Aonghais S.C.P. Cook , Eldina Salkanovic , Elizabeth Masden , Hsiu Eik Lee , Alexander Holm Kiilerich
{"title":"A critical appraisal of 40 years of avian collision risk modelling: How have we got here and where do we go next?","authors":"Aonghais S.C.P. Cook , Eldina Salkanovic , Elizabeth Masden , Hsiu Eik Lee , Alexander Holm Kiilerich","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Collision risk models (CRMs) form a key part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process for wind farms. It is 40 years since the first CRM was published. We take a critical approach to reviewing the CRMs available in the peer-reviewed and grey literature, with a view to better understanding the current challenges, and how these may be overcome. In total, we identified 52 models, which include 75 input parameters amongst them. There has been a tendency for models to become more complex over time, incorporating more input parameters with a view to improving biological realism. However, many of these models have not been applied within the EIA process. Consequently, despite advances in modelling and the types of data available to inform models, few of these advances have been implemented in regulatory processes. As few models have been validated, it would be beneficial to make use of data from any existing or planned post construction monitoring campaigns to do so, where possible. Additionally, we recommend for sensitivity and benchmarking analysis to compare results from established models for any new CRM proposed. As the industry continues to expand, it is important that stakeholders have confidence in any approach used to assess collision risk. This will likely require close collaboration and careful discussion between all stakeholders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 107717"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524003044","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Collision risk models (CRMs) form a key part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process for wind farms. It is 40 years since the first CRM was published. We take a critical approach to reviewing the CRMs available in the peer-reviewed and grey literature, with a view to better understanding the current challenges, and how these may be overcome. In total, we identified 52 models, which include 75 input parameters amongst them. There has been a tendency for models to become more complex over time, incorporating more input parameters with a view to improving biological realism. However, many of these models have not been applied within the EIA process. Consequently, despite advances in modelling and the types of data available to inform models, few of these advances have been implemented in regulatory processes. As few models have been validated, it would be beneficial to make use of data from any existing or planned post construction monitoring campaigns to do so, where possible. Additionally, we recommend for sensitivity and benchmarking analysis to compare results from established models for any new CRM proposed. As the industry continues to expand, it is important that stakeholders have confidence in any approach used to assess collision risk. This will likely require close collaboration and careful discussion between all stakeholders.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.