How do clients experience intensive EMDR for post-traumatic stress? An interpretative phenomenological analysis

IF 2 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Sarah-Jane Butler , Christine Ramsey-Wade
{"title":"How do clients experience intensive EMDR for post-traumatic stress? An interpretative phenomenological analysis","authors":"Sarah-Jane Butler ,&nbsp;Christine Ramsey-Wade","doi":"10.1016/j.ejtd.2024.100479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Several studies of the intensive delivery of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) have indicated it to be an effective treatment for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), providing improved client experience, faster reduction in symptoms, greater symptom reduction, and reduced dropout rates as compared to non-intensive EMDR. However, there is a dearth of studies that describe this non-traditional approach to the delivery of EMDR psychotherapy from the patients’ perspective.</div></div><div><h3>Procedure</h3><div>This qualitative study explores the experiences of patients who undertook intensive EMDR for post-traumatic stress. Interviews were conducted with 10 participants and analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA).</div></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><div>The data revealed two Personal Experiential Themes (PET) and four experiential statements. ‘The importance of psychological safety’ generated sub-themes of ‘A protected space’ and ‘The importance of a continued connection’. ‘The changing self’ generated two sub-themes of a ‘Wow! moment’, and ‘Living the way I always wanted’.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Results show that intensive EMDR can be experienced as safe, facilitating agency and engagement while affecting meaningful change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":"8 4","pages":"Article 100479"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924001029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Several studies of the intensive delivery of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) have indicated it to be an effective treatment for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), providing improved client experience, faster reduction in symptoms, greater symptom reduction, and reduced dropout rates as compared to non-intensive EMDR. However, there is a dearth of studies that describe this non-traditional approach to the delivery of EMDR psychotherapy from the patients’ perspective.

Procedure

This qualitative study explores the experiences of patients who undertook intensive EMDR for post-traumatic stress. Interviews were conducted with 10 participants and analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA).

Main findings

The data revealed two Personal Experiential Themes (PET) and four experiential statements. ‘The importance of psychological safety’ generated sub-themes of ‘A protected space’ and ‘The importance of a continued connection’. ‘The changing self’ generated two sub-themes of a ‘Wow! moment’, and ‘Living the way I always wanted’.

Conclusion

Results show that intensive EMDR can be experienced as safe, facilitating agency and engagement while affecting meaningful change.
客户如何体验针对创伤后应激反应的强化 EMDR?解释现象学分析
背景多项关于眼动脱敏与再处理(EMDR)强化治疗的研究表明,EMDR是治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的有效方法,与非强化EMDR相比,EMDR能改善患者体验、更快地减轻症状、更大程度地减轻症状以及降低辍学率。本定性研究探讨了接受强化EMDR治疗创伤后应激障碍的患者的经历。研究对 10 名参与者进行了访谈,并采用解释性现象学分析法(IPA)对访谈结果进行了分析。心理安全的重要性 "产生了 "受保护的空间 "和 "持续联系的重要性 "两个次主题。改变中的自我 "产生了 "哇!的时刻 "和 "以我一直想要的方式生活 "两个次主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信