A prospective cost analysis model for financial impact of Connected Care interventions on hospitals’ budget

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Jedidja Lok-Visser , Jobbe P.L. Leenen , Heleen M. den Hertog , Gina van Vemde , Jeroen Rekveldt , Jan W.K. van den Berg , Gijs A. Patijn , Judith R. Cornelisse-Vermaat , Gréanne Leeftink , Jan Gerard Maring
{"title":"A prospective cost analysis model for financial impact of Connected Care interventions on hospitals’ budget","authors":"Jedidja Lok-Visser ,&nbsp;Jobbe P.L. Leenen ,&nbsp;Heleen M. den Hertog ,&nbsp;Gina van Vemde ,&nbsp;Jeroen Rekveldt ,&nbsp;Jan W.K. van den Berg ,&nbsp;Gijs A. Patijn ,&nbsp;Judith R. Cornelisse-Vermaat ,&nbsp;Gréanne Leeftink ,&nbsp;Jan Gerard Maring","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To present a prospective cost analysis (PCA) model for estimating the financial impact of Connected Care interventions in hospitals to support managerial decision-making, and describe its application to three different care pathways.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Input of the developed PCA model consisted of standard of care input and intervention-specific input. The output of the model included: capacity benefits, costs, and reimbursements. The model was applied to three types of interventions in a large Dutch teaching hospital: 1) home telemonitoring for chronic patients (case (COPD), 2) remote aftercare for patients with acute illnesses (case: stroke), and 3) parenteral medication administration at home (case: prosthetic hip or knee joint infections).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Output of the PCA model showed that the cost savings can exceed the intervention costs if an intervention decreases the length of stay of patients. For COPD telemonitoring 10.1 % of the healthcare utilization should be reduced to reach break-even, and for antibiotic treatment at home break-even is reached if 4.6 % of the length of stay is reduced. The cost savings of remote aftercare for stroke patients is focused on reducing outpatient visits, and in the current Dutch reimbursement system this does not completely cover the costs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The PCA model is an easy to implement and useful tool for assessing the financial impact of CC interventions from a hospital perspective. It supports decision makers to prospectively assess the cost and capacity benefits of interventions and to inform decisions on implementation. Further studies are needed to extend the model across the entire healthcare continuum.</div></div><div><h3>Public interest summary</h3><div>We present a prospective cost analysis (PCA) model for estimating the financial impact of Connected Care interventions in hospitals to support managerial decision-making. Connected Care interventions are based on an integrated care approach utilizing digital health technologies to enhance patient-centred, collaborative care, where patients receive care at home. Examples are telemonitoring of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, remote aftercare for stroke patients and infusion treatment at home for orthopaedic patients with an infection. These interventions have additional costs, but also save part of the costs of the conventional care, and have benefits in terms of a decrease in outpatient visits or hospitalizations. We provide a model where a hospital can calculate the impact in costs and benefits of Connected Care interventions and test this on these three examples. We show that the cost savings are able to exceed the intervention costs if an intervention has impact on the hospitalization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 6","pages":"Article 100926"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000893","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To present a prospective cost analysis (PCA) model for estimating the financial impact of Connected Care interventions in hospitals to support managerial decision-making, and describe its application to three different care pathways.

Methods

Input of the developed PCA model consisted of standard of care input and intervention-specific input. The output of the model included: capacity benefits, costs, and reimbursements. The model was applied to three types of interventions in a large Dutch teaching hospital: 1) home telemonitoring for chronic patients (case (COPD), 2) remote aftercare for patients with acute illnesses (case: stroke), and 3) parenteral medication administration at home (case: prosthetic hip or knee joint infections).

Results

Output of the PCA model showed that the cost savings can exceed the intervention costs if an intervention decreases the length of stay of patients. For COPD telemonitoring 10.1 % of the healthcare utilization should be reduced to reach break-even, and for antibiotic treatment at home break-even is reached if 4.6 % of the length of stay is reduced. The cost savings of remote aftercare for stroke patients is focused on reducing outpatient visits, and in the current Dutch reimbursement system this does not completely cover the costs.

Conclusions

The PCA model is an easy to implement and useful tool for assessing the financial impact of CC interventions from a hospital perspective. It supports decision makers to prospectively assess the cost and capacity benefits of interventions and to inform decisions on implementation. Further studies are needed to extend the model across the entire healthcare continuum.

Public interest summary

We present a prospective cost analysis (PCA) model for estimating the financial impact of Connected Care interventions in hospitals to support managerial decision-making. Connected Care interventions are based on an integrated care approach utilizing digital health technologies to enhance patient-centred, collaborative care, where patients receive care at home. Examples are telemonitoring of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, remote aftercare for stroke patients and infusion treatment at home for orthopaedic patients with an infection. These interventions have additional costs, but also save part of the costs of the conventional care, and have benefits in terms of a decrease in outpatient visits or hospitalizations. We provide a model where a hospital can calculate the impact in costs and benefits of Connected Care interventions and test this on these three examples. We show that the cost savings are able to exceed the intervention costs if an intervention has impact on the hospitalization.
前瞻性成本分析模型:"连接护理 "干预措施对医院预算的财务影响
目的介绍一种前瞻性成本分析(PCA)模型,用于估算 "互联医疗 "干预措施对医院的财务影响,以支持管理决策,并介绍该模型在三种不同医疗路径中的应用。该模型的输出包括:能力效益、成本和补偿。该模型适用于荷兰一家大型教学医院的三种干预措施:1)慢性病患者的家庭远程监控(病例:慢性阻塞性肺病);2)急性病患者的远程术后护理(病例:中风);3)居家肠外用药(病例:人工髋关节或膝关节感染)。对于慢性阻塞性肺病远程监控而言,要达到收支平衡,必须减少 10.1%的医疗使用,而对于居家抗生素治疗而言,如果能减少 4.6%的住院时间,就能达到收支平衡。中风患者远程术后护理的成本节约主要集中在减少门诊量上,而在荷兰现行的报销体系中,这并不能完全覆盖成本。它有助于决策者对干预措施的成本和能力效益进行前瞻性评估,并为实施决策提供依据。我们提出了一个前瞻性成本分析(PCA)模型,用于估算互联医疗干预措施对医院的财务影响,为管理决策提供支持。互联护理干预措施基于一种综合护理方法,利用数字医疗技术加强以患者为中心的协作护理,让患者在家中接受护理。例如,慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者的远程监控、中风患者的远程术后护理以及骨科感染患者的居家输液治疗。这些干预措施会产生额外费用,但也能节省部分常规护理费用,并在减少门诊就诊或住院方面带来益处。我们提供了一个模型,医院可以计算 "互联医疗 "干预措施对成本和效益的影响,并对这三个例子进行测试。我们表明,如果干预措施对住院治疗有影响,那么节约的成本就会超过干预成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Policy and Technology
Health Policy and Technology Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments. HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology. Topics covered by HPT will include: - Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems - Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches - National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives - Cross-border eHealth including health tourism - The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare - Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies - Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies - Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making - Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in) - Regulation and health economics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信