Life cycle assessment of the manothermosonication of liquid whole egg: A comparative evaluation with conventional thermal preservation

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Enrique Beitia , Beatriz Q. Silva , Sergiy Smetana , Volker Heinz , Vasilis Valdramidis , Kemal Aganovic
{"title":"Life cycle assessment of the manothermosonication of liquid whole egg: A comparative evaluation with conventional thermal preservation","authors":"Enrique Beitia ,&nbsp;Beatriz Q. Silva ,&nbsp;Sergiy Smetana ,&nbsp;Volker Heinz ,&nbsp;Vasilis Valdramidis ,&nbsp;Kemal Aganovic","doi":"10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Manothermosonication (MTS) is a promising alternative to thermal preservation of liquid whole egg (LWE) in terms of safety level and improved quality. However, energy and sustainability assessment of MTS are not well described. This study compared the energy balance and life cycle assessment (LCA) of MTS to traditional thermal preservation of LWE, considering equivalent microbial inactivation levels and a production capacity of 100 kg/h within a “gate to gate” approach.</div><div>Results of the energy assessment indicated that MTS preservation consumed 15% less energy (2.00 kWh/kg of LWE) and water compared to thermal preservation (2.36 kWh/kg of LWE). This reduction is attributable to cavitation, the mechanism of action in MTS, which eliminates the need of pre-homogenisation stage and water for heating. Concerning the environmental impact, MTS scored lower in all impact indicators, mainly due to reduced electricity and water usage. For instance, carbon footprint of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from LWE processing were 57.3% for MTS and 61.8% for thermal preservation, with the environmental impact of the pasteurisation stage being 4.1-fold lower in MTS. This study suggests MTS preservation of LWE is a viable alternative to thermal methods, offering safety, quality, and improved energy and environmental benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":382,"journal":{"name":"LWT - Food Science and Technology","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 116953"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LWT - Food Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643824012362","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Manothermosonication (MTS) is a promising alternative to thermal preservation of liquid whole egg (LWE) in terms of safety level and improved quality. However, energy and sustainability assessment of MTS are not well described. This study compared the energy balance and life cycle assessment (LCA) of MTS to traditional thermal preservation of LWE, considering equivalent microbial inactivation levels and a production capacity of 100 kg/h within a “gate to gate” approach.
Results of the energy assessment indicated that MTS preservation consumed 15% less energy (2.00 kWh/kg of LWE) and water compared to thermal preservation (2.36 kWh/kg of LWE). This reduction is attributable to cavitation, the mechanism of action in MTS, which eliminates the need of pre-homogenisation stage and water for heating. Concerning the environmental impact, MTS scored lower in all impact indicators, mainly due to reduced electricity and water usage. For instance, carbon footprint of CO2 emissions from LWE processing were 57.3% for MTS and 61.8% for thermal preservation, with the environmental impact of the pasteurisation stage being 4.1-fold lower in MTS. This study suggests MTS preservation of LWE is a viable alternative to thermal methods, offering safety, quality, and improved energy and environmental benefits.
液态全蛋恒温保存的生命周期评估:与传统热保存法的比较评估
就安全水平和质量改进而言,热溶解(MTS)是液态全蛋(LWE)热保存的一种有前途的替代方法。然而,MTS 的能源和可持续发展评估还没有得到很好的描述。本研究比较了 MTS 和传统的液态全蛋热保存法的能量平衡和生命周期评估(LCA),考虑了同等的微生物灭活水平和 "门到门 "方法中 100 公斤/小时的生产能力。能耗降低的原因是 MTS 的作用机制--空化,它消除了预均质化阶段和加热用水的需要。关于对环境的影响,MTS 在所有影响指标上的得分都较低,这主要归功于用电量和用水量的减少。例如,在 LWE 加工过程中排放的二氧化碳中,MTS 的碳足迹为 57.3%,而热保存的碳足迹为 61.8%,其中巴氏杀菌阶段对环境的影响是 MTS 的 4.1 倍。这项研究表明,用 MTS 法保存 LWE 是热法的一种可行替代方法,不仅安全、优质,还能提高能源和环境效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
LWT - Food Science and Technology
LWT - Food Science and Technology 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1724
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: LWT - Food Science and Technology is an international journal that publishes innovative papers in the fields of food chemistry, biochemistry, microbiology, technology and nutrition. The work described should be innovative either in the approach or in the methods used. The significance of the results either for the science community or for the food industry must also be specified. Contributions written in English are welcomed in the form of review articles, short reviews, research papers, and research notes. Papers featuring animal trials and cell cultures are outside the scope of the journal and will not be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信