Conceptual framework for considering animal welfare in sustainability assessments of foods

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Sebastian Richter , Laura Scherer , Margaret Hegwood , Harriet Bartlett , Leonie N. Bossert , Anita Frehner , Christian Schader
{"title":"Conceptual framework for considering animal welfare in sustainability assessments of foods","authors":"Sebastian Richter ,&nbsp;Laura Scherer ,&nbsp;Margaret Hegwood ,&nbsp;Harriet Bartlett ,&nbsp;Leonie N. Bossert ,&nbsp;Anita Frehner ,&nbsp;Christian Schader","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, many studies analyzed the environmental, health and economic implications of the production and consumption of different foods – and, on this basis, evaluated their sustainability. However, associated impacts on animals have remained largely unexamined and existing assessment approaches are still immature and often lack reflection on their normative assumptions and resulting implications. As animal welfare concerns increase, this represents a shortcoming, leaving a critical sustainability issue without due consideration. To address this, we develop a conceptual framework that guides the key decisions for assessing animal welfare impacts of foods. The framework is derived from an integrative literature review and revised following external feedback from expert focus groups. It bridges the research fields of food system modeling, animal welfare science and animal ethics and can guide researchers in developing assessment approaches and assessing animal welfare impacts of foods, from individual food items to whole diets. The framework also directs transparent communication of the most important assessment decisions. We outline key considerations for animal welfare assessments of foods, highlight associated challenges and discuss quality criteria as well as technical and normative strategies to address them. Our contribution provides a basis for future research to integrate animal welfare into sustainability evaluations of food and investigate tradeoffs and synergies with environmental, social or economic issues. Following this framework in future assessments facilitates the integration of animal welfare into food-related policy assessments and public decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"52 ","pages":"Pages 179-209"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550924002902","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, many studies analyzed the environmental, health and economic implications of the production and consumption of different foods – and, on this basis, evaluated their sustainability. However, associated impacts on animals have remained largely unexamined and existing assessment approaches are still immature and often lack reflection on their normative assumptions and resulting implications. As animal welfare concerns increase, this represents a shortcoming, leaving a critical sustainability issue without due consideration. To address this, we develop a conceptual framework that guides the key decisions for assessing animal welfare impacts of foods. The framework is derived from an integrative literature review and revised following external feedback from expert focus groups. It bridges the research fields of food system modeling, animal welfare science and animal ethics and can guide researchers in developing assessment approaches and assessing animal welfare impacts of foods, from individual food items to whole diets. The framework also directs transparent communication of the most important assessment decisions. We outline key considerations for animal welfare assessments of foods, highlight associated challenges and discuss quality criteria as well as technical and normative strategies to address them. Our contribution provides a basis for future research to integrate animal welfare into sustainability evaluations of food and investigate tradeoffs and synergies with environmental, social or economic issues. Following this framework in future assessments facilitates the integration of animal welfare into food-related policy assessments and public decisions.
在食品可持续性评估中考虑动物福利的概念框架
近年来,许多研究分析了不同食品的生产和消费对环境、健康和经济的影响,并在此基础上评估了其可持续性。然而,对动物的相关影响在很大程度上仍未得到研究,而且现有的评估方法仍不成熟,往往缺乏对其规范性假设和由此产生的影响的反思。随着对动物福利的关注与日俱增,这是一个缺陷,使一个关键的可持续性问题没有得到应有的考虑。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了一个概念框架,用于指导评估食品对动物福利影响的关键决策。该框架源自综合文献综述,并根据专家焦点小组的外部反馈进行了修订。它连接了食品系统建模、动物福利科学和动物伦理学等研究领域,可指导研究人员制定评估方法,评估食品(从单个食品到整个膳食)对动物福利的影响。该框架还能指导对最重要的评估决策进行透明的沟通。我们概述了食品动物福利评估的主要考虑因素,强调了相关挑战,并讨论了质量标准以及应对这些挑战的技术和规范策略。我们的贡献为今后的研究奠定了基础,以便将动物福利纳入食品可持续性评估,并研究与环境、社会或经济问题之间的权衡和协同作用。在未来的评估中遵循这一框架有助于将动物福利纳入与食品相关的政策评估和公共决策中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信