When differentiated carbon tax policy meets LBD of renewable energy and electrification of energy end-use: Policy implications of sectoral differentiation of carbon productivity and carbon emission

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Bo Shi , Sijia Lin , Minjun Shi
{"title":"When differentiated carbon tax policy meets LBD of renewable energy and electrification of energy end-use: Policy implications of sectoral differentiation of carbon productivity and carbon emission","authors":"Bo Shi ,&nbsp;Sijia Lin ,&nbsp;Minjun Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The impact of environmental policy stringency on energy efficiency innovation has been studied well without considering renewable energy storage and electrification to meet demand for energy structural transition in China. Based on these past studies, this paper introduces the CGE model to analyze carbon tax stringency via carbon productivity by accounting for the electrification and learning-by-doing effect of renewable energy. Through comparing the performance of the uniform and differentiated carbon tax, it is found that the differentiated carbon tax always has a worse environmental performance in reducing carbon emissions due to less energy efficiency improvement than uniform one. While uniform carbon tax at stricter level gains more economic and environmental benefits on sectoral and overall aspects in long term because of greater improvement on sectoral carbon productivity in energy-intensive industries. Furthermore, these findings at a large level reveal the intricate interaction among carbon tax, sectoral carbon productivity, renewables-related subsidy, electrification, and the learning-by-doing of renewables for accelerating the energy structural transition and simultaneously achieving the coordination between economic growth and environmental protection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 107724"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524003111","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impact of environmental policy stringency on energy efficiency innovation has been studied well without considering renewable energy storage and electrification to meet demand for energy structural transition in China. Based on these past studies, this paper introduces the CGE model to analyze carbon tax stringency via carbon productivity by accounting for the electrification and learning-by-doing effect of renewable energy. Through comparing the performance of the uniform and differentiated carbon tax, it is found that the differentiated carbon tax always has a worse environmental performance in reducing carbon emissions due to less energy efficiency improvement than uniform one. While uniform carbon tax at stricter level gains more economic and environmental benefits on sectoral and overall aspects in long term because of greater improvement on sectoral carbon productivity in energy-intensive industries. Furthermore, these findings at a large level reveal the intricate interaction among carbon tax, sectoral carbon productivity, renewables-related subsidy, electrification, and the learning-by-doing of renewables for accelerating the energy structural transition and simultaneously achieving the coordination between economic growth and environmental protection.
当差异化碳税政策满足可再生能源和能源终端使用电气化的低碳发展时:碳生产率和碳排放量的部门差异化对政策的影响
环境政策的严格性对能效创新的影响已经有了很好的研究,但没有考虑可再生能源的储存和电气化以满足中国能源结构转型的需求。本文在上述研究的基础上,引入 CGE 模型,通过碳生产率分析碳税的严格性,并考虑了可再生能源的电气化和边做边学效应。通过比较统一碳税和差别碳税的绩效,发现差别碳税在减少碳排放方面的环境绩效总是比统一碳税差,因为差别碳税对能源效率的提高比统一碳税更少。而更严格的统一碳税由于更大程度地提高了能源密集型产业的部门碳生产率,从长期来看,在部门和整体方面获得了更多的经济和环境效益。此外,这些研究结果在很大程度上揭示了碳税、部门碳生产率、可再生能源相关补贴、电气化以及可再生能源的边做边学之间错综复杂的互动关系,有助于加快能源结构转型,同时实现经济增长与环境保护之间的协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信