Comparison of Hospital Stay After Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair With or Without Enhanced Recovery Protocol

IF 1.4 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Ilaria Peluttiero , Dimitrios Apostolou , Gianfranco Varetto , Lorenzo Gibello , Erica Mariani , Edoardo Frola , Fabio Barili , Matteo Ripepi , Massimo Maione , Fabio Verzini
{"title":"Comparison of Hospital Stay After Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair With or Without Enhanced Recovery Protocol","authors":"Ilaria Peluttiero ,&nbsp;Dimitrios Apostolou ,&nbsp;Gianfranco Varetto ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Gibello ,&nbsp;Erica Mariani ,&nbsp;Edoardo Frola ,&nbsp;Fabio Barili ,&nbsp;Matteo Ripepi ,&nbsp;Massimo Maione ,&nbsp;Fabio Verzini","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a protocol of evidence based practices applied in major surgery. Open aortic aneurysm repair is major surgery in terms of complications and mortality. This study aimed to compare early outcomes of ERAS with a traditional post-operative protocol in patients undergoing elective open aortic surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2018 – 2022 in two tertiary vascular surgery centres. The ERAS program was routinely implemented in one centre, while the other one used a standard peri-operative protocol. The primary outcome was post-operative length of stay (pLOS). Secondary outcomes were 30 day mortality rate, complications, re-interventions, and re-hospitalisations. Propensity score weighting was used to balance the two groups by comorbidities. Inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW) was used to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated patients.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 198 patients were enrolled: 128 in the ERAS group (EG) and 70 in the standard group (SG). Mean age was 70.8 ± 6.7 years in EG and 71.1 ± 6.7 in SG (<em>p</em> = 0.39). No significant differences were observed in pre-operative cardiovascular risk factors. The median pLOS was 5 days (IQR 3, 6) in the EG group and 8 days (IQR 6, 11) in the SG group (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). No differences in terms of mortality, re-operations, and re-hospitalisations were observed. The IPTW analyses showed a 40% reduction in pLOS and a significant reduction in major complications in EG (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26–0.66; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). A 45% increase in pLOS in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was found in both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Enhanced recovery after surgery is safe and feasible for elective open aortic surgery and is associated with earlier hospital discharge without differences in terms of mortality and lower complication rates compared with a standard protocol. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a major risk factor for an increase in pLOS. The ERAS protocol is promising in terms of resource utilisation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36502,"journal":{"name":"EJVES Vascular Forum","volume":"62 ","pages":"Pages 97-103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJVES Vascular Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666688X24001497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a protocol of evidence based practices applied in major surgery. Open aortic aneurysm repair is major surgery in terms of complications and mortality. This study aimed to compare early outcomes of ERAS with a traditional post-operative protocol in patients undergoing elective open aortic surgery.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2018 – 2022 in two tertiary vascular surgery centres. The ERAS program was routinely implemented in one centre, while the other one used a standard peri-operative protocol. The primary outcome was post-operative length of stay (pLOS). Secondary outcomes were 30 day mortality rate, complications, re-interventions, and re-hospitalisations. Propensity score weighting was used to balance the two groups by comorbidities. Inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW) was used to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated patients.

Results

A total of 198 patients were enrolled: 128 in the ERAS group (EG) and 70 in the standard group (SG). Mean age was 70.8 ± 6.7 years in EG and 71.1 ± 6.7 in SG (p = 0.39). No significant differences were observed in pre-operative cardiovascular risk factors. The median pLOS was 5 days (IQR 3, 6) in the EG group and 8 days (IQR 6, 11) in the SG group (p < 0.001). No differences in terms of mortality, re-operations, and re-hospitalisations were observed. The IPTW analyses showed a 40% reduction in pLOS and a significant reduction in major complications in EG (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26–0.66; p < 0.001). A 45% increase in pLOS in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was found in both groups.

Conclusion

Enhanced recovery after surgery is safe and feasible for elective open aortic surgery and is associated with earlier hospital discharge without differences in terms of mortality and lower complication rates compared with a standard protocol. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a major risk factor for an increase in pLOS. The ERAS protocol is promising in terms of resource utilisation.
采用或不采用增强恢复方案进行开放式腹主动脉瘤修复术后住院时间的比较
目的术后强化恢复(ERAS)是一项应用于大手术的循证实践方案。就并发症和死亡率而言,开腹主动脉瘤修补术是一项重大手术。本研究旨在比较ERAS与传统术后方案对择期接受开放式主动脉手术患者的早期疗效。方法这项回顾性队列研究于2018-2022年间在两家三级血管外科中心进行。其中一个中心常规实施ERAS计划,而另一个中心则采用标准围手术期方案。主要结果是术后住院时间(pLOS)。次要结果是 30 天死亡率、并发症、再次介入治疗和再次住院。采用倾向评分加权法来平衡两组患者的合并症。采用治疗权重逆概率(IPTW)估算治疗患者的平均治疗效果:ERAS组(EG)128人,标准组(SG)70人。EG 组的平均年龄为(70.8 ± 6.7)岁,SG 组为(71.1 ± 6.7)岁(P = 0.39)。术前心血管风险因素无明显差异。EG 组的中位 pLOS 为 5 天(IQR 3,6),SG 组为 8 天(IQR 6,11)(p < 0.001)。在死亡率、再次手术和再次住院方面没有观察到差异。IPTW 分析显示,EG 组的 pLOS 减少了 40%,主要并发症显著减少(OR 0.41,95% CI 0.26-0.66; p <0.001)。结论对于择期开放式主动脉手术而言,术后加强恢复是安全可行的,与标准方案相比,术后加强恢复可使患者更早出院,但在死亡率和并发症发生率方面并无差异。慢性阻塞性肺病是导致 pLOS 增加的主要风险因素。ERAS方案在资源利用方面很有前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EJVES Vascular Forum
EJVES Vascular Forum Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
102 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信