A Hospital-Based Intervention to Improve Access to Buprenorphine for Patients with Opioid Use Disorder.

Matthew Fine, Leeza Hirt Wilner, Cameron K Ormiston, Linda Wang, Trevor G Lee, Michael Herscher
{"title":"A Hospital-Based Intervention to Improve Access to Buprenorphine for Patients with Opioid Use Disorder.","authors":"Matthew Fine, Leeza Hirt Wilner, Cameron K Ormiston, Linda Wang, Trevor G Lee, Michael Herscher","doi":"10.1177/29767342241292416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid use disorder (OUD) is often under-addressed in hospitalized patients. In the absence of formal addiction consult services, volunteer physician-led models can increase access to inpatient OUD treatment. This paper describes a novel, volunteer physician-led interprofessional approach to identifying patients with OUD, initiating buprenorphine, and linking to office-based opioid treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The intervention took place from April 2018 to August 2020 at a large, urban, tertiary care center and teaching hospital in New York, NY that does not have an addiction consult service. Hospitalized patients with OUD were identified by provider-driven referrals or an automated daily patient list generated by a bioinformatics search algorithm. Eligible patients with OUD were started on buprenorphine during their hospitalization and linked to primary care-based buprenorphine treatment. Patients were followed longitudinally via chart review to assess follow-up clinic rates at >30 days, >60 days, >90 days, >6 months, >12 months, and >24 months after discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a 2-year period, 178 patients were evaluated, 88 were eligible for inpatient buprenorphine, and 47 were started on buprenorphine while hospitalized. Sixty-seven patients were referred to a post-discharge visit at a primary care practice, 29 (43%) of whom attended an appointment at least 30 days after discharge. Of these, 22 (76%) returned at >60 days and 20 (69%) at 6 months. At the 1-year time point, 16 of a possible 17 patients (94%) and 15 of a possible 16 patients (94%) were still engaged in care at 2 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This intervention represents a proof of principle, adaptable model for identifying patients with OUD and engaging patients in primary care-based buprenorphine treatment. Limitations to consider include the sustainability of a volunteer-based initiative and that retention rates for 1 to 2 years post-discharge may be more indicative of the strengths of office-based opioid treatment itself as opposed to in-hospital engagement and the intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":" ","pages":"29767342241292416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342241292416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Opioid use disorder (OUD) is often under-addressed in hospitalized patients. In the absence of formal addiction consult services, volunteer physician-led models can increase access to inpatient OUD treatment. This paper describes a novel, volunteer physician-led interprofessional approach to identifying patients with OUD, initiating buprenorphine, and linking to office-based opioid treatment.

Methods: The intervention took place from April 2018 to August 2020 at a large, urban, tertiary care center and teaching hospital in New York, NY that does not have an addiction consult service. Hospitalized patients with OUD were identified by provider-driven referrals or an automated daily patient list generated by a bioinformatics search algorithm. Eligible patients with OUD were started on buprenorphine during their hospitalization and linked to primary care-based buprenorphine treatment. Patients were followed longitudinally via chart review to assess follow-up clinic rates at >30 days, >60 days, >90 days, >6 months, >12 months, and >24 months after discharge.

Results: Over a 2-year period, 178 patients were evaluated, 88 were eligible for inpatient buprenorphine, and 47 were started on buprenorphine while hospitalized. Sixty-seven patients were referred to a post-discharge visit at a primary care practice, 29 (43%) of whom attended an appointment at least 30 days after discharge. Of these, 22 (76%) returned at >60 days and 20 (69%) at 6 months. At the 1-year time point, 16 of a possible 17 patients (94%) and 15 of a possible 16 patients (94%) were still engaged in care at 2 years.

Conclusion: This intervention represents a proof of principle, adaptable model for identifying patients with OUD and engaging patients in primary care-based buprenorphine treatment. Limitations to consider include the sustainability of a volunteer-based initiative and that retention rates for 1 to 2 years post-discharge may be more indicative of the strengths of office-based opioid treatment itself as opposed to in-hospital engagement and the intervention.

基于医院的干预措施,改善阿片类药物使用障碍患者获得丁丙诺啡的机会。
背景:住院病人的阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)往往得不到充分治疗。在缺乏正规成瘾咨询服务的情况下,由医生志愿者主导的模式可以增加住院患者获得 OUD 治疗的机会。本文介绍了一种新颖的、由志愿医生主导的跨专业方法,用于识别 OUD 患者、启动丁丙诺啡治疗,并将其与基于诊室的阿片类药物治疗联系起来:该干预措施于 2018 年 4 月至 2020 年 8 月在纽约州纽约市的一家大型城市三级医疗中心和教学医院实施,该医院没有成瘾咨询服务。住院的 OUD 患者是通过医疗服务提供者的转诊或生物信息学搜索算法自动生成的每日患者名单确定的。符合条件的 OUD 患者在住院期间开始接受丁丙诺啡治疗,并与基于初级保健的丁丙诺啡治疗联系起来。通过病历审查对患者进行纵向随访,以评估出院后大于 30 天、大于 60 天、大于 90 天、大于 6 个月、大于 12 个月和大于 24 个月的随访门诊率:在两年的时间里,共对 178 名患者进行了评估,其中 88 人符合使用住院丁丙诺啡的条件,47 人在住院期间开始使用丁丙诺啡。67 名患者被转介到初级保健诊所进行出院后访视,其中 29 人(43%)在出院后至少 30 天接受了访视。其中,22 人(76%)在超过 60 天后复诊,20 人(69%)在 6 个月后复诊。在 1 年的时间点上,可能的 17 名患者中有 16 名(94%)和可能的 16 名患者中有 15 名(94%)在 2 年后仍在接受治疗:这项干预措施代表了一种原则性的、可调整的模式,可用于识别 OUD 患者并让患者参与以初级保健为基础的丁丙诺啡治疗。需要考虑的局限性包括:以志愿者为基础的倡议的可持续性,以及出院后 1 到 2 年的保留率可能更能说明诊室阿片类药物治疗本身的优势,而不是院内参与和干预的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信