Effect of model architecture and input parameters to improve performance of artificial intelligence models for estimating concrete strength using SonReb
{"title":"Effect of model architecture and input parameters to improve performance of artificial intelligence models for estimating concrete strength using SonReb","authors":"Seyed Alireza Alavi, Martin Noel","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) with the non-intrusive SonReb method, which combines Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) and Rebound Number (RN) to predict concrete compressive strength, has attracted increasing attention in recent years. This study introduces a novel approach to improve AI models for predicting concrete strength, making them more suitable for future practical applications. One of the key challenge in AI models is the number of input parameters; while more inputs often improve accuracy, they are typically impractical for most applications dealing with existing structures (e.g., requiring detailed concrete mix design information that is often unavailable). SonReb AI-based models which use only two input parameters (UPV and RN) have shown reasonable accuracy, but their general use is limited by adoption of different testing standards which precludes the development of large databases. This study aims to improve two-parameter SonReb-based AI models through the addition of a binary input variable that represents the type of the specimen geometry (cube or cylinder) and investigates the effect of model architecture by comparing three different AI algorithms: Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Deep Neural Networks (DNN), and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS). Six AI models were developed using 514 data points from experimental tests and collected data, and an unbiased data splitting method was applied for training and testing. The results showed that including specimen geometry improved model accuracy across all AI algorithms. The results of this study show that regardless of AI architecture, the proposed novel approach not only improves the accuracy of models, but also enables the use of larger databases containing both cubic and cylindrical specimens.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"323 ","pages":"Article 119285"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029624018479","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) with the non-intrusive SonReb method, which combines Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) and Rebound Number (RN) to predict concrete compressive strength, has attracted increasing attention in recent years. This study introduces a novel approach to improve AI models for predicting concrete strength, making them more suitable for future practical applications. One of the key challenge in AI models is the number of input parameters; while more inputs often improve accuracy, they are typically impractical for most applications dealing with existing structures (e.g., requiring detailed concrete mix design information that is often unavailable). SonReb AI-based models which use only two input parameters (UPV and RN) have shown reasonable accuracy, but their general use is limited by adoption of different testing standards which precludes the development of large databases. This study aims to improve two-parameter SonReb-based AI models through the addition of a binary input variable that represents the type of the specimen geometry (cube or cylinder) and investigates the effect of model architecture by comparing three different AI algorithms: Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Deep Neural Networks (DNN), and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS). Six AI models were developed using 514 data points from experimental tests and collected data, and an unbiased data splitting method was applied for training and testing. The results showed that including specimen geometry improved model accuracy across all AI algorithms. The results of this study show that regardless of AI architecture, the proposed novel approach not only improves the accuracy of models, but also enables the use of larger databases containing both cubic and cylindrical specimens.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.