Green on demand? Offtaker preferences for corporate power purchase agreements

IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Sabrina Mili, Elizabeth Côté
{"title":"Green on demand? Offtaker preferences for corporate power purchase agreements","authors":"Sabrina Mili,&nbsp;Elizabeth Côté","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Corporate power purchase agreements (CPPAs) have emerged as an additional instrument for accelerating renewable energy deployment. By facilitating the financing of projects, CPPAs offer numerous benefits to power producers and corporate offtakers. However, despite their growing popularity, risk allocation among these counterparties remains challenging. This study investigates risk perceptions and preferences for CPPA design based on insights from 91 corporate offtakers who made 860 hypothetical green-power-procurement decisions in the Swiss context. Our results show a strong interest in CPPAs with lower prices and shorter tenors. The latter is especially important for SMEs, who would be willing to pay considerably more for a five-year contract than a longer one. While large companies would pay hefty premiums for local power production, SMEs impute more importance to the type of technology. However, long-term commitments and the complexity of contractual obligations are major drawbacks. While our findings show that CPPAs have the potential to play an important role in complementing public support for renewables, they also point to the need to implement framework conditions that contribute to lowering risks and complexity for counterparties. Further, they highlight distinctive preferences within this consumer segment, which could inform CPPA negotiations and foster mutually beneficial agreements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 114408"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524004282","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corporate power purchase agreements (CPPAs) have emerged as an additional instrument for accelerating renewable energy deployment. By facilitating the financing of projects, CPPAs offer numerous benefits to power producers and corporate offtakers. However, despite their growing popularity, risk allocation among these counterparties remains challenging. This study investigates risk perceptions and preferences for CPPA design based on insights from 91 corporate offtakers who made 860 hypothetical green-power-procurement decisions in the Swiss context. Our results show a strong interest in CPPAs with lower prices and shorter tenors. The latter is especially important for SMEs, who would be willing to pay considerably more for a five-year contract than a longer one. While large companies would pay hefty premiums for local power production, SMEs impute more importance to the type of technology. However, long-term commitments and the complexity of contractual obligations are major drawbacks. While our findings show that CPPAs have the potential to play an important role in complementing public support for renewables, they also point to the need to implement framework conditions that contribute to lowering risks and complexity for counterparties. Further, they highlight distinctive preferences within this consumer segment, which could inform CPPA negotiations and foster mutually beneficial agreements.
绿色需求?企业购电协议的承购方偏好
企业购电协议(CPPA)已成为加快可再生能源部署的又一工具。通过促进项目融资,企业购电协议为电力生产商和企业承购商带来了诸多好处。然而,尽管它们越来越受欢迎,这些交易方之间的风险分配仍然具有挑战性。在瑞士,91 家企业承购方做出了 860 项假设的绿色电力采购决策,本研究根据这些企业承购方的意见,调查了他们对 CPPA 设计的风险认知和偏好。我们的研究结果表明,企业对价格较低、期限较短的 CPPA 非常感兴趣。后者对中小型企业尤为重要,因为与较长的合同相比,中小型企业愿意为五年期合同支付更多的费用。大公司愿意为本地发电支付高额溢价,而中小企业则更看重技术类型。然而,长期承诺和合同义务的复杂性是主要缺点。虽然我们的研究结果表明,《清洁生产者协议》有可能在补充可再生能源的公共支持方面发挥重要作用,但同时也指出,有必要实施有助于降低交易方风险和复杂性的框架条件。此外,我们还强调了这一消费群体的独特偏好,这可以为 CPPA 谈判提供参考,并促进互利协议的达成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信