Enlarged scars: The effects of economic policy uncertainty on electricity accessibility and urban-rural disparity

IF 3.8 3区 经济学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Congyu Zhao , Xuan Zhai , Miaomiao Tao , Shuai Che
{"title":"Enlarged scars: The effects of economic policy uncertainty on electricity accessibility and urban-rural disparity","authors":"Congyu Zhao ,&nbsp;Xuan Zhai ,&nbsp;Miaomiao Tao ,&nbsp;Shuai Che","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2024.101852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using a comprehensive dataset spanning 22 countries from 2000 to 2020, this study investigates the influence of economic policy uncertainty on electricity accessibility and the urban-rural gap in accessibility, employing a fixed-effect model. Our research provides several new contributions to the existing body of knowledge. First, heightened economic policy uncertainty is linked to reduced electricity access in both urban and rural areas, and it also correlates with an increase in the disparity between these regions. Second, the relationship between economic policy uncertainty and electricity access is not uniform across different levels of accessibility. Specifically, a negative relationship is evident when accessibility is low, but this effect becomes insignificant when access levels surpass the median (50th quantile). While the positive association between economic policy uncertainty and the urban-rural gap is present, it does not intensify as the disparity widens. Third, a mechanism analysis reveals that policy uncertainty contributes to government corruption, further hindering electricity access and deepening regional inequalities. The analysis also highlights how economic policy uncertainty can exacerbate corruption, compounding access issues. Finally, green finance emerges as a mitigating factor, alleviating some of the adverse effects of policy uncertainty. These results provide a deeper understanding of the intricate dynamics at play and suggest that carefully crafted policies can help offset the negative consequences of economic policy uncertainty.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 101852"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178724001462","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using a comprehensive dataset spanning 22 countries from 2000 to 2020, this study investigates the influence of economic policy uncertainty on electricity accessibility and the urban-rural gap in accessibility, employing a fixed-effect model. Our research provides several new contributions to the existing body of knowledge. First, heightened economic policy uncertainty is linked to reduced electricity access in both urban and rural areas, and it also correlates with an increase in the disparity between these regions. Second, the relationship between economic policy uncertainty and electricity access is not uniform across different levels of accessibility. Specifically, a negative relationship is evident when accessibility is low, but this effect becomes insignificant when access levels surpass the median (50th quantile). While the positive association between economic policy uncertainty and the urban-rural gap is present, it does not intensify as the disparity widens. Third, a mechanism analysis reveals that policy uncertainty contributes to government corruption, further hindering electricity access and deepening regional inequalities. The analysis also highlights how economic policy uncertainty can exacerbate corruption, compounding access issues. Finally, green finance emerges as a mitigating factor, alleviating some of the adverse effects of policy uncertainty. These results provide a deeper understanding of the intricate dynamics at play and suggest that carefully crafted policies can help offset the negative consequences of economic policy uncertainty.
扩大的伤疤经济政策的不确定性对电力可及性和城乡差别的影响
本研究利用 2000 年至 2020 年横跨 22 个国家的综合数据集,采用固定效应模型研究了经济政策不确定性对电力可及性和可及性城乡差距的影响。我们的研究为现有知识体系做出了多项新贡献。首先,经济政策不确定性的增加与城市和农村地区电力可及性的降低有关,也与这些地区之间差距的扩大有关。其次,经济政策不确定性与用电普及率之间的关系在不同的用电普及率水平上并不一致。具体而言,当可获得性较低时,两者之间明显存在负相关关系,但当可获得性超过中位数(50 分位数)时,这种影响就变得不明显了。虽然经济政策的不确定性与城乡差距之间存在正相关关系,但并没有随着差距的扩大而加剧。第三,机制分析表明,政策的不确定性助长了政府腐败,进一步阻碍了电力的普及,加深了地区间的不平等。分析还强调了经济政策的不确定性如何加剧腐败,使电力获取问题更加复杂。最后,绿色金融成为一个缓解因素,减轻了政策不确定性的一些不利影响。这些结果加深了人们对错综复杂的动态变化的理解,并表明精心制定的政策有助于抵消经济政策不确定性的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Utilities Policy
Utilities Policy ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services. Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信