lu , Jinhua Lu , Fangjun Wang , Haoyuan Gao
{"title":"Experimental investigation on failure mechanism of stepped footings rocking on bedrock","authors":"Xingji Lu , Jinhua Lu , Fangjun Wang , Haoyuan Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The gravity pier with a multiple-step footing is a common substructure system in railway bridges in China, particularly on bedrock. Rocking of this system benefits its seismic performance during the earthquake, but the cantilever part of the stepped footing is vulnerable since it is loaded with a large eccentricity, which has not been well studied. The present paper investigates the failure mechanisms and load capacity of two-layer stepped footing, based on two quasi-static tests and twenty finite element analyses, where four parameters in the stepped footing are studied: the longitudinal reinforcement ratio, the shear span to depth ratio, the critical contact area ratio, and the aspect ratio. In all investigations, the bottom step of the footings fails in flexure. The two quasi-static tests reveal that with the increase of the longitudinal reinforcement ratio in the footing, the load capacity at peak increases, and the damages at the footing are slighter, whereas the damages at the pier body become severe. The finite element models of the two test specimens are first built, and the validations show the finite element results agree well with the test results. The remaining finite element analyses further find that increasing the critical contact area ratio, increasing the aspect ratio, or decreasing the shear span to depth ratio significantly reduces the extent of damage to the footing and increases the load capacities at different damage states. Moreover, the investigations also find damages at the pier body are influenced by the four parameters studied. As the longitudinal reinforcement ratio or critical contact area ratio increases, the damages at the pier body become severe. Whereas, increasing the shear span to depth ratio or the aspect ratio results in slighter damages at the pier body.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"323 ","pages":"Article 119300"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029624018625","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The gravity pier with a multiple-step footing is a common substructure system in railway bridges in China, particularly on bedrock. Rocking of this system benefits its seismic performance during the earthquake, but the cantilever part of the stepped footing is vulnerable since it is loaded with a large eccentricity, which has not been well studied. The present paper investigates the failure mechanisms and load capacity of two-layer stepped footing, based on two quasi-static tests and twenty finite element analyses, where four parameters in the stepped footing are studied: the longitudinal reinforcement ratio, the shear span to depth ratio, the critical contact area ratio, and the aspect ratio. In all investigations, the bottom step of the footings fails in flexure. The two quasi-static tests reveal that with the increase of the longitudinal reinforcement ratio in the footing, the load capacity at peak increases, and the damages at the footing are slighter, whereas the damages at the pier body become severe. The finite element models of the two test specimens are first built, and the validations show the finite element results agree well with the test results. The remaining finite element analyses further find that increasing the critical contact area ratio, increasing the aspect ratio, or decreasing the shear span to depth ratio significantly reduces the extent of damage to the footing and increases the load capacities at different damage states. Moreover, the investigations also find damages at the pier body are influenced by the four parameters studied. As the longitudinal reinforcement ratio or critical contact area ratio increases, the damages at the pier body become severe. Whereas, increasing the shear span to depth ratio or the aspect ratio results in slighter damages at the pier body.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.