Comparison analysis of thermal behavior of Lithium-ion batteries based on a novel multi-modal composite immersion liquid cooling system coupled with fin/micro-heat pipe array

IF 8.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Rongqing Bao , Zhaohui Wang , Haonan Yang , Bowen Zhang , Quanjie Gao , Si Chen
{"title":"Comparison analysis of thermal behavior of Lithium-ion batteries based on a novel multi-modal composite immersion liquid cooling system coupled with fin/micro-heat pipe array","authors":"Rongqing Bao ,&nbsp;Zhaohui Wang ,&nbsp;Haonan Yang ,&nbsp;Bowen Zhang ,&nbsp;Quanjie Gao ,&nbsp;Si Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.est.2024.114379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Immersion liquid cooling technology demonstrates significant potential for rapid heat dissipation from Lithium-ion batteries under extreme discharge conditions. To mitigate the effects of temperature inconsistency and liquid shock on battery life, a novel multi-mode composite immersion cooling (CILC) method is proposed in this study by combining static immersion liquid cooling (SILC) and conventional dynamic immersion liquid cooling (DILC). The cooling performances of both DILC and CILC modules were compared under various conditions. Compared to DILC, the CILC reduced the maximum temperature by 9.48 % and the temperature difference by 78.36 %. Notably, the temperature difference of the CILC remains relatively stable and is less influenced by coolant flow variations. Additionally, the concept of fluctuation effect was introduced to quantify the maximum temperature and temperature difference, enabling a deeper evaluation of the impact of various coolant types on the thermal equalization behavior of both DILC and CILC modules. The results indicate that the thermal equalization rate of DILC is low and experiences significant fluctuations. In contrast, CILC consistently demonstrates efficient and stable thermal equalization behavior. Furthermore, even under various failure scenarios, the CILC system retains its fundamental heat dissipation capabilities, effectively safeguarding the thermal integrity and stability of the module. Overall, the proposed CILC thermal solution outperforms traditional DILC in terms of heat dissipation uniformity, shock protection for battery surfaces, and stable thermal equalization behavior, providing a novel approach for the thermal management of immersed battery systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of energy storage","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 114379"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of energy storage","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X24039653","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immersion liquid cooling technology demonstrates significant potential for rapid heat dissipation from Lithium-ion batteries under extreme discharge conditions. To mitigate the effects of temperature inconsistency and liquid shock on battery life, a novel multi-mode composite immersion cooling (CILC) method is proposed in this study by combining static immersion liquid cooling (SILC) and conventional dynamic immersion liquid cooling (DILC). The cooling performances of both DILC and CILC modules were compared under various conditions. Compared to DILC, the CILC reduced the maximum temperature by 9.48 % and the temperature difference by 78.36 %. Notably, the temperature difference of the CILC remains relatively stable and is less influenced by coolant flow variations. Additionally, the concept of fluctuation effect was introduced to quantify the maximum temperature and temperature difference, enabling a deeper evaluation of the impact of various coolant types on the thermal equalization behavior of both DILC and CILC modules. The results indicate that the thermal equalization rate of DILC is low and experiences significant fluctuations. In contrast, CILC consistently demonstrates efficient and stable thermal equalization behavior. Furthermore, even under various failure scenarios, the CILC system retains its fundamental heat dissipation capabilities, effectively safeguarding the thermal integrity and stability of the module. Overall, the proposed CILC thermal solution outperforms traditional DILC in terms of heat dissipation uniformity, shock protection for battery surfaces, and stable thermal equalization behavior, providing a novel approach for the thermal management of immersed battery systems.
基于鳍片/微热管阵列的新型多模式复合浸入式液体冷却系统的锂离子电池热行为对比分析
浸液冷却技术在极端放电条件下为锂离子电池快速散热方面具有巨大潜力。为了减轻温度不一致和液体冲击对电池寿命的影响,本研究结合静态浸入式液体冷却(SILC)和传统动态浸入式液体冷却(DILC),提出了一种新型多模式复合浸入式冷却(CILC)方法。比较了 DILC 和 CILC 模块在各种条件下的冷却性能。与 DILC 相比,CILC 模块的最高温度降低了 9.48%,温差降低了 78.36%。值得注意的是,CILC 的温差保持相对稳定,受冷却剂流量变化的影响较小。此外,还引入了波动效应的概念来量化最高温度和温差,从而能够更深入地评估各种冷却剂类型对 DILC 和 CILC 模块热平衡行为的影响。结果表明,DILC 的热均衡率较低,且波动较大。相比之下,CILC 始终表现出高效、稳定的热平衡行为。此外,即使在各种故障情况下,CILC 系统仍能保持基本的散热能力,有效保障模块的热完整性和稳定性。总之,所提出的 CILC 热解决方案在散热均匀性、电池表面的防震保护和稳定的热平衡行为等方面都优于传统的 DILC,为浸入式电池系统的热管理提供了一种新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of energy storage
Journal of energy storage Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
24.50%
发文量
2262
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Journal of energy storage focusses on all aspects of energy storage, in particular systems integration, electric grid integration, modelling and analysis, novel energy storage technologies, sizing and management strategies, business models for operation of storage systems and energy storage developments worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信