Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Switzerland: Exploring Regional Differences and Institutional Factors

IF 2.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Rita Schmutz
{"title":"Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Switzerland: Exploring Regional Differences and Institutional Factors","authors":"Rita Schmutz","doi":"10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study uses a comprehensive approach to assess educational mobility by considering multiple social background factors. The inequality of educational opportunity (IEOp) framework estimates the share of inequality in educational performance attributable to <em>circumstances</em> beyond students' control, reflecting the social justice principle that inequalities not based on individual choices are <em>unfair</em>. This analysis uses representative data from Switzerland's end-of-compulsory school exam to examine how social and family background characteristics contribute to variability in student performance, resulting in an inequality of educational opportunity index. The results show that <em>circumstances</em> beyond students' control account for 21% of the variation in achievement at the national level. Canton-level analysis reveals variations from 14% to 30%, with higher educational inequality in the German-speaking regions. Decomposing the IEOp estimates highlights key factors such as the number of books at home, parental education, and occupation. The level of inequality correlates with institutional features such as secondary school stratification, primary school inputs, and spending on compulsory education. Higher stratification is associated with greater inequality of opportunity without improving overall student achievement. Conversely, more instructional time in primary school enhances student performance, particularly for those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, reducing inequality. Increased spending on compulsory education is also linked to reduced IEOp. The findings support the theory that early-age schooling can reduce inequalities and improve achievement while challenging the notion that stratification in secondary schools is necessary to enhance student performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Research","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 102495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883035524001800","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study uses a comprehensive approach to assess educational mobility by considering multiple social background factors. The inequality of educational opportunity (IEOp) framework estimates the share of inequality in educational performance attributable to circumstances beyond students' control, reflecting the social justice principle that inequalities not based on individual choices are unfair. This analysis uses representative data from Switzerland's end-of-compulsory school exam to examine how social and family background characteristics contribute to variability in student performance, resulting in an inequality of educational opportunity index. The results show that circumstances beyond students' control account for 21% of the variation in achievement at the national level. Canton-level analysis reveals variations from 14% to 30%, with higher educational inequality in the German-speaking regions. Decomposing the IEOp estimates highlights key factors such as the number of books at home, parental education, and occupation. The level of inequality correlates with institutional features such as secondary school stratification, primary school inputs, and spending on compulsory education. Higher stratification is associated with greater inequality of opportunity without improving overall student achievement. Conversely, more instructional time in primary school enhances student performance, particularly for those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, reducing inequality. Increased spending on compulsory education is also linked to reduced IEOp. The findings support the theory that early-age schooling can reduce inequalities and improve achievement while challenging the notion that stratification in secondary schools is necessary to enhance student performance.
瑞士教育机会的不平等:探索地区差异和制度因素
本研究采用一种综合方法,通过考虑多种社会背景因素来评估教育流动性。教育机会不平等(IEOp)框架估算了学生无法控制的情况在教育表现不平等中所占的比例,反映了社会公正原则,即非基于个人选择的不平等是不公平的。本分析使用瑞士义务教育结束考试的代表性数据,研究社会和家庭背景特征如何导致学生成绩的差异,从而得出教育机会不平等指数。结果显示,在全国范围内,学生无法控制的情况占成绩差异的 21%。对各州的分析显示,差异从 14% 到 30%不等,德语区的教育不平等程度更高。对 IEOp 的估计值进行分解,突出了家庭书籍数量、父母教育程度和职业等关键因素。不平等程度与中学分层、小学投入和义务教育支出等制度特征相关。分层程度越高,机会越不平等,但学生的总体成绩却不会提高。相反,小学教学时间越长,学生成绩越好,尤其是社会经济背景较差的学生,不平等现象就越少。研究结果支持了早期教育可以减少不平等和提高成绩的理论,同时也对中学分层是提高学生成绩的必要条件这一观点提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Research
International Journal of Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Educational Research publishes regular papers and special issues on specific topics of interest to international audiences of educational researchers. Examples of recent Special Issues published in the journal illustrate the breadth of topics that have be included in the journal: Students Perspectives on Learning Environments, Social, Motivational and Emotional Aspects of Learning Disabilities, Epistemological Beliefs and Domain, Analyzing Mathematics Classroom Cultures and Practices, and Music Education: A site for collaborative creativity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信