Prognostic value of preoperative high-sensitivity C-reactive protein to albumin ratio in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy receiving pacemaker therapy: A retrospective two-center study in China

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jiaqi Pan , Enrui Zhang , Jie Han , Haiyu Zou , Liangrong Zheng
{"title":"Prognostic value of preoperative high-sensitivity C-reactive protein to albumin ratio in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy receiving pacemaker therapy: A retrospective two-center study in China","authors":"Jiaqi Pan ,&nbsp;Enrui Zhang ,&nbsp;Jie Han ,&nbsp;Haiyu Zou ,&nbsp;Liangrong Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite receiving pacemaker therapy, patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) due to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) remain at an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. The high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)-to-albumin ratio (CAR) is a novel indicator. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of preoperative CAR in this population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with DCM who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) implantation for HFrEF between 2018 and 2023 were involved. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Cox regression models were used to investigate predictors for MACE. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was utilized to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy and identify the optimal cutoff point.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We enrolled 250 patients, of whom 78 experienced MACE. Patients who experienced MACE had a significantly higher CAR than those without MACE (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated CAR as an independent predictor for MACE (hazard ratio = 4.301, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.833–10.091, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). ROC curve analysis demonstrated the discriminatory ability of CAR in predicting MACE (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.732, 95 % CI 0.666–0.792, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), with an optimal threshold of 0.08. Furthermore, the incidence of MACE was significantly higher in the high-CAR (&gt; 0.08) group compared to the low-CAR (≤ 0.08) group (48.8 % vs. 13.6 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Among patients with DCM and HFrEF treated with CRT or ICD, CAR can serve as an independent risk predictor, with higher levels associated with poorer outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38026,"journal":{"name":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101554"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906724002203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Despite receiving pacemaker therapy, patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) due to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) remain at an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. The high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)-to-albumin ratio (CAR) is a novel indicator. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of preoperative CAR in this population.

Methods

Patients with DCM who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) implantation for HFrEF between 2018 and 2023 were involved. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Cox regression models were used to investigate predictors for MACE. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was utilized to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy and identify the optimal cutoff point.

Results

We enrolled 250 patients, of whom 78 experienced MACE. Patients who experienced MACE had a significantly higher CAR than those without MACE (p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated CAR as an independent predictor for MACE (hazard ratio = 4.301, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.833–10.091, p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis demonstrated the discriminatory ability of CAR in predicting MACE (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.732, 95 % CI 0.666–0.792, p < 0.001), with an optimal threshold of 0.08. Furthermore, the incidence of MACE was significantly higher in the high-CAR (> 0.08) group compared to the low-CAR (≤ 0.08) group (48.8 % vs. 13.6 %, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Among patients with DCM and HFrEF treated with CRT or ICD, CAR can serve as an independent risk predictor, with higher levels associated with poorer outcomes.

Abstract Image

接受起搏器治疗的扩张型心肌病患者术前高敏C反应蛋白与白蛋白比值的预后价值:中国双中心回顾性研究
背景尽管接受了起搏器治疗,但因扩张型心肌病(DCM)导致射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者发生不良心血管事件的风险仍在增加。高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)-白蛋白比值(CAR)是一项新指标。本研究旨在评估术前CAR在这一人群中的预后价值。方法研究对象为2018年至2023年间因HFrEF接受心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)或植入式心脏除颤器(ICD)植入术的DCM患者。主要终点为主要心脏不良事件(MACE)。Cox回归模型用于研究MACE的预测因素。利用接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估诊断效果并确定最佳截断点。发生 MACE 的患者的 CAR 值明显高于未发生 MACE 的患者(p < 0.001)。多变量 Cox 回归分析表明,CAR 是 MACE 的独立预测因子(危险比 = 4.301,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.833-10.091,p < 0.001)。ROC 曲线分析表明了 CAR 预测 MACE 的鉴别能力(曲线下面积 [AUC] = 0.732,95 % 置信区间 [CI] 0.666-0.792,p <0.001),最佳阈值为 0.08。结论在接受 CRT 或 ICD 治疗的 DCM 和 HFrEF 患者中,CAR 可作为独立的风险预测因子,其水平越高,预后越差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IJC Heart and Vasculature
IJC Heart and Vasculature Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
10.30%
发文量
216
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: IJC Heart & Vasculature is an online-only, open-access journal dedicated to publishing original articles and reviews (also Editorials and Letters to the Editor) which report on structural and functional cardiovascular pathology, with an emphasis on imaging and disease pathophysiology. Articles must be authentic, educational, clinically relevant, and original in their content and scientific approach. IJC Heart & Vasculature requires the highest standards of scientific integrity in order to promote reliable, reproducible and verifiable research findings. All authors are advised to consult the Principles of Ethical Publishing in the International Journal of Cardiology before submitting a manuscript. Submission of a manuscript to this journal gives the publisher the right to publish that paper if it is accepted. Manuscripts may be edited to improve clarity and expression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信