A systematic framework for rural resilience assessment in the rural Gansu Province, China

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Tianmin Tao , Libang Ma , Ye Liu , Honglin Tang , Xiang Wang , Shanshan Wu
{"title":"A systematic framework for rural resilience assessment in the rural Gansu Province, China","authors":"Tianmin Tao ,&nbsp;Libang Ma ,&nbsp;Ye Liu ,&nbsp;Honglin Tang ,&nbsp;Xiang Wang ,&nbsp;Shanshan Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Against the backdrop of cumulative environmental, economic, and social challenges facing rural areas, there is increasing concern about sustainable rural development. As a transformative approach, conducting scientific assessments of rural resilience and implementing targeted interventions are crucial for achieving sustainable development goals in rural areas of developing countries. This study, using Gansu Province, China, as a case study, establishes a rural resilience assessment framework based on the 5W2H framework. It integrates qualitative understanding with quantitative evaluation to explore the levels of rural resilience in underdeveloped regions and the pathway mechanisms by which obstacles hinder the enhancement of rural resilience. The findings indicate that areas with higher levels of rural resilience tend to have lower obstacle levels, and governmental regulation significantly contributes to spatial equity in rural resilience. Subsequently, the pathway mechanisms obstructing the formation of rural resilience were deduced through mediating effect analysis. In conjunction with the characterization of obstacle degrees, key steps to improve rural resilience are proposed for each dimension within the 5W2H quantitative framework. Through this study, we found that the 5W2H framework addresses the “what, where, why, who, when” questions in rural resilience research, combining qualitative and quantitative analyses to reveal the complexity of rural sustainable development in a more profound manner, which holds promising application prospects. Given the increasingly prominent issues in rural development, it is imperative to re-conceptualize rural areas from the perspective of the 5W2H framework to effectively enhance rural resilience levels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 107715"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524003020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Against the backdrop of cumulative environmental, economic, and social challenges facing rural areas, there is increasing concern about sustainable rural development. As a transformative approach, conducting scientific assessments of rural resilience and implementing targeted interventions are crucial for achieving sustainable development goals in rural areas of developing countries. This study, using Gansu Province, China, as a case study, establishes a rural resilience assessment framework based on the 5W2H framework. It integrates qualitative understanding with quantitative evaluation to explore the levels of rural resilience in underdeveloped regions and the pathway mechanisms by which obstacles hinder the enhancement of rural resilience. The findings indicate that areas with higher levels of rural resilience tend to have lower obstacle levels, and governmental regulation significantly contributes to spatial equity in rural resilience. Subsequently, the pathway mechanisms obstructing the formation of rural resilience were deduced through mediating effect analysis. In conjunction with the characterization of obstacle degrees, key steps to improve rural resilience are proposed for each dimension within the 5W2H quantitative framework. Through this study, we found that the 5W2H framework addresses the “what, where, why, who, when” questions in rural resilience research, combining qualitative and quantitative analyses to reveal the complexity of rural sustainable development in a more profound manner, which holds promising application prospects. Given the increasingly prominent issues in rural development, it is imperative to re-conceptualize rural areas from the perspective of the 5W2H framework to effectively enhance rural resilience levels.
中国甘肃省农村抗灾能力评估系统框架
在农村地区面临环境、经济和社会挑战不断累积的背景下,人们越来越关注农村的可持续发展。作为一种变革性方法,对农村抗灾能力进行科学评估并实施有针对性的干预措施,对于发展中国家农村地区实现可持续发展目标至关重要。本研究以中国甘肃省为例,建立了基于 5W2H 框架的农村抗灾能力评估框架。研究将定性认识与定量评估相结合,探讨了欠发达地区农村韧性的水平,以及阻碍农村韧性提高的路径机制。研究结果表明,农村恢复力水平较高的地区,其障碍水平往往较低,而政府规制则极大地促进了农村恢复力的空间公平。随后,通过中介效应分析,推导出阻碍农村韧性形成的路径机制。结合障碍度的特征,在 5W2H 定量框架内,针对每个维度提出了提高农村韧性的关键步骤。通过本研究,我们发现 5W2H 框架解决了农村韧性研究中 "是什么、在哪里、为什么、谁、何时 "的问题,将定性分析与定量分析相结合,更深刻地揭示了农村可持续发展的复杂性,具有广阔的应用前景。鉴于农村发展中日益突出的问题,从 "5W2H "框架的角度重新认识农村地区,以有效提高农村的抗灾能力水平势在必行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信