Towards accurate dose assessment for emergency industrial radiography source retrieval operations: A preliminary study of 4D Monte Carlo dose calculations
Sungho Moon , Haegin Han , Chansoo Choi , Bangho Shin , Gahee Son , Hyeonil Kim , Suhyeon Kim , Jaehyo Kim , In Gyu Yoon , Kyung Hwan Lee , Chan Hyeong Kim
{"title":"Towards accurate dose assessment for emergency industrial radiography source retrieval operations: A preliminary study of 4D Monte Carlo dose calculations","authors":"Sungho Moon , Haegin Han , Chansoo Choi , Bangho Shin , Gahee Son , Hyeonil Kim , Suhyeon Kim , Jaehyo Kim , In Gyu Yoon , Kyung Hwan Lee , Chan Hyeong Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.net.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The exposure devices utilizing high-activity gamma radiation sources for industrial radiography frequently encounter issues such as stuck or disconnected sources, posing a substantial risk of radiation exposure to the workers executing emergency source retrieval operations, emphasizing the importance of accurate dose assessment. In the present study, the radiation dose to the main worker during the process of source retrieval was calculated and compared for five emergency source retrieval procedures to retrieve stuck or disconnected sources, using 4D Monte Carlo dose calculation and a mesh-type reference computational phantom. For a stuck source, the dose values of the two source retrieval procedures (i.e., repair and cut methods) were found to be relatively small, which indicates that the worker might select either method based on personal preference or situational convenience. Conversely, for a disconnected source, the dose values of the three source retrieval procedures (i.e., fishing, connect/push, and hot stick methods) were much larger and show significant differences. Notably, the fishing method was associated with the lowest dose, whereas the hot stick method resulted in significantly higher doses, differences being as large as ∼5 times. These results underscore the fishing method as a preferable option, particularly over the hot stick method.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19272,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Engineering and Technology","volume":"56 12","pages":"Pages 5428-5436"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573324004480","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The exposure devices utilizing high-activity gamma radiation sources for industrial radiography frequently encounter issues such as stuck or disconnected sources, posing a substantial risk of radiation exposure to the workers executing emergency source retrieval operations, emphasizing the importance of accurate dose assessment. In the present study, the radiation dose to the main worker during the process of source retrieval was calculated and compared for five emergency source retrieval procedures to retrieve stuck or disconnected sources, using 4D Monte Carlo dose calculation and a mesh-type reference computational phantom. For a stuck source, the dose values of the two source retrieval procedures (i.e., repair and cut methods) were found to be relatively small, which indicates that the worker might select either method based on personal preference or situational convenience. Conversely, for a disconnected source, the dose values of the three source retrieval procedures (i.e., fishing, connect/push, and hot stick methods) were much larger and show significant differences. Notably, the fishing method was associated with the lowest dose, whereas the hot stick method resulted in significantly higher doses, differences being as large as ∼5 times. These results underscore the fishing method as a preferable option, particularly over the hot stick method.
期刊介绍:
Nuclear Engineering and Technology (NET), an international journal of the Korean Nuclear Society (KNS), publishes peer-reviewed papers on original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear science and technology. NET bimonthly publishes original articles, reviews, and technical notes. The journal is listed in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) of Thomson Reuters.
NET covers all fields for peaceful utilization of nuclear energy and radiation as follows:
1) Reactor Physics
2) Thermal Hydraulics
3) Nuclear Safety
4) Nuclear I&C
5) Nuclear Physics, Fusion, and Laser Technology
6) Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Radioactive Waste Management
7) Nuclear Fuel and Reactor Materials
8) Radiation Application
9) Radiation Protection
10) Nuclear Structural Analysis and Plant Management & Maintenance
11) Nuclear Policy, Economics, and Human Resource Development