Diagnosis and treatment of abdominally inserted (sacrocolpopexy/sacrohysteropexy) mesh complications for vault/uterine prolapse

Karen Ward , Eric Bautrant , Gaurav Khatri , Sarah Love-Jones , Phyllis Glanc , Charlotte Korte , Nicolle Germano , Sherif Mourad , Hashim Hashim
{"title":"Diagnosis and treatment of abdominally inserted (sacrocolpopexy/sacrohysteropexy) mesh complications for vault/uterine prolapse","authors":"Karen Ward ,&nbsp;Eric Bautrant ,&nbsp;Gaurav Khatri ,&nbsp;Sarah Love-Jones ,&nbsp;Phyllis Glanc ,&nbsp;Charlotte Korte ,&nbsp;Nicolle Germano ,&nbsp;Sherif Mourad ,&nbsp;Hashim Hashim","doi":"10.1016/j.cont.2024.101718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background:</h3><div>Sacrohysteropexy and sacrocolpopexy are established treatments of uterine or vaginal vault prolapse respectively and involve insertion of mesh abdominally, often using permanent sutures and fixation devices. Complications following these procedures may be serious, and there is lack of evidence about long-term functional outcomes in terms of pain, dyspareunia and development of lower urinary tract and bowel symptoms.</div></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>A non-systematic review of the available literature was performed and recommendations on assessment and management were developed by expert consensus.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>The current evidence is limited in quantity and quality, and recommendations on assessment management of mesh-related complications were made by experts in the field. Assessment and treatment of complications following abdominally placed mesh for pelvic organ prolapse will often require a multidisciplinary approach. Assessment may require EUA, and/or cystourethroscopy, sigmoidoscopy, and laparoscopy. MRI is the most useful imaging modality. Surgery to remove mesh carries a risk of urinary tract and bowel injury, as well as development of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse. A joint decision between the surgeon and the patient should be made before embarking on a partial removal of mesh; removal of all the mesh may be a better option albeit with higher risk of surgical complications. Complete removal of mesh and tacks or sutures from the sacral attachment may not be possible and is associated with risk of major haemorrhage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72702,"journal":{"name":"Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 101718"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772973724009937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:

Sacrohysteropexy and sacrocolpopexy are established treatments of uterine or vaginal vault prolapse respectively and involve insertion of mesh abdominally, often using permanent sutures and fixation devices. Complications following these procedures may be serious, and there is lack of evidence about long-term functional outcomes in terms of pain, dyspareunia and development of lower urinary tract and bowel symptoms.

Objective:

A non-systematic review of the available literature was performed and recommendations on assessment and management were developed by expert consensus.

Conclusion:

The current evidence is limited in quantity and quality, and recommendations on assessment management of mesh-related complications were made by experts in the field. Assessment and treatment of complications following abdominally placed mesh for pelvic organ prolapse will often require a multidisciplinary approach. Assessment may require EUA, and/or cystourethroscopy, sigmoidoscopy, and laparoscopy. MRI is the most useful imaging modality. Surgery to remove mesh carries a risk of urinary tract and bowel injury, as well as development of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse. A joint decision between the surgeon and the patient should be made before embarking on a partial removal of mesh; removal of all the mesh may be a better option albeit with higher risk of surgical complications. Complete removal of mesh and tacks or sutures from the sacral attachment may not be possible and is associated with risk of major haemorrhage.
诊断和治疗膀胱/子宫脱垂的腹腔置入(骶骨整形术/骶乳头整形术)网片并发症
背景:骶尾肌下垂术和骶尾肌结扎术分别是治疗子宫或阴道穹窿脱垂的成熟疗法,需要在腹部植入网片,通常使用永久缝合线和固定装置。这些手术后的并发症可能很严重,而且在疼痛、排便困难以及出现下尿路和肠道症状等长期功能性结果方面缺乏证据。目的:对现有文献进行了非系统性回顾,并通过专家共识制定了评估和管理建议。结论:目前的证据在数量和质量上都很有限,网片相关并发症的评估管理建议是由该领域的专家提出的。腹腔置入网片治疗盆腔器官脱垂后并发症的评估和治疗通常需要多学科方法。评估可能需要膀胱尿道镜、乙状结肠镜和腹腔镜检查。核磁共振成像是最有用的成像方式。手术切除网片存在尿路和肠道损伤以及盆腔器官脱垂复发的风险。在开始部分切除网片之前,外科医生和患者应共同做出决定;尽管手术并发症的风险较高,但切除所有网片可能是更好的选择。完全切除网片和骶骨附件上的大头针或缝线可能是不可能的,而且会有大出血的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信