Comparison of traditional and ambient air-assisted ground source heat pump systems using different bore field configurations

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Santeri Siren , Janne Hirvonen , Piia Sormunen
{"title":"Comparison of traditional and ambient air-assisted ground source heat pump systems using different bore field configurations","authors":"Santeri Siren ,&nbsp;Janne Hirvonen ,&nbsp;Piia Sormunen","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While ground source heat pump systems offer an energy-efficient means of generating local renewable energy for buildings, they also face challenges, such as ground thermal imbalance and the spatial requirements of the bore field. These problems can be addressed by optimizing the bore field configuration and coupling the system with complementary energy sources. This study explores the relationship between the bore field configuration and the long-term performance of an ambient air-assisted hybrid ground source heat pump system. The hypothesis was that utilizing ambient air as a supplementary heat source effectively reduces the significance of the bore field configuration on the techno-economic performance of the system. Understanding this relationship can aid in designing more efficient systems. This paper presents quantitative effects of bore field layout and borehole spacing on the performance of AAA-GSHP systems, using several different performance metrics. The analysis encompassed various bore field configurations assessed for a traditional and an ambient air-assisted ground source heat pump system using dynamic energy simulations for a 50-year period with IDA ICE software. A key finding was that utilizing ambient air as an additional heat source highly effectively mitigates the effects of the bore field layout and spacing on the techno-economic performance of the system. By decreasing borehole spacing from 15 m to 5 m, the required land area was reduced by 89 % while simultaneously achieving a 25 % higher share of renewable energy production compared to the traditional solution. Depending on the bore field configuration, the ambient air-assisted system achieved a 0–31 % lower levelized cost of energy, 2–52 % lower CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, and a 9–58 % higher share of renewable energy production compared to the traditional system. The achieved benefits were particularly substantial with configurations where numerous boreholes were concentrated in a small land area. On average, 40 % of the thermal energy from the ambient air was charged in the bore field, while the remaining portion was utilized directly in the evaporator. The conversion of a traditional system to an ambient air-assisted system can be achieved with a technically straightforward solution that leverages existing technology, increasing the initial investment by only 6 %. The ambient air-assisted ground source heat pump system shows significant potential for applications with a year-round heating demand and limited land area for bore hole installation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"323 ","pages":"Article 119240"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890424011816","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While ground source heat pump systems offer an energy-efficient means of generating local renewable energy for buildings, they also face challenges, such as ground thermal imbalance and the spatial requirements of the bore field. These problems can be addressed by optimizing the bore field configuration and coupling the system with complementary energy sources. This study explores the relationship between the bore field configuration and the long-term performance of an ambient air-assisted hybrid ground source heat pump system. The hypothesis was that utilizing ambient air as a supplementary heat source effectively reduces the significance of the bore field configuration on the techno-economic performance of the system. Understanding this relationship can aid in designing more efficient systems. This paper presents quantitative effects of bore field layout and borehole spacing on the performance of AAA-GSHP systems, using several different performance metrics. The analysis encompassed various bore field configurations assessed for a traditional and an ambient air-assisted ground source heat pump system using dynamic energy simulations for a 50-year period with IDA ICE software. A key finding was that utilizing ambient air as an additional heat source highly effectively mitigates the effects of the bore field layout and spacing on the techno-economic performance of the system. By decreasing borehole spacing from 15 m to 5 m, the required land area was reduced by 89 % while simultaneously achieving a 25 % higher share of renewable energy production compared to the traditional solution. Depending on the bore field configuration, the ambient air-assisted system achieved a 0–31 % lower levelized cost of energy, 2–52 % lower CO2 emissions, and a 9–58 % higher share of renewable energy production compared to the traditional system. The achieved benefits were particularly substantial with configurations where numerous boreholes were concentrated in a small land area. On average, 40 % of the thermal energy from the ambient air was charged in the bore field, while the remaining portion was utilized directly in the evaporator. The conversion of a traditional system to an ambient air-assisted system can be achieved with a technically straightforward solution that leverages existing technology, increasing the initial investment by only 6 %. The ambient air-assisted ground source heat pump system shows significant potential for applications with a year-round heating demand and limited land area for bore hole installation.
使用不同孔场配置的传统地源热泵系统与环境空气辅助地源热泵系统的比较
虽然地源热泵系统为建筑物提供了一种产生本地可再生能源的高能效手段,但也面临着一些挑战,例如地热不平衡和钻孔场的空间要求。这些问题可以通过优化孔场配置以及将系统与互补能源耦合来解决。本研究探讨了孔场配置与环境空气辅助混合地源热泵系统长期性能之间的关系。假设是,利用环境空气作为补充热源可有效降低孔场配置对系统技术经济性能的影响。了解这种关系有助于设计更高效的系统。本文利用几个不同的性能指标,介绍了钻孔布局和钻孔间距对 AAA-GSHP 系统性能的定量影响。该分析包括对传统地源热泵系统和环境空气辅助地源热泵系统的各种钻孔配置进行评估,并使用 IDA ICE 软件进行了 50 年的动态能源模拟。一个重要发现是,利用环境空气作为额外热源,可有效减轻钻孔布局和间距对系统技术经济性能的影响。通过将钻孔间距从 15 米减小到 5 米,所需土地面积减少了 89%,同时与传统解决方案相比,可再生能源生产比例提高了 25%。与传统系统相比,环境空气辅助系统的平准化能源成本降低了 0-31%,二氧化碳排放量减少了 2-52%,可再生能源生产比例提高了 9-58%。在众多钻孔集中在一小块土地上的情况下,所取得的效益尤其显著。平均而言,环境空气中 40% 的热能被充入钻孔区域,其余部分直接用于蒸发器。将传统系统转换为环境空气辅助系统在技术上非常简单,只需利用现有技术,初始投资仅增加 6%。环境空气辅助地源热泵系统在全年供热需求和钻孔安装占地面积有限的应用中显示出巨大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信