Punching failure and analytical model for rectangular flat slabs with equal flexural capacities in orthogonal directions

IF 5.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Bowen Zheng , Wenzhong Zheng , Yanzhe Zhang , Gang Wang
{"title":"Punching failure and analytical model for rectangular flat slabs with equal flexural capacities in orthogonal directions","authors":"Bowen Zheng ,&nbsp;Wenzhong Zheng ,&nbsp;Yanzhe Zhang ,&nbsp;Gang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the practical use of rectangular flat slabs with equal flexural capacities in orthogonal directions, their punching behavior has not been addressed. In this paper, the mechanical behavior of such slabs under varying tensile reinforcement ratios and plan dimensions has been investigated, using nonlinear finite element analysis in ABAQUS. Initially, the numerical model of the interior slab-column connection under static vertical loads was developed and thoroughly verified using 20 symmetrical and 9 asymmetrical specimens, covering wide variations in various parameters. Subsequently, parametric studies were conducted on rectangular slabs with equal flexural capacities in both directions, utilizing 54 simulations. The results indicated that the slab aspect ratio strongly affected the load-rotation curves, tensile reinforcement stress, cracking patterns, and shear forces in both directions, as well as their symmetry, despite being designed with equal flexural capacities in orthogonal directions. A novel approach, derived from the critical shear crack theory (CSCT), was developed for this slab type and then compared with existing models. It is noted that the ACI code cannot accurately predict the punching capacity. Although the EN1992–1-1 (2023), MC2010, and CSCT models accurately predict punching capacity, especially when the MC2010 and CSCT models account for two directional rotations, they lack in predicting deformation capacity. However, the proposed model offers accurate predictions for punching and deformation capacities. Its innovations include refining the load-rotation equation, validating the CSCT failure criterion, and quantifying the non-uniform shear force between orthogonal directions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"323 ","pages":"Article 119305"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029624018674","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the practical use of rectangular flat slabs with equal flexural capacities in orthogonal directions, their punching behavior has not been addressed. In this paper, the mechanical behavior of such slabs under varying tensile reinforcement ratios and plan dimensions has been investigated, using nonlinear finite element analysis in ABAQUS. Initially, the numerical model of the interior slab-column connection under static vertical loads was developed and thoroughly verified using 20 symmetrical and 9 asymmetrical specimens, covering wide variations in various parameters. Subsequently, parametric studies were conducted on rectangular slabs with equal flexural capacities in both directions, utilizing 54 simulations. The results indicated that the slab aspect ratio strongly affected the load-rotation curves, tensile reinforcement stress, cracking patterns, and shear forces in both directions, as well as their symmetry, despite being designed with equal flexural capacities in orthogonal directions. A novel approach, derived from the critical shear crack theory (CSCT), was developed for this slab type and then compared with existing models. It is noted that the ACI code cannot accurately predict the punching capacity. Although the EN1992–1-1 (2023), MC2010, and CSCT models accurately predict punching capacity, especially when the MC2010 and CSCT models account for two directional rotations, they lack in predicting deformation capacity. However, the proposed model offers accurate predictions for punching and deformation capacities. Its innovations include refining the load-rotation equation, validating the CSCT failure criterion, and quantifying the non-uniform shear force between orthogonal directions.
正交方向抗弯能力相等的矩形平板的冲压破坏和分析模型
尽管在正交方向上具有相等抗弯能力的矩形平板已被实际使用,但其冲孔行为尚未得到解决。本文使用 ABAQUS 中的非线性有限元分析,研究了这种板在不同拉伸配筋比和平面尺寸下的力学行为。首先,开发了内部板柱连接在静态垂直荷载下的数值模型,并使用 20 个对称试样和 9 个不对称试样进行了全面验证,涵盖了各种参数的广泛变化。随后,利用 54 次模拟,对双向抗弯能力相等的矩形板进行了参数研究。结果表明,尽管设计时正交方向的抗弯能力相等,但板的长宽比对荷载-旋转曲线、拉伸钢筋应力、开裂模式和两个方向的剪力以及对称性有很大影响。根据临界剪切裂缝理论(CSCT)为这种板型开发了一种新方法,然后与现有模型进行了比较。我们注意到,ACI 规范无法准确预测冲孔能力。尽管 EN1992-1-1 (2023)、MC2010 和 CSCT 模型能准确预测冲孔能力,特别是当 MC2010 和 CSCT 模型考虑到两个方向的旋转时,它们在预测变形能力方面有所欠缺。然而,所提出的模型能准确预测冲压和变形能力。其创新之处在于完善了载荷旋转方程,验证了 CSCT 失效准则,并量化了正交方向之间的非均匀剪切力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信