Establishing greenhouse gas emission benchmarks for the asphalt industry – Are short-term reduction targets feasible using current practice or are more extensive measures needed?

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Ben Moins , David Hernando , Dieter Seghers , Wim Van den bergh , Amaryllis Audenaert
{"title":"Establishing greenhouse gas emission benchmarks for the asphalt industry – Are short-term reduction targets feasible using current practice or are more extensive measures needed?","authors":"Ben Moins ,&nbsp;David Hernando ,&nbsp;Dieter Seghers ,&nbsp;Wim Van den bergh ,&nbsp;Amaryllis Audenaert","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective of this study was to calculate cradle-to-gate benchmarks for the embodied greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of asphalt mixtures. Reference (median), target (10<sup>th</sup> percentile), and limit (80<sup>th</sup> percentile) benchmarks were calculated for nine mixture types using 606 mixtures. The following ranges for the specific benchmarks in terms of CO<sub>2</sub>-eq per ton were obtained: 41.2 to 66.7 (references), 31.2 to 52.9 (targets), and 44.8 to 75.3 (limits). It was found that the yearly embodied emissions could be reduced by 23.7 % by aiming for the targets, which is just below the 25 % reduction goal set in Belgium. However, these savings could be further increased to 29.3 % considering consistent implementation of the most used best available technologies. Moreover, if the lowest 10<sup>th</sup> percentile of this scenario was targeted, an ambitious reduction potential of 39.2 % was obtained. Consequently, a combination of more extreme mitigation strategies is required to achieve carbon neutrality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107994"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924005858","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to calculate cradle-to-gate benchmarks for the embodied greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of asphalt mixtures. Reference (median), target (10th percentile), and limit (80th percentile) benchmarks were calculated for nine mixture types using 606 mixtures. The following ranges for the specific benchmarks in terms of CO2-eq per ton were obtained: 41.2 to 66.7 (references), 31.2 to 52.9 (targets), and 44.8 to 75.3 (limits). It was found that the yearly embodied emissions could be reduced by 23.7 % by aiming for the targets, which is just below the 25 % reduction goal set in Belgium. However, these savings could be further increased to 29.3 % considering consistent implementation of the most used best available technologies. Moreover, if the lowest 10th percentile of this scenario was targeted, an ambitious reduction potential of 39.2 % was obtained. Consequently, a combination of more extreme mitigation strategies is required to achieve carbon neutrality.

Abstract Image

为沥青行业制定温室气体排放基准 - 短期减排目标是否可行,是采用现行做法,还是需要采取更广泛的措施?
本研究旨在计算沥青混合料从摇篮到终点的温室气体(GHG)排放基准。使用 606 种混合料计算了九种混合料类型的参考(中位数)、目标(第 10 个百分位数)和极限(第 80 个百分位数)基准。以每吨二氧化碳当量计算的具体基准范围如下:41.2 至 66.7(参考值)、31.2 至 52.9(目标值)和 44.8 至 75.3(限值)。研究发现,通过实现目标,每年可减少 23.7% 的体现排放量,略低于比利时设定的 25% 的减排目标。然而,考虑到持续采用最常用的最佳可得技术,这些减排量可进一步提高到 29.3%。此外,如果以该方案中最低的 10%为目标,则可实现 39.2%的减排潜力。因此,要实现碳中和,需要结合更极端的减排战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信