Ableism in mental healthcare settings: A qualitative study among U.S. adults with disabilities

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Katie Wang , Joan M. Ostrove , Robert B. Manning III , Sarah Fodero , Samuel L. Ash , Jessica Whang , Kathleen R. Bogart , Rebecca Cipollina , Michelle R. Nario-Redmond , Jonathan M. Adler , Sarah R. Lowe
{"title":"Ableism in mental healthcare settings: A qualitative study among U.S. adults with disabilities","authors":"Katie Wang ,&nbsp;Joan M. Ostrove ,&nbsp;Robert B. Manning III ,&nbsp;Sarah Fodero ,&nbsp;Samuel L. Ash ,&nbsp;Jessica Whang ,&nbsp;Kathleen R. Bogart ,&nbsp;Rebecca Cipollina ,&nbsp;Michelle R. Nario-Redmond ,&nbsp;Jonathan M. Adler ,&nbsp;Sarah R. Lowe","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>People with disabilities (PWD) face elevated mental health concerns and are more likely to utilize mental health services compared to their nondisabled counterparts, yet they also report higher unmet mental health service needs due to myriad attitudinal and environmental barriers to accessing care. Despite these well-documented disparities, little research has examined the nuanced lived experiences of PWD who receive mental health services. Drawing upon semi-structured interviews with 20 U.S. adults with disabilities who were diverse in race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and gender identity, the present research examined the various structural and interpersonal processes through which ableism undermines the perceived effectiveness and relevance of mental health services. Reflexive thematic analysis identified six themes that characterized participants' ableism experiences in mental healthcare settings, including misplaced assumptions about the impact of disability on mental health, medical trauma and gaslighting, interpersonal ableism, lack of disability knowledge, accessibility challenges, and systematic ableism. These findings highlight the importance of centering PWD's voices in disability-affirmative mental health research and underscore important clinical considerations for fostering accessible and inclusive mental health services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100498"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524001070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People with disabilities (PWD) face elevated mental health concerns and are more likely to utilize mental health services compared to their nondisabled counterparts, yet they also report higher unmet mental health service needs due to myriad attitudinal and environmental barriers to accessing care. Despite these well-documented disparities, little research has examined the nuanced lived experiences of PWD who receive mental health services. Drawing upon semi-structured interviews with 20 U.S. adults with disabilities who were diverse in race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and gender identity, the present research examined the various structural and interpersonal processes through which ableism undermines the perceived effectiveness and relevance of mental health services. Reflexive thematic analysis identified six themes that characterized participants' ableism experiences in mental healthcare settings, including misplaced assumptions about the impact of disability on mental health, medical trauma and gaslighting, interpersonal ableism, lack of disability knowledge, accessibility challenges, and systematic ableism. These findings highlight the importance of centering PWD's voices in disability-affirmative mental health research and underscore important clinical considerations for fostering accessible and inclusive mental health services.
精神医疗机构中的能力歧视:对美国成年残疾人的定性研究
与非残障人士相比,残障人士(PWD)面临着更多的心理健康问题,也更有可能利用心理健康服务,但由于在获取医疗服务方面存在着无数的态度和环境障碍,他们也报告了更高的未得到满足的心理健康服务需求。尽管这些差异已被充分证明,但很少有研究对接受心理健康服务的残疾人的细微生活体验进行研究。本研究通过对 20 名美国成年残疾人的半结构式访谈,考察了他们在种族/民族、性取向和性别认同方面的差异,研究了能力主义破坏心理健康服务有效性和相关性的各种结构性和人际关系过程。反思性主题分析确定了六个主题,这些主题描述了参与者在精神医疗环境中的能力缺失经历,包括关于残疾对精神健康影响的错误假设、医疗创伤和 "煤气灯"、人际能力缺失、缺乏残疾知识、无障碍挑战和系统性能力缺失。这些发现凸显了在残疾平权心理健康研究中以残疾人的声音为中心的重要性,并强调了促进无障碍和包容性心理健康服务的重要临床考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信