Nasser Mohamed , Michel Laurent , Ferrier Emmanuel , Gabor Aron , Gardes Rémi , Boisson Richard , Huet Philippe , Clément Poissonnet , Dolo jean-marie
{"title":"Impact of incorporating parallel-threaded mechanical coupler splices on the seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete columns","authors":"Nasser Mohamed , Michel Laurent , Ferrier Emmanuel , Gabor Aron , Gardes Rémi , Boisson Richard , Huet Philippe , Clément Poissonnet , Dolo jean-marie","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study compared the performance of reinforced concrete (RC) columns using mechanical couplers with that of traditional overlapping splices under axial and cyclic loading conditions. Splicing methods incorporating larger diameters are critical for ensuring the structural integrity of large structures, for which safety is of paramount importance. Overlapping splices often result in congestion and poor construction quality owing to the complex RC detailing in the joints. Mechanical couplers enable efficient installation and provide economic benefits. In this study, RC columns with different splicing configurations were tested using quasistatic cyclic lateral loading. The coupler properties, geometry, and position were analysed. The results demonstrate that mechanical couplers can maintain or slightly enhance the ductility, energy dissipation, and self-centring capacity while effectively maintaining the stiffness and strength. These findings suggest that mechanical couplers are superior alternatives to traditional rebar splicing methods for improving the overall performance and reliability of RC structures in large-scale construction projects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"323 ","pages":"Article 119289"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029624018510","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study compared the performance of reinforced concrete (RC) columns using mechanical couplers with that of traditional overlapping splices under axial and cyclic loading conditions. Splicing methods incorporating larger diameters are critical for ensuring the structural integrity of large structures, for which safety is of paramount importance. Overlapping splices often result in congestion and poor construction quality owing to the complex RC detailing in the joints. Mechanical couplers enable efficient installation and provide economic benefits. In this study, RC columns with different splicing configurations were tested using quasistatic cyclic lateral loading. The coupler properties, geometry, and position were analysed. The results demonstrate that mechanical couplers can maintain or slightly enhance the ductility, energy dissipation, and self-centring capacity while effectively maintaining the stiffness and strength. These findings suggest that mechanical couplers are superior alternatives to traditional rebar splicing methods for improving the overall performance and reliability of RC structures in large-scale construction projects.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.