Intersectional Analysis of Social Risk and Need Among a Large Representative Sample of Adults From an Integrated Health System in the U.S.

Meagan C. Brown PhD, MPH , Kara Cushing-Haugen MS , Robert Wellman MS , Caitlin N. Dorsey BA , Consuelo MS Norris MA , John L. Adams PhD , John F. Steiner MD, MPH , Anand R. Shah MD, MS , Cara C. Lewis PhD
{"title":"Intersectional Analysis of Social Risk and Need Among a Large Representative Sample of Adults From an Integrated Health System in the U.S.","authors":"Meagan C. Brown PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Kara Cushing-Haugen MS ,&nbsp;Robert Wellman MS ,&nbsp;Caitlin N. Dorsey BA ,&nbsp;Consuelo MS Norris MA ,&nbsp;John L. Adams PhD ,&nbsp;John F. Steiner MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Anand R. Shah MD, MS ,&nbsp;Cara C. Lewis PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.focus.2024.100283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Social health is increasingly a focus of healthcare systems. Representative and intersectional analyses of individuals’ social risks such as food, housing, transportation, and financial insecurity and their interest in receiving assistance from the healthcare system (social needs) can provide healthcare organizations with more nuanced estimates that can lead to more effective interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The authors conducted cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of 43,936 Kaiser Permanente members in December 2019–September 2020. Study inclusion was based on membership, age, address, and absence of dementia. Modified Poisson regression models estimated respondents' social risks and needs overall and within domain (food, housing, finances, or transportation) and by intersectional strata on the basis of a combination of age, income, gender, and race and ethnicity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 10,274 participants who completed the survey, 52% reported any social risk, and 32% had any social need. Financial strain was the most prevalent risk (44%), followed by food insecurity (31%), housing instability (17%), and transportation (7%). These intersectional analyses generated 74 intersectional groups. Across the intersectional groups, higher-income (&gt;$50,000 per year) or older-age (&gt;60 years) adults consistently had lower risk and need. However, this pattern varied by race and ethnicity. In particular, older and lower-income, Pacific Islander, African-American/Black, and multiracial adults had the highest estimates of social risk and need.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Higher risk and need among particular intersectional groups suggest the importance of tailored interventions for social needs. The high aggregate prevalence of social risks and needs suggests that system and policy changes must compliment universal and population-based social health screening and assistance interventions in healthcare organizations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72142,"journal":{"name":"AJPM focus","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJPM focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424001019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Social health is increasingly a focus of healthcare systems. Representative and intersectional analyses of individuals’ social risks such as food, housing, transportation, and financial insecurity and their interest in receiving assistance from the healthcare system (social needs) can provide healthcare organizations with more nuanced estimates that can lead to more effective interventions.

Methods

The authors conducted cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of 43,936 Kaiser Permanente members in December 2019–September 2020. Study inclusion was based on membership, age, address, and absence of dementia. Modified Poisson regression models estimated respondents' social risks and needs overall and within domain (food, housing, finances, or transportation) and by intersectional strata on the basis of a combination of age, income, gender, and race and ethnicity.

Results

Of 10,274 participants who completed the survey, 52% reported any social risk, and 32% had any social need. Financial strain was the most prevalent risk (44%), followed by food insecurity (31%), housing instability (17%), and transportation (7%). These intersectional analyses generated 74 intersectional groups. Across the intersectional groups, higher-income (>$50,000 per year) or older-age (>60 years) adults consistently had lower risk and need. However, this pattern varied by race and ethnicity. In particular, older and lower-income, Pacific Islander, African-American/Black, and multiracial adults had the highest estimates of social risk and need.

Conclusions

Higher risk and need among particular intersectional groups suggest the importance of tailored interventions for social needs. The high aggregate prevalence of social risks and needs suggests that system and policy changes must compliment universal and population-based social health screening and assistance interventions in healthcare organizations.
对美国一个综合医疗系统中具有较大代表性的成年人样本中的社会风险和需求进行交叉分析
导言社会健康日益成为医疗保健系统关注的焦点。对个人的社会风险(如食物、住房、交通和财务不安全)及其接受医疗保健系统援助的兴趣(社会需求)进行代表性和交叉性分析,可以为医疗保健机构提供更细致的估计,从而采取更有效的干预措施。方法作者于 2019 年 12 月至 2020 年 9 月对 43936 名 Kaiser Permanente 会员的代表性样本进行了横截面调查。研究的纳入依据是会员资格、年龄、住址和是否患有痴呆症。修改后的泊松回归模型根据年龄、收入、性别、种族和民族的组合,估算出受访者的总体社会风险和需求,以及各领域(食品、住房、财务或交通)和交叉阶层的社会风险和需求。结果 在完成调查的 10274 名参与者中,52% 报告了任何社会风险,32% 有任何社会需求。经济压力是最普遍的风险(44%),其次是食品不安全(31%)、住房不稳定(17%)和交通(7%)。这些交叉分析产生了 74 个交叉群体。在所有交叉群体中,收入较高(每年 5 万美元)或年龄较大(60 岁)的成年人的风险和需求一直较低。然而,这种模式因种族和民族而异。特别是,年龄较大、收入较低、太平洋岛民、非裔美国人/黑人和多种族成年人的社会风险和需求估计值最高。社会风险和需求的高总体流行率表明,系统和政策的改变必须补充医疗机构中普遍的、基于人群的社会健康检查和援助干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJPM focus
AJPM focus Health, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信